The Rough Journey to Success: Examining the Nonlinear Dynamics of Processes and Performance in Teams.

IF 0.6 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, MATHEMATICAL
Pedro Marques-Quinteiro, Pedro Ramos-Villagrasa, Jose Navarro, Ana Margarida Passos, Luis Curral
{"title":"The Rough Journey to Success: Examining the Nonlinear Dynamics of Processes and Performance in Teams.","authors":"Pedro Marques-Quinteiro,&nbsp;Pedro Ramos-Villagrasa,&nbsp;Jose Navarro,&nbsp;Ana Margarida Passos,&nbsp;Luis Curral","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We build on Nonlinear Dynamic Systems (NDS) theory to examine if team performance change across a complete performance cycle is nonlinear, and if such change is related with team processes change over time. Participants were 214 teams enrolled in one management competition. The hypotheses were tested using nonlinear regressions and catastrophe modeling. The results of the nonlinear regression model support the hypothesis that change in team performance over time follows a cusp catastrophe distribution, R2Cusp = .93, F(5, 1065) = 16889.82, p < .001; and that team processes do function as asymmetry (transition and action processes) and bifurcation (interpersonal processes) factors. The results also suggest that the cusp catastrophe model (R2 = .68) explains team performance better than the linear (R2 = .05) and logistic models (R2 = .07). This study reiterates the importance of incorporating the NDS perspective within the teamwork literature to leverage our knowledge about the way teams perform over time.</p>","PeriodicalId":46218,"journal":{"name":"Nonlinear Dynamics Psychology and Life Sciences","volume":"25 1","pages":"69-91"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nonlinear Dynamics Psychology and Life Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MATHEMATICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We build on Nonlinear Dynamic Systems (NDS) theory to examine if team performance change across a complete performance cycle is nonlinear, and if such change is related with team processes change over time. Participants were 214 teams enrolled in one management competition. The hypotheses were tested using nonlinear regressions and catastrophe modeling. The results of the nonlinear regression model support the hypothesis that change in team performance over time follows a cusp catastrophe distribution, R2Cusp = .93, F(5, 1065) = 16889.82, p < .001; and that team processes do function as asymmetry (transition and action processes) and bifurcation (interpersonal processes) factors. The results also suggest that the cusp catastrophe model (R2 = .68) explains team performance better than the linear (R2 = .05) and logistic models (R2 = .07). This study reiterates the importance of incorporating the NDS perspective within the teamwork literature to leverage our knowledge about the way teams perform over time.

艰难的成功之旅:检视团队过程与绩效的非线性动态。
我们建立在非线性动态系统(NDS)理论的基础上,以检验在一个完整的绩效周期中,团队绩效变化是否非线性,以及这种变化是否与团队过程随时间的变化有关。共有214支队伍参加了一场管理竞赛。使用非线性回归和突变模型对假设进行了检验。非线性回归模型的结果支持团队绩效随时间变化服从尖点突变分布的假设,R2Cusp = 0.93, F(5,1065) = 16889.82, p < .001;并且团队过程确实发挥着不对称(过渡和行动过程)和分歧(人际过程)因素的作用。结果还表明,尖点突变模型(R2 = .68)比线性模型(R2 = .05)和logistic模型(R2 = .07)更能解释团队绩效。这项研究重申了将NDS观点纳入团队合作文献的重要性,以利用我们对团队长期表现方式的了解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
11.10%
发文量
26
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信