Mutations in DNA Repair Genes and Clinical Outcomes of Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Receiving Oxaliplatin or Irinotecan-containing Regimens.

Eric I Marks, Robert Matera, Adam J Olszewski, Evgeny Yakirevich, Wafik S El-Deiry, Howard Safran, Benedito A Carneiro
{"title":"Mutations in DNA Repair Genes and Clinical Outcomes of Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Receiving Oxaliplatin or Irinotecan-containing Regimens.","authors":"Eric I Marks,&nbsp;Robert Matera,&nbsp;Adam J Olszewski,&nbsp;Evgeny Yakirevich,&nbsp;Wafik S El-Deiry,&nbsp;Howard Safran,&nbsp;Benedito A Carneiro","doi":"10.1097/COC.0000000000000785","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>First-line regimens in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) combine a fluoropyrimidine with oxaliplatin (FOLFOX/XELOX) or irinotecan (FOLFIRI). There is limited efficacy data to guide the selection of one treatment over the other. This study investigated whether mutations affecting DNA damage response (DDR) could differentially influence the response to oxaliplatin and irinotecan-containing regimens.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed 49 patients with mCRC for whom treatment outcomes and results of comprehensive genomic profiling of tumors were available. Specimens with at least 1 pathogenic mutation involving BRCA1, BRCA2, ATM, BARD1, BRIP1, CDK12, CHEK1, CHEK2, FANCL, PALB2, PPP2R2A, RAD51B, RAD51C, RAD51D, or RAD54L were classified as DDR-mutated, while those without mutations were DDR-wild-type (WT). We compared the overall survival (OS), disease control rate, and response rate (RR) between the DDR-mutated and DDR-WT groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>DDR mutations occurred in 11 patients (22%). First-line treatment with an oxaliplatin-containing regimen was administered to 33 patients (31 FOLFOX, 2 XELOX), while 16 patients received FOLFIRI. Among DDR-mutated cases, first-line treatment with FOLFOX/XELOX correlated with a statistically significant improvement in median OS compared with FOLFIRI (3.4 vs.1.8 y; P=0.042) and numerically higher RR (50% vs. 33%; P=0.58). No significant difference in OS (2.4 vs. 2.5 y; P=0.42), RR, disease control rate was observed between the 2 regimens in patients with DDR-WT tumors.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Mutations in DDR genes were present in 22% of patients with mCRC. In patients with DDR-mutated tumors, initial treatment with FOLFOX/XELOX correlated with improved OS and a numerically higher RR compared with FOLFIRI.</p>","PeriodicalId":501816,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"68-73"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Clinical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/COC.0000000000000785","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Objectives: First-line regimens in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) combine a fluoropyrimidine with oxaliplatin (FOLFOX/XELOX) or irinotecan (FOLFIRI). There is limited efficacy data to guide the selection of one treatment over the other. This study investigated whether mutations affecting DNA damage response (DDR) could differentially influence the response to oxaliplatin and irinotecan-containing regimens.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 49 patients with mCRC for whom treatment outcomes and results of comprehensive genomic profiling of tumors were available. Specimens with at least 1 pathogenic mutation involving BRCA1, BRCA2, ATM, BARD1, BRIP1, CDK12, CHEK1, CHEK2, FANCL, PALB2, PPP2R2A, RAD51B, RAD51C, RAD51D, or RAD54L were classified as DDR-mutated, while those without mutations were DDR-wild-type (WT). We compared the overall survival (OS), disease control rate, and response rate (RR) between the DDR-mutated and DDR-WT groups.

Results: DDR mutations occurred in 11 patients (22%). First-line treatment with an oxaliplatin-containing regimen was administered to 33 patients (31 FOLFOX, 2 XELOX), while 16 patients received FOLFIRI. Among DDR-mutated cases, first-line treatment with FOLFOX/XELOX correlated with a statistically significant improvement in median OS compared with FOLFIRI (3.4 vs.1.8 y; P=0.042) and numerically higher RR (50% vs. 33%; P=0.58). No significant difference in OS (2.4 vs. 2.5 y; P=0.42), RR, disease control rate was observed between the 2 regimens in patients with DDR-WT tumors.

Conclusions: Mutations in DDR genes were present in 22% of patients with mCRC. In patients with DDR-mutated tumors, initial treatment with FOLFOX/XELOX correlated with improved OS and a numerically higher RR compared with FOLFIRI.

接受奥沙利铂或伊立替康治疗的转移性结直肠癌患者的DNA修复基因突变和临床结果
目的:转移性结直肠癌(mCRC)的一线治疗方案:氟嘧啶联合奥沙利铂(FOLFOX/XELOX)或伊立替康(FOLFIRI)。有有限的疗效数据来指导一种治疗方法的选择。这项研究调查了影响DNA损伤反应(DDR)的突变是否会对奥沙利铂和伊立替康治疗方案的反应产生不同的影响。方法:我们回顾性分析了49例mCRC患者的治疗结果和肿瘤的综合基因组图谱。具有至少1个致病突变的标本,包括BRCA1、BRCA2、ATM、BARD1、BRIP1、CDK12、CHEK1、CHEK2、FANCL、PALB2、PPP2R2A、RAD51B、RAD51C、RAD51D或RAD54L,被归类为ddr突变,无突变的标本被归类为ddr野生型(WT)。我们比较了ddr -突变组和DDR-WT组的总生存率(OS)、疾病控制率和缓解率(RR)。结果:11例(22%)患者发生DDR突变。33例患者(31例FOLFOX, 2例XELOX)接受一线奥沙利铂治疗,16例患者接受FOLFIRI。在ddr突变的病例中,与FOLFIRI相比,一线治疗FOLFOX/XELOX与中位OS的改善有统计学意义(3.4 vs.1.8;P=0.042)和数值上更高的RR (50% vs. 33%;P = 0.58)。OS无显著差异(2.4 vs. 2.5 y;P=0.42), RR,两种治疗方案对DDR-WT肿瘤患者的疾病控制率比较。结论:22%的mCRC患者存在DDR基因突变。在ddr突变肿瘤患者中,与FOLFIRI相比,FOLFOX/XELOX初始治疗与改善的OS和数值上更高的RR相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信