Handgrip Strength as a Complementary Test for Mobility Limitations Assessment in Acutely Hospitalized Oldest Old.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Rejuvenation research Pub Date : 2021-06-01 Epub Date: 2021-01-07 DOI:10.1089/rej.2020.2344
Robinson Ramírez-Vélez, Mikel L Sáez de Asteasu, Nicolás Martínez-Velilla, Fabricio Zambom-Ferraresi, Antonio García-Hermoso, Mikel Izquierdo
{"title":"Handgrip Strength as a Complementary Test for Mobility Limitations Assessment in Acutely Hospitalized Oldest Old.","authors":"Robinson Ramírez-Vélez,&nbsp;Mikel L Sáez de Asteasu,&nbsp;Nicolás Martínez-Velilla,&nbsp;Fabricio Zambom-Ferraresi,&nbsp;Antonio García-Hermoso,&nbsp;Mikel Izquierdo","doi":"10.1089/rej.2020.2344","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Clinically viable screening tools for detecting individuals at heightened risk for mobility limitations is warranted. However, it remains unclear in acutely hospitalized patients (>75 years) whether handgrip strength might be a good predictor for \"proxy\" muscle strength. To examine the reliability and validity of handgrip strength test in acute hospitalized older adults in comparison with other standardized muscular strength tests, and to examine its ability to discriminate between presence and absence of mobility limitations. Cross-sectional study. A total of 234 patients (mean age 87.0 years, 46% women) admitted to a tertiary public hospital between 2016 and 2017 were recruited. Maximal (one repetition maximum) and power muscle output of the upper and lower extremity along with functional capacity (as assessed with Barthel index and the Short Physical Performance Battery [SPPB]), and cognitive function was measured at admission. Functional impairment (mobility limitations) was defined at SPPB ≤7 points. Pearson's correlation and multivariable linear regression were evaluated between handgrip test and maximal and muscle power output as the reference method to assess concurrent validity. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was used to estimate handgrip strength cutoff point for likelihood of mobility limitations to assess predictive validity. Findings show moderate-to-strong correlations between standardized muscular strength (reference methods) and handgrip strength test (<i>r</i> = 0.534-0.725). All muscular strength tests show moderate accuracy (area under curve >0.7). Handgrip strength shows the higher positive predictive value (87%) and, therefore, a lower number of false positives. The overall handgrip strength cutoff point for likelihood of mobility limitations was 18.4 kg for men and women. Handgrip strength may be a useful tool for detecting acutely hospitalized older who are at risk of mobility limitations and could aid in focusing interventions on those with higher risk. Randomized clinical trial: NCT02300896.</p>","PeriodicalId":20979,"journal":{"name":"Rejuvenation research","volume":"24 3","pages":"213-219"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1089/rej.2020.2344","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rejuvenation research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/rej.2020.2344","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

Clinically viable screening tools for detecting individuals at heightened risk for mobility limitations is warranted. However, it remains unclear in acutely hospitalized patients (>75 years) whether handgrip strength might be a good predictor for "proxy" muscle strength. To examine the reliability and validity of handgrip strength test in acute hospitalized older adults in comparison with other standardized muscular strength tests, and to examine its ability to discriminate between presence and absence of mobility limitations. Cross-sectional study. A total of 234 patients (mean age 87.0 years, 46% women) admitted to a tertiary public hospital between 2016 and 2017 were recruited. Maximal (one repetition maximum) and power muscle output of the upper and lower extremity along with functional capacity (as assessed with Barthel index and the Short Physical Performance Battery [SPPB]), and cognitive function was measured at admission. Functional impairment (mobility limitations) was defined at SPPB ≤7 points. Pearson's correlation and multivariable linear regression were evaluated between handgrip test and maximal and muscle power output as the reference method to assess concurrent validity. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was used to estimate handgrip strength cutoff point for likelihood of mobility limitations to assess predictive validity. Findings show moderate-to-strong correlations between standardized muscular strength (reference methods) and handgrip strength test (r = 0.534-0.725). All muscular strength tests show moderate accuracy (area under curve >0.7). Handgrip strength shows the higher positive predictive value (87%) and, therefore, a lower number of false positives. The overall handgrip strength cutoff point for likelihood of mobility limitations was 18.4 kg for men and women. Handgrip strength may be a useful tool for detecting acutely hospitalized older who are at risk of mobility limitations and could aid in focusing interventions on those with higher risk. Randomized clinical trial: NCT02300896.

握力作为急性住院老年人活动限制评估的补充测试。
有必要使用临床可行的筛查工具来检测行动受限高风险个体。然而,对于急性住院患者(>75岁),目前尚不清楚握力是否可能是“代理”肌肉力量的良好预测因子。检验握力测试在急性住院老年人中与其他标准化肌肉力量测试的信度和效度,并检验其区分是否存在活动受限的能力。横断面研究。在2016年至2017年期间,共招募了234名在三级公立医院住院的患者(平均年龄87.0岁,46%为女性)。入院时测量上肢和下肢的最大肌输出量(一次最大重复)和力量肌输出量以及功能容量(用Barthel指数和短体能测试[SPPB]评估)和认知功能。SPPB≤7分为功能障碍(活动能力受限)。采用Pearson相关和多变量线性回归方法评价握力测试与最大和肌肉力量输出之间的相关性,作为评估并发效度的参考方法。受试者操作特征分析用于估计手部握力临界值,以评估活动受限可能性的预测效度。结果显示,标准化肌肉力量(参考方法)与握力测试之间存在中强相关性(r = 0.534-0.725)。所有肌肉力量测试显示中等准确度(曲线下面积>0.7)。握力显示出较高的阳性预测值(87%),因此,假阳性的数量较少。男性和女性的整体握力临界值为18.4 kg。握力可能是一种有用的工具,用于检测有行动受限风险的急性住院老年人,并有助于将干预重点放在风险较高的老年人身上。随机临床试验:NCT02300896。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Rejuvenation research
Rejuvenation research 医学-老年医学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Rejuvenation Research publishes cutting-edge, peer-reviewed research on rejuvenation therapies in the laboratory and the clinic. The Journal focuses on key explorations and advances that may ultimately contribute to slowing or reversing the aging process, and covers topics such as cardiovascular aging, DNA damage and repair, cloning, and cell immortalization and senescence. Rejuvenation Research coverage includes: Cell immortalization and senescence Pluripotent stem cells DNA damage/repair Gene targeting, gene therapy, and genomics Growth factors and nutrient supply/sensing Immunosenescence Comparative biology of aging Tissue engineering Late-life pathologies (cardiovascular, neurodegenerative and others) Public policy and social context.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信