Does lack of brain injury mean lack of cognitive impairment in traumatic spinal cord injury?

The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine Pub Date : 2022-05-01 Epub Date: 2020-12-15 DOI:10.1080/10790268.2020.1847564
Eyal Heled, Keren Tal, Gabi Zeilig
{"title":"Does lack of brain injury mean lack of cognitive impairment in traumatic spinal cord injury?","authors":"Eyal Heled,&nbsp;Keren Tal,&nbsp;Gabi Zeilig","doi":"10.1080/10790268.2020.1847564","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Traumatic spinal cord injury (tSCI) has implications in many areas, including cognitive functioning. Findings regarding cognitive problems in people with SCI are inconsistent, presumably due to multiple variables than can affect performance, among them emotional variables. The purpose of the current study was to elucidate cognitive sequalae in some individuals with tSCI with no medical record of brain injury, while taking emotional variables into consideration.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional, with two groups.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>A public rehabilitation center.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Twenty participants with tSCI at least ten months post injury and twenty non-SCI controls, matched for sex, age, and education.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures: </strong>A battery of neuropsychological tests tapping executive functions, memory, attention, and naming abilities, in addition to questionnaires assessing depression and distress.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>When emotional variables were statistically controlled, participants with tSCI showed higher levels of depression and distress and scored lower than non-SCI control participants on all cognitive tests except naming. Executive functions were found to have the highest effect size, though no specific ability was sensitive enough to differentiate between the groups in a binary logistic regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In some individuals with chronic tSCI, lower cognitive ability that is unrelated to emotional distress might result from spinal cord damage and its implications in a population who's medical records show no indication of brain injury. This highlights the importance of conducting cognitive evaluation following SCI, so that deficits can be effectively addressed during rehabilitation.</p>","PeriodicalId":501560,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"373-380"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10790268.2020.1847564","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10790268.2020.1847564","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/12/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Objective: Traumatic spinal cord injury (tSCI) has implications in many areas, including cognitive functioning. Findings regarding cognitive problems in people with SCI are inconsistent, presumably due to multiple variables than can affect performance, among them emotional variables. The purpose of the current study was to elucidate cognitive sequalae in some individuals with tSCI with no medical record of brain injury, while taking emotional variables into consideration.

Design: Cross-sectional, with two groups.

Setting: A public rehabilitation center.

Participants: Twenty participants with tSCI at least ten months post injury and twenty non-SCI controls, matched for sex, age, and education.

Intervention: None.

Outcome measures: A battery of neuropsychological tests tapping executive functions, memory, attention, and naming abilities, in addition to questionnaires assessing depression and distress.

Results: When emotional variables were statistically controlled, participants with tSCI showed higher levels of depression and distress and scored lower than non-SCI control participants on all cognitive tests except naming. Executive functions were found to have the highest effect size, though no specific ability was sensitive enough to differentiate between the groups in a binary logistic regression analysis.

Conclusion: In some individuals with chronic tSCI, lower cognitive ability that is unrelated to emotional distress might result from spinal cord damage and its implications in a population who's medical records show no indication of brain injury. This highlights the importance of conducting cognitive evaluation following SCI, so that deficits can be effectively addressed during rehabilitation.

创伤性脊髓损伤无脑损伤是否意味着无认知损伤?
目的:外伤性脊髓损伤(tSCI)具有包括认知功能在内的许多领域的影响。关于脊髓损伤患者的认知问题的研究结果并不一致,可能是由于影响表现的多种变量,其中包括情绪变量。本研究的目的是在考虑情绪因素的情况下,阐明一些没有脑损伤医疗记录的tSCI患者的认知后遗症。设计:横断面,两组。环境:公共康复中心。参与者:20名损伤后至少10个月的tSCI患者和20名非sci对照组,性别、年龄和教育程度相匹配。干预:没有。结果测量:一系列神经心理学测试,包括执行功能、记忆力、注意力和命名能力,以及评估抑郁和痛苦的问卷调查。结果:当情绪变量得到统计控制时,tSCI患者表现出更高的抑郁和痛苦水平,除命名外,所有认知测试的得分均低于非sci对照组。执行功能被发现具有最高的效应大小,尽管在二元逻辑回归分析中没有特定的能力足够敏感以区分两组。结论:在一些慢性tSCI患者中,与情绪困扰无关的认知能力下降可能是由脊髓损伤引起的,这对医疗记录显示没有脑损伤迹象的人群有影响。这突出了在脊髓损伤后进行认知评估的重要性,以便在康复期间有效地解决缺陷。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信