The timing and causality of ecological shifts on Caribbean reefs.

3区 生物学 Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Advances in Marine Biology Pub Date : 2020-01-01 Epub Date: 2020-10-08 DOI:10.1016/bs.amb.2020.08.008
William F Precht, Richard B Aronson, Toby A Gardner, Jennifer A Gill, Julie P Hawkins, Edwin A Hernández-Delgado, Walter C Jaap, Tim R McClanahan, Melanie D McField, Thaddeus J T Murdoch, Maggy M Nugues, Callum M Roberts, Christiane K Schelten, Andrew R Watkinson, Isabelle M Côté
{"title":"The timing and causality of ecological shifts on Caribbean reefs.","authors":"William F Precht,&nbsp;Richard B Aronson,&nbsp;Toby A Gardner,&nbsp;Jennifer A Gill,&nbsp;Julie P Hawkins,&nbsp;Edwin A Hernández-Delgado,&nbsp;Walter C Jaap,&nbsp;Tim R McClanahan,&nbsp;Melanie D McField,&nbsp;Thaddeus J T Murdoch,&nbsp;Maggy M Nugues,&nbsp;Callum M Roberts,&nbsp;Christiane K Schelten,&nbsp;Andrew R Watkinson,&nbsp;Isabelle M Côté","doi":"10.1016/bs.amb.2020.08.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Caribbean reefs have experienced unprecedented changes in the past four decades. Of great concern is the perceived widespread shift from coral to macroalgal dominance and the question of whether it represents a new, stable equilibrium for coral-reef communities. The primary causes of the shift-grazing pressure (top-down), nutrient loading (bottom-up) or direct coral mortality (side-in)-still remain somewhat controversial in the coral-reef literature. We have attempted to tease out the relative importance of each of these causes. Four insights emerge from our analysis of an early regional dataset of information on the benthic composition of Caribbean reefs spanning the years 1977-2001. First, although three-quarters of reef sites have experienced coral declines concomitant with macroalgal increases, fewer than 10% of the more than 200 sites studied were dominated by macroalgae in 2001, by even the most conservative definition of dominance. Using relative dominance as the threshold, a total of 49 coral-to-macroalgae shifts were detected. This total represents ~35% of all sites that were dominated by coral at the start of their monitoring periods. Four shifts (8.2%) occurred because of coral loss with no change in macroalgal cover, 15 (30.6%) occurred because of macroalgal gain without coral loss, and 30 (61.2%) occurred owing to concomitant coral decline and macroalgal increase. Second, the timing of shifts at the regional scale is most consistent with the side-in model of reef degradation, which invokes coral mortality as a precursor to macroalgal takeover, because more shifts occurred after regional coral-mortality events than expected by chance. Third, instantaneous observations taken at the start and end of the time-series for individual sites showed these reefs existed along a continuum of coral and macroalgal cover. The continuous, broadly negative relationship between coral and macroalgal cover suggests that in some cases coral-to-macroalgae phase shifts may be reversed by removing sources of perturbation or restoring critical components such as the herbivorous sea urchin Diadema antillarum to the system. The five instances in which macroalgal dominance was reversed corroborate the conclusion that macroalgal dominance is not a stable, alternative community state as has been commonly assumed. Fourth, the fact that the loss in regional coral cover and concomitant changes to the benthic community are related to punctuated, discrete events with known causes (i.e. coral disease and bleaching), lends credence to the hypothesis that coral reefs of the Caribbean have been under assault from climate-change-related maladies since the 1970s.</p>","PeriodicalId":50950,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Marine Biology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/bs.amb.2020.08.008","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Marine Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.amb.2020.08.008","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/10/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

