Response of small mammal and tick communities to a catastrophic wildfire and implications for tick-borne pathogens

IF 1.4 3区 农林科学 Q2 ENTOMOLOGY
Emily L. Pascoe, Benjamin T. Plourde, Andrés M. Lopéz-Perez, Janet E. Foley
{"title":"Response of small mammal and tick communities to a catastrophic wildfire and implications for tick-borne pathogens","authors":"Emily L. Pascoe,&nbsp;Benjamin T. Plourde,&nbsp;Andrés M. Lopéz-Perez,&nbsp;Janet E. Foley","doi":"10.1111/jvec.12398","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Through their potentially devastating impacts on the environment, wildfires may impact pathogen, vector, and host interactions, leading to changing risks of vector-borne disease in humans and other animals. Despite established risks for tick-borne disease and increasing frequency and severity of wildfires in the United States, impacts of wildfire on ticks and tick-borne pathogens are understudied. In 2015, the large Wragg fire extensively burned a long-term field site at Stebbins Cold Canyon University of California Reserve (CC). We characterized the tick, reservoir host and pathogen community over a two-year period after the burn, comparing our findings to pre-fire data and to data from Quail Ridge Reserve (QR), a nearby unburned site. After the fire, there were 5.5 times more rodent, primarily <i>Peromyscus</i> spp., captures at CC than QR (compared to 3.5 times more pre-fire). There were significantly fewer dusky-footed woodrats (<i>Neotoma fuscipes</i>) at both sites post-fire, likely due to drought but not fire. Pre-fire tick infestation prevalence on rodents was comparable across sites (12.5% at CC and 9.9% at QR) and remained low at CC post-fire (13.7%) but was significantly higher at QR (48.0%), suggesting that ticks or their habitat were destroyed during the burn. Normalized difference vegetation indices documented a 16-fold loss of vegetation post- compared to pre-fire at CC; loss of vegetation and direct impacts on fauna are likely the main drivers of the post-fire differences in ticks we saw at CC. These data contribute to our understanding of tick-associated disease risks in our increasingly disturbed landscapes.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":49961,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vector Ecology","volume":"45 2","pages":"269-284"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/jvec.12398","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vector Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jvec.12398","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENTOMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Through their potentially devastating impacts on the environment, wildfires may impact pathogen, vector, and host interactions, leading to changing risks of vector-borne disease in humans and other animals. Despite established risks for tick-borne disease and increasing frequency and severity of wildfires in the United States, impacts of wildfire on ticks and tick-borne pathogens are understudied. In 2015, the large Wragg fire extensively burned a long-term field site at Stebbins Cold Canyon University of California Reserve (CC). We characterized the tick, reservoir host and pathogen community over a two-year period after the burn, comparing our findings to pre-fire data and to data from Quail Ridge Reserve (QR), a nearby unburned site. After the fire, there were 5.5 times more rodent, primarily Peromyscus spp., captures at CC than QR (compared to 3.5 times more pre-fire). There were significantly fewer dusky-footed woodrats (Neotoma fuscipes) at both sites post-fire, likely due to drought but not fire. Pre-fire tick infestation prevalence on rodents was comparable across sites (12.5% at CC and 9.9% at QR) and remained low at CC post-fire (13.7%) but was significantly higher at QR (48.0%), suggesting that ticks or their habitat were destroyed during the burn. Normalized difference vegetation indices documented a 16-fold loss of vegetation post- compared to pre-fire at CC; loss of vegetation and direct impacts on fauna are likely the main drivers of the post-fire differences in ticks we saw at CC. These data contribute to our understanding of tick-associated disease risks in our increasingly disturbed landscapes.

Abstract Image

小型哺乳动物和蜱虫群落对灾难性野火的反应及其对蜱传病原体的影响
通过对环境的潜在破坏性影响,野火可能影响病原体、病媒和宿主的相互作用,从而改变人类和其他动物患病媒传播疾病的风险。尽管确定了蜱传疾病的风险,并且美国野火的频率和严重程度都在增加,但野火对蜱和蜱传病原体的影响尚未得到充分研究。2015年,Wragg大火大面积烧毁了Stebbins Cold Canyon University of California Reserve (CC)的一个长期油田。我们在烧伤后两年的时间里对蜱虫、水库宿主和病原体群落进行了表征,并将我们的发现与火灾前的数据和附近未烧毁地点鹌鹑岭保护区(QR)的数据进行了比较。火灾后,CC区捕获的啮齿动物(主要是Peromyscus spp.)是QR区捕获的5.5倍(火灾前为3.5倍)。火灾后两个地点的暗足木鼠(Neotoma fuscipes)明显减少,可能是由于干旱而不是火灾。火灾前各地点啮齿动物的蜱虫侵染率具有可比性(CC区12.5%,QR区9.9%),火灾后各地点的蜱虫侵染率较低(13.7%),但QR区明显较高(48.0%),表明火灾期间蜱虫或其栖息地被破坏。归一化植被指数显示,与火灾前相比,CC火灾后植被损失为火灾前的16倍;植被的丧失和对动物的直接影响可能是我们在CC看到的火灾后蜱虫差异的主要驱动因素。这些数据有助于我们理解在我们日益受到干扰的景观中与蜱虫相关的疾病风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Vector Ecology
Journal of Vector Ecology 生物-昆虫学
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
5.90%
发文量
31
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Vector Ecology is an international journal published by the Society for Vector Ecology. It is concerned with all aspects of the biology, ecology, and control of arthropod and vertebrate vectors and the interrelationships between the vectors and the agents of disease that they transmit. The journal publishes original research articles and scientific notes, as well as comprehensive reviews of vector biology based on presentations at Society meetings. All papers are reviewed by at least two qualified scientists who recommend their suitability for publication. Acceptance of manuscripts is based on their scientific merit and is the final decision of the editor, but these decisions may be appealed to the editorial board. The journal began publishing in 1974 and now publishes on-line only.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信