Fatigue in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis measured by the Fatigue Assessment Scale during antifibrotic treatment.

IF 1.8 Q3 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Line Kølner-Augustson, Thomas Skovhus Prior, Vibeke Skivild, Anette Aalestrup, Elisabeth Bendstrup
{"title":"Fatigue in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis measured by the Fatigue Assessment Scale during antifibrotic treatment.","authors":"Line Kølner-Augustson,&nbsp;Thomas Skovhus Prior,&nbsp;Vibeke Skivild,&nbsp;Anette Aalestrup,&nbsp;Elisabeth Bendstrup","doi":"10.1080/20018525.2020.1853658","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>: Fatigue is a common complaint in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and has been reported in a considerable percentage of patients. Fatigue is also a registered side effect of pirfenidone, one of two approved antifibrotic drugs. The Fatigue Assessment Scale (FAS) was developed for assessment of fatigue in sarcoidosis and validated in patients with sarcoidosis. FAS has been used in a few IPF studies but has not been validated. <b>Aims</b>: To study the change in FAS after initiation of pirfenidone or nintedanib in the treatment of patients with IPF during a six-month period. <b>Methods</b>: Between April 2017 and January 2018, all incident patients with IPF starting antifibrotic treatment were invited to complete FAS before, four weeks, three, and six months after initiation of antifibrotic treatment. Baseline characteristics including lung function were registered. <b>Results</b>: Fifty-two patients were included, mean FVC% 84.8, mean DLCO% 51.4. Nintedanib was started in 25 patients; 27 patients started pirfenidone. Sixty-four percent of patients had a FAS score >22 indicating substantial fatigue at baseline. There was no statistically significant difference in FAS score for patients treated with nintedanib or pirfenidone at any time point. FAS score increased statistically significantly during the six-month follow-up. This change was driven by patients without substantial fatigue at baseline with an increase in FAS score of 8.4 points; patients with substantial fatigue at baseline experienced no statistically significant change. <b>Conclusion</b>: A majority of patients with IPF suffered from substantial fatigue at the time of diagnosis. Fatigue progressed over time and increasing fatigue was associated with younger age, nintedanib treatment and low degree of fatigue at baseline. There was no significant difference in FAS score between the two antifibrotic treatments at any time point, even though fatigue is not a registered side effect in nintedanib.</p>","PeriodicalId":11872,"journal":{"name":"European Clinical Respiratory Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/20018525.2020.1853658","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Clinical Respiratory Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20018525.2020.1853658","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Background: Fatigue is a common complaint in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and has been reported in a considerable percentage of patients. Fatigue is also a registered side effect of pirfenidone, one of two approved antifibrotic drugs. The Fatigue Assessment Scale (FAS) was developed for assessment of fatigue in sarcoidosis and validated in patients with sarcoidosis. FAS has been used in a few IPF studies but has not been validated. Aims: To study the change in FAS after initiation of pirfenidone or nintedanib in the treatment of patients with IPF during a six-month period. Methods: Between April 2017 and January 2018, all incident patients with IPF starting antifibrotic treatment were invited to complete FAS before, four weeks, three, and six months after initiation of antifibrotic treatment. Baseline characteristics including lung function were registered. Results: Fifty-two patients were included, mean FVC% 84.8, mean DLCO% 51.4. Nintedanib was started in 25 patients; 27 patients started pirfenidone. Sixty-four percent of patients had a FAS score >22 indicating substantial fatigue at baseline. There was no statistically significant difference in FAS score for patients treated with nintedanib or pirfenidone at any time point. FAS score increased statistically significantly during the six-month follow-up. This change was driven by patients without substantial fatigue at baseline with an increase in FAS score of 8.4 points; patients with substantial fatigue at baseline experienced no statistically significant change. Conclusion: A majority of patients with IPF suffered from substantial fatigue at the time of diagnosis. Fatigue progressed over time and increasing fatigue was associated with younger age, nintedanib treatment and low degree of fatigue at baseline. There was no significant difference in FAS score between the two antifibrotic treatments at any time point, even though fatigue is not a registered side effect in nintedanib.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

抗纤维化治疗期间疲劳评定量表测量特发性肺纤维化的疲劳。
背景:疲劳是特发性肺纤维化(IPF)患者的常见主诉,并且在相当比例的患者中有报道。疲劳也是吡非尼酮的副作用,吡非尼酮是两种被批准的抗纤维化药物之一。疲劳评估量表(FAS)用于评估结节病患者的疲劳,并在结节病患者中得到验证。FAS已在一些IPF研究中使用,但尚未得到证实。目的:研究IPF患者开始使用吡非尼酮或尼达尼布治疗6个月后FAS的变化。方法:在2017年4月至2018年1月期间,所有开始抗纤维化治疗的IPF患者被邀请在抗纤维化治疗开始前、4周、3周和6个月完成FAS。记录包括肺功能在内的基线特征。结果:纳入52例患者,平均FVC% 84.8,平均DLCO% 51.4。尼达尼布在25名患者中开始使用;27例患者开始使用吡非尼酮。64%的患者FAS评分>22,表明在基线时存在严重疲劳。尼达尼布和吡非尼酮治疗组FAS评分在任何时间点均无统计学差异。FAS评分在6个月随访期间均有显著升高。这一变化是由基线时无明显疲劳的患者驱动的,FAS评分增加8.4分;在基线时出现严重疲劳的患者没有统计学上的显著变化。结论:大多数IPF患者在诊断时存在明显的疲劳。疲劳随着时间的推移而恶化,疲劳的增加与年龄更小、尼达尼布治疗和基线时的低疲劳程度有关。两种抗纤维化治疗在任何时间点的FAS评分均无显著差异,尽管疲劳不是尼达尼布的登记副作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
16 weeks
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信