Caribbean reefs have experienced unprecedented changes in the past four decades. Of great concern is the perceived widespread shift from coral to macroalgal dominance and the question of whether it represents a new, stable equilibrium for coral-reef communities. The primary causes of the shift-grazing pressure (top-down), nutrient loading (bottom-up) or direct coral mortality (side-in)-still remain somewhat controversial in the coral-reef literature. We have attempted to tease out the relative importance of each of these causes. Four insights emerge from our analysis of an early regional dataset of information on the benthic composition of Caribbean reefs spanning the years 1977-2001. First, although three-quarters of reef sites have experienced coral declines concomitant with macroalgal increases, fewer than 10% of the more than 200 sites studied were dominated by macroalgae in 2001, by even the most conservative definition of dominance. Using relative dominance as the threshold, a total of 49 coral-to-macroalgae shifts were detected. This total represents ~35% of all sites that were dominated by coral at the start of their monitoring periods. Four shifts (8.2%) occurred because of coral loss with no change in macroalgal cover, 15 (30.6%) occurred because of macroalgal gain without coral loss, and 30 (61.2%) occurred owing to concomitant coral decline and macroalgal increase. Second, the timing of shifts at the regional scale is most consistent with the side-in model of reef degradation, which invokes coral mortality as a precursor to macroalgal takeover, because more shifts occurred after regional coral-mortality events than expected by chance. Third, instantaneous observations taken at the start and end of the time-series for individual sites showed these reefs existed along a continuum of coral and macroalgal cover. The continuous, broadly negative relationship between coral and macroalgal cover suggests that in some cases coral-to-macroalgae phase shifts may be reversed by removing sources of perturbation or restoring critical components such as the herbivorous sea urchin Diadema antillarum to the system. The five instances in which macroalgal dominance was reversed corroborate the conclusion that macroalgal dominance is not a stable, alternative community state as has been commonly assumed. Fourth, the fact that the loss in regional coral cover and concomitant changes to the benthic community are related to punctuated, discrete events with known causes (i.e. coral disease and bleaching), lends credence to the hypothesis that coral reefs of the Caribbean have been under assault from climate-change-related maladies since the 1970s.

加勒比海珊瑚礁生态变化的时间和因果关系。
在过去的四十年里,加勒比海的珊瑚礁经历了前所未有的变化。令人极为关切的是,从珊瑚向大型藻类主导的普遍转变,以及它是否代表珊瑚礁群落的一种新的、稳定的平衡的问题。这种变化的主要原因——放牧压力(自上而下)、营养负荷(自下而上)或珊瑚直接死亡(侧面)——在珊瑚礁文献中仍然存在一些争议。我们试图梳理出每一个原因的相对重要性。我们对1977-2001年间加勒比海珊瑚礁底栖生物组成信息的早期区域数据集进行了分析,得出了四个见解。首先,尽管四分之三的珊瑚礁地点经历了伴随着大型藻类增加的珊瑚减少,但在2001年研究的200多个地点中,即使按照最保守的优势定义,大型藻类占主导地位的地点也不到10%。以相对优势度为阈值,共检测到49种珊瑚向大型藻类的转变。这一总数约占监测期开始时珊瑚占主导地位的所有地点的35%。4个(8.2%)变化是由于珊瑚减少而大藻覆盖没有变化,15个(30.6%)变化是由于大藻增加而没有珊瑚损失,30个(61.2%)变化是由于珊瑚减少而大藻增加。其次,区域尺度上的变化时间与珊瑚礁退化的侧面模型最为一致,该模型将珊瑚死亡作为大型藻类接管的前兆,因为在区域珊瑚死亡事件之后发生的变化比偶然预期的要多。第三,在时间序列开始和结束时对个别地点进行的瞬时观测表明,这些珊瑚礁是沿着珊瑚和大型藻类覆盖的连续体存在的。珊瑚和大型藻类覆盖之间持续的、广泛的负相关关系表明,在某些情况下,通过消除干扰源或恢复系统中的关键组成部分,如草食性海胆Diadema antillarum,可以逆转珊瑚到大型藻类的相移。大藻优势被逆转的五个实例证实了大藻优势不是一个稳定的、可替代的群落状态,这是通常假设的。第四,区域珊瑚覆盖面积的减少以及随之发生的底栖生物群落的变化与断断续续的、离散的事件有关,这些事件具有已知的原因(即珊瑚疾病和白化),这一事实证明,自1970年代以来,加勒比地区的珊瑚礁一直受到与气候变化有关的疾病的攻击。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Advances in Marine Biology
Advances in Marine Biology MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY-
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Advances in Marine Biology was first published in 1963 under the founding editorship of Sir Frederick S. Russell, FRS. Now edited by Charles Sheppard, the serial publishes in-depth and up-to-date reviews on a wide range of topics which will appeal to postgraduates and researchers in marine biology, fisheries science, ecology, zoology and biological oceanography. Eclectic volumes in the series are supplemented by thematic volumes on such topics as The Biology of Calanoid Copepods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信