Radial Basis Function Artificial Neural Network for the Investigation of Thyroid Cytological Lesions.

IF 1.7 Q4 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Journal of Thyroid Research Pub Date : 2020-11-24 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2020/5464787
Christos Fragopoulos, Abraham Pouliakis, Christos Meristoudis, Emmanouil Mastorakis, Niki Margari, Nicolaos Chroniaris, Nektarios Koufopoulos, Alexander G Delides, Nicolaos Machairas, Vasileia Ntomi, Konstantinos Nastos, Ioannis G Panayiotides, Emmanouil Pikoulis, Evangelos P Misiakos
{"title":"Radial Basis Function Artificial Neural Network for the Investigation of Thyroid Cytological Lesions.","authors":"Christos Fragopoulos,&nbsp;Abraham Pouliakis,&nbsp;Christos Meristoudis,&nbsp;Emmanouil Mastorakis,&nbsp;Niki Margari,&nbsp;Nicolaos Chroniaris,&nbsp;Nektarios Koufopoulos,&nbsp;Alexander G Delides,&nbsp;Nicolaos Machairas,&nbsp;Vasileia Ntomi,&nbsp;Konstantinos Nastos,&nbsp;Ioannis G Panayiotides,&nbsp;Emmanouil Pikoulis,&nbsp;Evangelos P Misiakos","doi":"10.1155/2020/5464787","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study investigates the potential of an artificial intelligence (AI) methodology, the radial basis function (RBF) artificial neural network (ANN), in the evaluation of thyroid lesions. <i>Study Design</i>. The study was performed on 447 patients who had both cytological and histological evaluation in agreement. Cytological specimens were prepared using liquid-based cytology, and the histological result was based on subsequent surgical samples. Each specimen was digitized; on these images, nuclear morphology features were measured by the use of an image analysis system. The extracted measurements (41,324 nuclei) were separated into two sets: the training set that was used to create the RBF ANN and the test set that was used to evaluate the RBF performance. The system aimed to predict the histological status as benign or malignant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The RBF ANN obtained in the training set has sensitivity 82.5%, specificity 94.6%, and overall accuracy 90.3%, while in the test set, these indices were 81.4%, 90.0%, and 86.9%, respectively. Algorithm was used to classify patients on the basis of the RBF ANN, the overall sensitivity was 95.0%, the specificity was 95.5%, and no statistically significant difference was observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>AI techniques and especially ANNs, only in the recent years, have been studied extensively. The proposed approach is promising to avoid misdiagnoses and assists the everyday practice of the cytopathology. The major drawback in this approach is the automation of a procedure to accurately detect and measure cell nuclei from the digitized images.</p>","PeriodicalId":17394,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Thyroid Research","volume":"2020 ","pages":"5464787"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2020/5464787","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Thyroid Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/5464787","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Objective: This study investigates the potential of an artificial intelligence (AI) methodology, the radial basis function (RBF) artificial neural network (ANN), in the evaluation of thyroid lesions. Study Design. The study was performed on 447 patients who had both cytological and histological evaluation in agreement. Cytological specimens were prepared using liquid-based cytology, and the histological result was based on subsequent surgical samples. Each specimen was digitized; on these images, nuclear morphology features were measured by the use of an image analysis system. The extracted measurements (41,324 nuclei) were separated into two sets: the training set that was used to create the RBF ANN and the test set that was used to evaluate the RBF performance. The system aimed to predict the histological status as benign or malignant.

Results: The RBF ANN obtained in the training set has sensitivity 82.5%, specificity 94.6%, and overall accuracy 90.3%, while in the test set, these indices were 81.4%, 90.0%, and 86.9%, respectively. Algorithm was used to classify patients on the basis of the RBF ANN, the overall sensitivity was 95.0%, the specificity was 95.5%, and no statistically significant difference was observed.

Conclusion: AI techniques and especially ANNs, only in the recent years, have been studied extensively. The proposed approach is promising to avoid misdiagnoses and assists the everyday practice of the cytopathology. The major drawback in this approach is the automation of a procedure to accurately detect and measure cell nuclei from the digitized images.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

径向基函数人工神经网络在甲状腺细胞学病变研究中的应用。
目的:探讨人工智能(AI)方法——径向基函数(RBF)人工神经网络(ANN)在甲状腺病变评估中的潜力。研究设计。该研究对447例细胞学和组织学评估一致的患者进行了研究。细胞学标本采用液体细胞学方法制备,组织学结果以后续手术标本为基础。每个标本被数字化;在这些图像上,使用图像分析系统测量核形态特征。提取的测量值(41,324个核)被分成两组:用于创建RBF神经网络的训练集和用于评估RBF性能的测试集。该系统旨在预测良性或恶性的组织学状态。结果:得到的RBF神经网络在训练集中的灵敏度为82.5%,特异性为94.6%,总体准确率为90.3%,而在测试集中,这些指标分别为81.4%,90.0%和86.9%。采用基于RBF神经网络的算法对患者进行分类,总体敏感性为95.0%,特异性为95.5%,差异无统计学意义。结论:人工智能技术,特别是人工神经网络,直到最近几年才得到了广泛的研究。该方法有望避免误诊,并有助于细胞病理学的日常实践。这种方法的主要缺点是,从数字化图像中精确检测和测量细胞核的过程是自动化的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Thyroid Research
Journal of Thyroid Research ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
17 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信