Efficacy and safety of tyrosine kinase inhibitors in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer harboring epidermal growth factor receptor mutation: a network meta-analysis.

Pub Date : 2020-11-23 DOI:10.2217/lmt-2020-0011
Abdullah Alanazi, Ismaeel Yunusa, Khaled Elenizi, Abdulaziz I Alzarea
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of tyrosine kinase inhibitors in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer harboring epidermal growth factor receptor mutation: a network meta-analysis.","authors":"Abdullah Alanazi,&nbsp;Ismaeel Yunusa,&nbsp;Khaled Elenizi,&nbsp;Abdulaziz I Alzarea","doi":"10.2217/lmt-2020-0011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To compare the efficacy and safety of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) as first-line treatment in patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with positive <i>EGFR</i> mutation.</p><p><strong>Materials & methods: </strong>Following a systematic literature review until December 2019, we conducted a random-effects pairwise and network meta-analyses (NMA). We ranked treatments for efficacy and safety based on the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Tyrosine kinase inhibitors of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR-TKI) improved survival outcomes with fewer grade 3 or higher adverse events compared to chemotherapy. Overall survival results suggest that osimertinib has the highest probability of being the most efficacious (SUCRA, 79.9%), followed by dacomitinib (SUCRA, 75.8%). Adverse events results suggest that osimertinib (SUCRA, 84.3%) and gefitinib (SUCRA, 78.9%) has the highest probability of being the safest.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this NMA, we found that osimertinib is the most efficacious and safest EGFR-TKI. These results may guide clinicians in choosing the most appropriate treatment option among EGFR-TKIs for their patient's individual clinical characteristics.</p>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2217/lmt-2020-0011","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2217/lmt-2020-0011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

Aim: To compare the efficacy and safety of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) as first-line treatment in patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with positive EGFR mutation.

Materials & methods: Following a systematic literature review until December 2019, we conducted a random-effects pairwise and network meta-analyses (NMA). We ranked treatments for efficacy and safety based on the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA).

Results: Tyrosine kinase inhibitors of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR-TKI) improved survival outcomes with fewer grade 3 or higher adverse events compared to chemotherapy. Overall survival results suggest that osimertinib has the highest probability of being the most efficacious (SUCRA, 79.9%), followed by dacomitinib (SUCRA, 75.8%). Adverse events results suggest that osimertinib (SUCRA, 84.3%) and gefitinib (SUCRA, 78.9%) has the highest probability of being the safest.

Conclusion: In this NMA, we found that osimertinib is the most efficacious and safest EGFR-TKI. These results may guide clinicians in choosing the most appropriate treatment option among EGFR-TKIs for their patient's individual clinical characteristics.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

分享
查看原文
酪氨酸激酶抑制剂治疗表皮生长因子受体突变晚期非小细胞肺癌的疗效和安全性:一项网络荟萃分析。
目的:比较酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKIs)作为EGFR阳性突变的局部晚期或转移性非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者一线治疗的疗效和安全性。材料与方法:在系统文献综述之后,我们进行了随机效应配对和网络荟萃分析(NMA)。我们根据累积排名曲线(SUCRA)下的表面对治疗的疗效和安全性进行排名。结果:与化疗相比,表皮生长因子受体(EGFR-TKI)酪氨酸激酶抑制剂改善了生存结果,减少了3级或更高的不良事件。总体生存结果显示,奥西替尼最有效的概率最高(SUCRA, 79.9%),其次是dacomitinib (SUCRA, 75.8%)。不良事件结果显示,奥西替尼(SUCRA, 84.3%)和吉非替尼(SUCRA, 78.9%)最安全的概率最高。结论:在本次NMA中,我们发现奥西替尼是最有效、最安全的EGFR-TKI。这些结果可以指导临床医生根据患者的个体临床特征在egfr - tki中选择最合适的治疗方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信