Sex education and contraceptive use of adolescent and young adult females in the United States: an analysis of the National Survey of Family Growth 2011–2017

Q2 Medicine
Aneesha Cheedalla , Caroline Moreau , Anne E. Burke
{"title":"Sex education and contraceptive use of adolescent and young adult females in the United States: an analysis of the National Survey of Family Growth 2011–2017","authors":"Aneesha Cheedalla ,&nbsp;Caroline Moreau ,&nbsp;Anne E. Burke","doi":"10.1016/j.conx.2020.100048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>The effects of the comprehensiveness of sex education on sexual health measures have not been well-studied. We compared trends in comprehensive sex education and its relation to contraceptive use at first intercourse and current contraceptive use for women ages 15–24 in the United States between 2011 and 2017.</p></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><p>Analyses included females ages 15–24 from the 2011–2017 National Survey of Family Growth. We defined comprehensive sex education as including 6 topics queried in the NSFG (how to say no to sex, birth control methods, where to get birth control, how to use condoms, sexually transmitted infections, HIV/AIDS), and non-comprehensive sex education as including less than 6 topics. Multivariable regression models investigated associations with contraceptive indicators.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Among 5445 respondents, percentages of women receiving comprehensive sex education in 2011–2013, 2013–2015, and 2015–2017 were 35%, 40%, and 34%. Across all periods, respondents reporting comprehensive sex education before first sex were less likely to report first sexual intercourse before age 15 (aOR 0.55; 95% CI: 0.40–0.74) and non-volitional first intercourse (aOR 0.42, 95% CI: 0.26–0.72) compared to those with non-comprehensive sex education. At first intercourse, those with comprehensive sex education were more likely to have used any (aOR = 1.63; 95% CI: 1.18–2.25) and very effective (aOR = 1.35; 95% CI: 1.04–1.75) contraception. Comprehensive sex education was unrelated to current contraceptive use (aOR = 0.87; 95% CI: 0.63–1.21).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Comprehensive sex education was associated with increased odds of contraceptive use at first intercourse, but not current contraceptive use.</p></div><div><h3>Implications</h3><p>Programs that promote comprehensive sex education may have a positive impact on preventive behaviors at sexual debut.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10655,"journal":{"name":"Contraception: X","volume":"2 ","pages":"Article 100048"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.conx.2020.100048","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contraception: X","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590151620300319","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

Objectives

The effects of the comprehensiveness of sex education on sexual health measures have not been well-studied. We compared trends in comprehensive sex education and its relation to contraceptive use at first intercourse and current contraceptive use for women ages 15–24 in the United States between 2011 and 2017.

Study design

Analyses included females ages 15–24 from the 2011–2017 National Survey of Family Growth. We defined comprehensive sex education as including 6 topics queried in the NSFG (how to say no to sex, birth control methods, where to get birth control, how to use condoms, sexually transmitted infections, HIV/AIDS), and non-comprehensive sex education as including less than 6 topics. Multivariable regression models investigated associations with contraceptive indicators.

Results

Among 5445 respondents, percentages of women receiving comprehensive sex education in 2011–2013, 2013–2015, and 2015–2017 were 35%, 40%, and 34%. Across all periods, respondents reporting comprehensive sex education before first sex were less likely to report first sexual intercourse before age 15 (aOR 0.55; 95% CI: 0.40–0.74) and non-volitional first intercourse (aOR 0.42, 95% CI: 0.26–0.72) compared to those with non-comprehensive sex education. At first intercourse, those with comprehensive sex education were more likely to have used any (aOR = 1.63; 95% CI: 1.18–2.25) and very effective (aOR = 1.35; 95% CI: 1.04–1.75) contraception. Comprehensive sex education was unrelated to current contraceptive use (aOR = 0.87; 95% CI: 0.63–1.21).

Conclusions

Comprehensive sex education was associated with increased odds of contraceptive use at first intercourse, but not current contraceptive use.

Implications

Programs that promote comprehensive sex education may have a positive impact on preventive behaviors at sexual debut.

Abstract Image

美国青少年和年轻成年女性的性教育和避孕措施使用:2011-2017年全国家庭增长调查分析
目的性教育的综合性对性健康措施的影响尚未得到充分的研究。我们比较了2011年至2017年美国15-24岁女性的全面性教育趋势及其与首次性交时避孕药具使用和当前避孕药具使用的关系。研究设计分析包括2011-2017年全国家庭增长调查中15-24岁的女性。我们将综合性教育定义为包括在NSFG中查询的6个主题(如何对性说不,避孕方法,在哪里获得避孕措施,如何使用避孕套,性传播感染,艾滋病毒/艾滋病),非综合性教育定义为包括少于6个主题。多变量回归模型研究了与避孕指标的关系。结果5445名受访女性在2011-2013年、2013-2015年和2015-2017年接受全面性教育的比例分别为35%、40%和34%。在所有时期,在第一次性行为之前接受过全面性教育的受访者在15岁之前报告第一次性行为的可能性较小(aOR 0.55;(95% CI: 0.40-0.74)和非自愿性第一次性行为(aOR: 0.42, 95% CI: 0.26-0.72)。在初次性行为中,接受过全面性教育的人更有可能使用任何(aOR = 1.63;95% CI: 1.18-2.25)和非常有效(aOR = 1.35;95% CI: 1.04-1.75)避孕。综合性教育与当前避孕措施使用无关(aOR = 0.87;95% ci: 0.63-1.21)。结论全面的性教育与初次性交时避孕药具使用率增加有关,但与当前避孕药具使用率无关。促进综合性教育的项目可能对初次性行为的预防有积极的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Contraception: X
Contraception: X Medicine-Obstetrics and Gynecology
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
22 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信