Using the Robson Classification to Explain the Fluctuations in Cesarean Section.

IF 3.2 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Journal of Pregnancy Pub Date : 2020-11-12 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2020/2793296
H Cammu, E Martens, G Van Maele
{"title":"Using the Robson Classification to Explain the Fluctuations in Cesarean Section.","authors":"H Cammu, E Martens, G Van Maele","doi":"10.1155/2020/2793296","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>As the rate of cesarean sections (CS) continues to rise in Flanders (northern part of Belgium), it is important to understand the reasons behind this evolution and to find ways to achieve appropriate CS rates. For this analysis, we categorized CS changes between 1992 and 2016, applying the Robson 10-Group Classification System (TGCS). We also applied the TGCS to analyze the information of the only clinics where between 2008 and 2016, the absolute CS rate had fallen by more than two percent.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This paper is based on a population-based cross-sectional study. Robson's TGCS was used to analyze CS rates for the years 1992, 2000, 2008, and 2016, using the Flemish population-based birth register.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between 1992 and 2016, the overall CS rate increased from 11.8% in 1992 to 20.9% in 2016. The major contributors to that increase were (a) single, cephalic nulliparous women, at term in spontaneous labor (Robson group 1); (b) single, cephalic nulliparous women, at term in induced labor or CS before labor (group 2); and (c) multiparous women with single cephalic at term pregnancy with history of CS (group 5). In the subgroup of the seven clinics where the collective CS rate had decreased from 23.2% in 2008 to 19.3% in 2016, the main contributors to this decrease were Robson groups 1 and 2.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The CS increase in Flanders between 1992 and 2016 is mainly the result of the absolute CS increase in the childbirth of nulliparous women with a single cephalic baby at term in spontaneous or induced labor and in women with a single cephalic presentation at term and a previous CS. Further research in these aforementioned groups is needed to identify the real reasons for the CS increase.</p>","PeriodicalId":47062,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pregnancy","volume":"2020 ","pages":"2793296"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7679201/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pregnancy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/2793296","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: As the rate of cesarean sections (CS) continues to rise in Flanders (northern part of Belgium), it is important to understand the reasons behind this evolution and to find ways to achieve appropriate CS rates. For this analysis, we categorized CS changes between 1992 and 2016, applying the Robson 10-Group Classification System (TGCS). We also applied the TGCS to analyze the information of the only clinics where between 2008 and 2016, the absolute CS rate had fallen by more than two percent.

Methods: This paper is based on a population-based cross-sectional study. Robson's TGCS was used to analyze CS rates for the years 1992, 2000, 2008, and 2016, using the Flemish population-based birth register.

Results: Between 1992 and 2016, the overall CS rate increased from 11.8% in 1992 to 20.9% in 2016. The major contributors to that increase were (a) single, cephalic nulliparous women, at term in spontaneous labor (Robson group 1); (b) single, cephalic nulliparous women, at term in induced labor or CS before labor (group 2); and (c) multiparous women with single cephalic at term pregnancy with history of CS (group 5). In the subgroup of the seven clinics where the collective CS rate had decreased from 23.2% in 2008 to 19.3% in 2016, the main contributors to this decrease were Robson groups 1 and 2.

Conclusions: The CS increase in Flanders between 1992 and 2016 is mainly the result of the absolute CS increase in the childbirth of nulliparous women with a single cephalic baby at term in spontaneous or induced labor and in women with a single cephalic presentation at term and a previous CS. Further research in these aforementioned groups is needed to identify the real reasons for the CS increase.

使用罗布森分类法解释剖腹产的波动。
目的:随着佛兰德斯(比利时北部)地区剖宫产率(CS)的持续上升,了解这一变化背后的原因并找到实现适当剖宫产率的方法非常重要。在本次分析中,我们采用罗布森 10 组分类系统(TGCS)对 1992 年至 2016 年间的 CS 变化进行了分类。我们还应用 TGCS 分析了 2008 年至 2016 年间 CS 绝对值下降超过 2% 的唯一诊所的信息:本文基于一项基于人群的横断面研究。本文基于一项基于人口的横断面研究,利用弗拉芒人口出生登记册,使用罗布森 TGCS 分析了 1992、2000、2008 和 2016 年的婴儿出生率:结果:1992 年至 2016 年间,总体 CS 率从 1992 年的 11.8%上升至 2016 年的 20.9%。造成这一增长的主要原因是:(a)自然分娩的单头位非足月产妇女(罗布森第1组);(b)引产或分娩前CS的单头位非足月产妇女(第2组);以及(c)有CS史的单头位足月多胎妊娠妇女(第5组)。在七家诊所的子组中,CS的集体发生率从2008年的23.2%下降到2016年的19.3%,造成这一下降的主要原因是罗布森1组和2组:1992年至2016年期间,佛兰德的CS增加主要是自然分娩或引产的单头足月无痛分娩妇女以及单头足月分娩且曾有过CS的妇女的CS绝对值增加的结果。需要对上述群体进行进一步研究,以确定 CS 增加的真正原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Pregnancy
Journal of Pregnancy OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Pregnancy is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies related to all aspects of pregnancy and childbirth. The journal welcomes submissions on breastfeeding, labor, maternal health and the biomedical aspects of pregnancy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信