Trends in Initial Systemic Therapy for Elderly Patients with Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma.

Chelsea K Osterman, Allison M Deal, Matthew I Milowsky, Marc A Bjurlin, Tracy L Rose
{"title":"Trends in Initial Systemic Therapy for Elderly Patients with Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma.","authors":"Chelsea K Osterman, Allison M Deal, Matthew I Milowsky, Marc A Bjurlin, Tracy L Rose","doi":"10.3233/KCA-200089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The treatment landscape for metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) is rapidly changing. It is unknown how adoption of new types of therapies may differ by patient age.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare trends in first-line therapy use for older (≥70 years) and younger (< 70) patients with mRCC before and after approval of nivolumab in 2015.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using the National Cancer Database, we assessed trends in first-line therapy use by calculating the proportion of patients receiving targeted therapy, immunotherapy, or no systemic therapy by year of diagnosis. Initial systemic treatment was compared for patients diagnosed in 2016 with patients diagnosed in 2011 as a control group prior to nivolumab approval. Multivariable regression analysis was used to evaluate the interaction between year of diagnosis and elderly status for use of first-line immunotherapy or targeted therapy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 2006 to 2016, the proportion of patients receiving any type of systemic therapy increased from 43.7% to 56.5%. On stratified multivariable regression analysis, older patients diagnosed in 2016 were 17.3 times more likely to receive first-line immunotherapy compared to those diagnosed in 2011, while younger patients were 2.3 times more likely. There was no change in targeted therapy use over this time regardless of patient age.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The rate of adoption of first-line immunotherapy was particularly pronounced for elderly compared to younger patients. While first-line use of immunotherapy may have allowed elderly patients to receive systemic therapy that they otherwise would not, the efficacy of these drugs in elderly patients deserves further study.</p>","PeriodicalId":74039,"journal":{"name":"Kidney cancer (Clifton, Va.)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/d2/56/kca-4-kca200089.PMC7605347.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kidney cancer (Clifton, Va.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/KCA-200089","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The treatment landscape for metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) is rapidly changing. It is unknown how adoption of new types of therapies may differ by patient age.

Objective: To compare trends in first-line therapy use for older (≥70 years) and younger (< 70) patients with mRCC before and after approval of nivolumab in 2015.

Methods: Using the National Cancer Database, we assessed trends in first-line therapy use by calculating the proportion of patients receiving targeted therapy, immunotherapy, or no systemic therapy by year of diagnosis. Initial systemic treatment was compared for patients diagnosed in 2016 with patients diagnosed in 2011 as a control group prior to nivolumab approval. Multivariable regression analysis was used to evaluate the interaction between year of diagnosis and elderly status for use of first-line immunotherapy or targeted therapy.

Results: From 2006 to 2016, the proportion of patients receiving any type of systemic therapy increased from 43.7% to 56.5%. On stratified multivariable regression analysis, older patients diagnosed in 2016 were 17.3 times more likely to receive first-line immunotherapy compared to those diagnosed in 2011, while younger patients were 2.3 times more likely. There was no change in targeted therapy use over this time regardless of patient age.

Conclusions: The rate of adoption of first-line immunotherapy was particularly pronounced for elderly compared to younger patients. While first-line use of immunotherapy may have allowed elderly patients to receive systemic therapy that they otherwise would not, the efficacy of these drugs in elderly patients deserves further study.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

转移性透明细胞肾细胞癌老年患者的初始系统治疗趋势。
背景:转移性透明细胞肾细胞癌(mRCC)的治疗形势正在发生迅速变化。目前尚不清楚不同年龄的患者采用新型疗法的情况有何不同:比较老年患者(≥70 岁)和年轻患者(≥70 岁)使用一线疗法的趋势:利用全国癌症数据库,我们按诊断年份计算了接受靶向治疗、免疫治疗或未接受系统治疗的患者比例,从而评估了一线治疗的使用趋势。我们将 2016 年确诊的患者与 2011 年确诊的患者(nivolumab 批准之前的对照组)的初始系统治疗进行了比较。多变量回归分析用于评估诊断年份和老年状态对使用一线免疫疗法或靶向疗法的交互作用:从2006年到2016年,接受任何类型系统治疗的患者比例从43.7%增至56.5%。通过分层多变量回归分析,与2011年确诊的患者相比,2016年确诊的老年患者接受一线免疫疗法的可能性增加了17.3倍,而年轻患者则增加了2.3倍。在此期间,无论患者年龄如何,靶向治疗的使用率均无变化:结论:与年轻患者相比,老年患者采用一线免疫疗法的比例尤其明显。虽然一线免疫疗法的使用可能使老年患者接受了原本无法接受的全身治疗,但这些药物对老年患者的疗效值得进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信