The measurement properties of the Lean-and-Release test in people with incomplete spinal cord injury or disease.

The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine Pub Date : 2022-05-01 Epub Date: 2020-12-02 DOI:10.1080/10790268.2020.1847562
Janelle Unger, Alison R Oates, Joel Lanovaz, Katherine Chan, Jae W Lee, Pirashanth Theventhiran, Kei Masani, Kristin E Musselman
{"title":"The measurement properties of the Lean-and-Release test in people with incomplete spinal cord injury or disease.","authors":"Janelle Unger,&nbsp;Alison R Oates,&nbsp;Joel Lanovaz,&nbsp;Katherine Chan,&nbsp;Jae W Lee,&nbsp;Pirashanth Theventhiran,&nbsp;Kei Masani,&nbsp;Kristin E Musselman","doi":"10.1080/10790268.2020.1847562","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate test-retest reliability, agreement, and convergent validity of the Lean-and-Release test for the assessment of reactive stepping among individuals with incomplete spinal cord injury or disease (iSCI/D).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Multi-center cross-sectional multiple test design.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>SCI/D rehabilitation hospital and biomechanics laboratory.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Individuals with motor incomplete SCI/D (iSCI/D).</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures: </strong>Twenty-six participants attended two sessions to complete the Lean-and-Release test and a battery of clinical tests. Behavioral (<i>i.e.</i> one-step, multi-step, loss of balance) and temporal (<i>i.e.</i> timing of foot off, foot contact, swing of reactive step) parameters were measured. Test-retest reliability was determined with intraclass correlation coefficients, and agreement was evaluated with Bland-Altman plots. Convergent validity was assessed through correlations with clinical tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The behavioral responses were reliable for the Lean-and-Release test (ICC = 0.76), but foot contact was the only reliable temporal parameter using data from a single site (ICC = 0.79). All variables showed agreement according to the Bland-Altman plots. The behavioral responses correlated with scores of lower extremity strength (0.54, P<0.01) and balance confidence (0.55, P < 0.01). Swing time of reactive stepping correlated with step time (0.73, P < 0.01) and cadence (-0.73 P < 0.01) of over ground walking.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The behavioral response of the Lean-and-Release test is a reliable and valid measure for people with iSCI/D. Our findings support the use of the behavioral responses to evaluate reactive stepping for research and clinical purposes.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02960178.</p>","PeriodicalId":501560,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"426-435"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10790268.2020.1847562","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10790268.2020.1847562","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/12/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate test-retest reliability, agreement, and convergent validity of the Lean-and-Release test for the assessment of reactive stepping among individuals with incomplete spinal cord injury or disease (iSCI/D).

Design: Multi-center cross-sectional multiple test design.

Setting: SCI/D rehabilitation hospital and biomechanics laboratory.

Participants: Individuals with motor incomplete SCI/D (iSCI/D).

Interventions: None.

Outcome measures: Twenty-six participants attended two sessions to complete the Lean-and-Release test and a battery of clinical tests. Behavioral (i.e. one-step, multi-step, loss of balance) and temporal (i.e. timing of foot off, foot contact, swing of reactive step) parameters were measured. Test-retest reliability was determined with intraclass correlation coefficients, and agreement was evaluated with Bland-Altman plots. Convergent validity was assessed through correlations with clinical tests.

Results: The behavioral responses were reliable for the Lean-and-Release test (ICC = 0.76), but foot contact was the only reliable temporal parameter using data from a single site (ICC = 0.79). All variables showed agreement according to the Bland-Altman plots. The behavioral responses correlated with scores of lower extremity strength (0.54, P<0.01) and balance confidence (0.55, P < 0.01). Swing time of reactive stepping correlated with step time (0.73, P < 0.01) and cadence (-0.73 P < 0.01) of over ground walking.

Conclusions: The behavioral response of the Lean-and-Release test is a reliable and valid measure for people with iSCI/D. Our findings support the use of the behavioral responses to evaluate reactive stepping for research and clinical purposes.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02960178.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

不完全性脊髓损伤或疾病患者的倾斜-释放试验的测量特性
目的:评估不完全脊髓损伤或疾病(iSCI/D)患者反应性步进评估的Lean-and-Release试验的重测信度、一致性和收敛效度。设计:多中心横截面多重试验设计。单位:SCI/D康复医院和生物力学实验室。参与者:运动不完全性SCI/D (iSCI/D)患者。干预措施:没有。结果测量:26名参与者参加了两次会议,以完成精益-释放测试和一系列临床测试。测量行为参数(即一步、多步、失去平衡)和时间参数(即离脚时间、足部接触、反应步摆动)。用类内相关系数确定重测信度,用Bland-Altman图评估一致性。通过与临床试验的相关性来评估收敛效度。结果:行为反应在Lean-and-Release测试中是可靠的(ICC = 0.76),但脚部接触是唯一可靠的时间参数(ICC = 0.79)。根据Bland-Altman图,所有变量显示一致。行为反应与下肢力量得分相关(0.54,p)。结论:倾斜-释放试验的行为反应对iSCI/D患者是一种可靠、有效的测量方法。我们的研究结果支持使用行为反应来评估反应性步进的研究和临床目的。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT02960178。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信