A cross-sectional survey of fertility knowledge in obstetrics and gynecology residents.

Leah May Roberts, Rashmi Kudesia, Huaqing Zhao, Shaliz Dolan, Marisa Rose
{"title":"A cross-sectional survey of fertility knowledge in obstetrics and gynecology residents.","authors":"Leah May Roberts,&nbsp;Rashmi Kudesia,&nbsp;Huaqing Zhao,&nbsp;Shaliz Dolan,&nbsp;Marisa Rose","doi":"10.1186/s40738-020-00091-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To evaluate fertility knowledge among current Obstetrics and Gynecology (OB-GYN) residents using a recently published validated instrument, the Fertility and Infertility Treatment Knowledge Score (FIT-KS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>OB-GYN residents in the United States were recruited through an email to all residency coordinators nationwide. They were asked to voluntarily respond to a short questionnaire including demographic information and the FIT-KS instrument, through an online survey platform. Of approximately 5000 OB-GYN residents in the country, 177 responded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sample was 91% female, with 69% between the ages of 26 and 30. Participants evenly represented all 4 years of training. Mean FIT-KS score was 21.2 (73% correct; range 17-26). No statistically significant differences were noted across the level of training. Several knowledge gaps were noted. Residents could define the common assisted reproductive technologies; however overestimated their success rates per cycle.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Substantial gaps exist in fertility knowledge among OB-GYN residents, with understanding of male fertility and success rates of Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ART) being particularly limited. Knowledge of fertility does not change throughout residency training, demonstrating consistent gaps in fertility knowledge. Knowledge during post graduate year (PGY)-1 year is consistent with mean scores found in prior research in Internal Medicine residents (65%), as well as a cohort of female medical students and obstetrics and gynecology residents and fellows (64.9%) (Fertil Steril 108:711-7, 2017; Fertil Steril 110:e239, 2018).</p>","PeriodicalId":87254,"journal":{"name":"Fertility research and practice","volume":"6 1","pages":"22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s40738-020-00091-2","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fertility research and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40738-020-00091-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Background: To evaluate fertility knowledge among current Obstetrics and Gynecology (OB-GYN) residents using a recently published validated instrument, the Fertility and Infertility Treatment Knowledge Score (FIT-KS).

Methods: OB-GYN residents in the United States were recruited through an email to all residency coordinators nationwide. They were asked to voluntarily respond to a short questionnaire including demographic information and the FIT-KS instrument, through an online survey platform. Of approximately 5000 OB-GYN residents in the country, 177 responded.

Results: The sample was 91% female, with 69% between the ages of 26 and 30. Participants evenly represented all 4 years of training. Mean FIT-KS score was 21.2 (73% correct; range 17-26). No statistically significant differences were noted across the level of training. Several knowledge gaps were noted. Residents could define the common assisted reproductive technologies; however overestimated their success rates per cycle.

Conclusions: Substantial gaps exist in fertility knowledge among OB-GYN residents, with understanding of male fertility and success rates of Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ART) being particularly limited. Knowledge of fertility does not change throughout residency training, demonstrating consistent gaps in fertility knowledge. Knowledge during post graduate year (PGY)-1 year is consistent with mean scores found in prior research in Internal Medicine residents (65%), as well as a cohort of female medical students and obstetrics and gynecology residents and fellows (64.9%) (Fertil Steril 108:711-7, 2017; Fertil Steril 110:e239, 2018).

Abstract Image

妇产科住院医师生育知识的横断面调查。
背景:使用最近发布的一种经过验证的工具——生育和不孕症治疗知识评分(FIT-KS)来评估当前妇产科(OB-GYN)住院医师的生育知识。方法:通过向全国所有住院医师协调员发送电子邮件的方式招募美国妇产科住院医师。他们被要求通过在线调查平台自愿回答一份简短的问卷,其中包括人口统计信息和FIT-KS工具。在全国大约5000名妇产科医生中,有177人做出了回应。结果:样本中91%为女性,其中69%年龄在26 - 30岁之间。参与者平均代表了所有4年的训练。FIT-KS平均得分为21.2分(73%正确率;范围17-26)。在不同的训练水平上没有统计学上的显著差异。注意到若干知识空白。居民可以定义常见的辅助生殖技术;然而高估了他们每个周期的成功率。结论:妇产科住院医师在生育知识方面存在较大差距,对男性生育能力和辅助生殖技术(ART)成功率的了解尤其有限。在整个住院医师培训过程中,生育知识并没有改变,这表明在生育知识方面存在一致的差距。研究生一年(PGY)-1年的知识与先前研究中内科住院医师(65%)以及女医学生和妇产科住院医师和研究员(64.9%)的平均得分一致(Fertil Steril 108:711- 7,2017;中国农业科学学报,2018,31 (2);
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信