Evaluating farm-level livestock interventions in low-income countries: a scoping review of what works, how, and why.

IF 4.3 2区 农林科学 Q1 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Animal Health Research Reviews Pub Date : 2020-12-01 Epub Date: 2020-12-02 DOI:10.1017/S1466252320000146
Johanna F Lindahl, Florence Mutua, Delia Grace
{"title":"Evaluating farm-level livestock interventions in low-income countries: a scoping review of what works, how, and why.","authors":"Johanna F Lindahl,&nbsp;Florence Mutua,&nbsp;Delia Grace","doi":"10.1017/S1466252320000146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Livestock interventions can improve nutrition, health, and economic well-being of communities. The objectives of this review were to identify and characterize livestock interventions in developing countries and to assess their effectiveness in achieving development outcomes. A scoping review, guided by a search strategy, was conducted. Papers needed to be written in English, published in peer-reviewed journals, and describe interventions in animal health and production. Out of 2739 publications systematically screened at the title, abstract, and full publication levels, 70 met our inclusion criteria and were considered in the study. Eight relatively high-quality papers were identified and added, resulting in 78 reviewed publications. Only 15 studies used randomized controlled trial designs making it possible to confidently link interventions with the resulting outcomes. Eight studies had human nutrition or health as outcomes, 11 focused on disease control, and four were on livestock production. Eight interventions were considered successful, but only four were scalable. We found good evidence that livestock-transfer programs, leveraging livestock products for nutrition, and helping farmers manage priority diseases, can improve human well-being. Our report highlights challenges in garnering evidence for livestock interventions in developing countries and provides suggestions on how to improve the quantity and quality of future evaluations.</p>","PeriodicalId":51313,"journal":{"name":"Animal Health Research Reviews","volume":"21 2","pages":"108-121"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/S1466252320000146","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal Health Research Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1466252320000146","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/12/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Livestock interventions can improve nutrition, health, and economic well-being of communities. The objectives of this review were to identify and characterize livestock interventions in developing countries and to assess their effectiveness in achieving development outcomes. A scoping review, guided by a search strategy, was conducted. Papers needed to be written in English, published in peer-reviewed journals, and describe interventions in animal health and production. Out of 2739 publications systematically screened at the title, abstract, and full publication levels, 70 met our inclusion criteria and were considered in the study. Eight relatively high-quality papers were identified and added, resulting in 78 reviewed publications. Only 15 studies used randomized controlled trial designs making it possible to confidently link interventions with the resulting outcomes. Eight studies had human nutrition or health as outcomes, 11 focused on disease control, and four were on livestock production. Eight interventions were considered successful, but only four were scalable. We found good evidence that livestock-transfer programs, leveraging livestock products for nutrition, and helping farmers manage priority diseases, can improve human well-being. Our report highlights challenges in garnering evidence for livestock interventions in developing countries and provides suggestions on how to improve the quantity and quality of future evaluations.

评估低收入国家农场一级的牲畜干预措施:对有效措施、方式和原因的范围审查。
牲畜干预可以改善社区的营养、健康和经济福祉。本次审查的目的是确定和描述发展中国家的牲畜干预措施,并评估其在实现发展成果方面的有效性。在搜索策略的指导下进行了范围审查。论文需要用英文撰写,发表在同行评议的期刊上,并描述对动物健康和生产的干预措施。在2739篇按标题、摘要和全文进行系统筛选的出版物中,有70篇符合我们的纳入标准,被纳入本研究。确定并添加了8篇相对高质量的论文,共审阅了78篇论文。只有15项研究使用了随机对照试验设计,这使得可以自信地将干预措施与结果联系起来。8项研究的结果是人类营养或健康,11项研究的重点是疾病控制,4项研究的重点是牲畜生产。8项干预措施被认为是成功的,但只有4项是可扩展的。我们发现了充分的证据,表明牲畜转移项目、利用牲畜产品获取营养、帮助农民管理重点疾病,能够改善人类福祉。我们的报告强调了在发展中国家为牲畜干预措施收集证据方面面临的挑战,并就如何提高未来评估的数量和质量提出了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Animal Health Research Reviews
Animal Health Research Reviews VETERINARY SCIENCES-
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
期刊介绍: Animal Health Research Reviews provides an international forum for the publication of reviews and commentaries on all aspects of animal health. Papers include in-depth analyses and broader overviews of all facets of health and science in both domestic and wild animals. Major subject areas include physiology and pharmacology, parasitology, bacteriology, food and environmental safety, epidemiology and virology. The journal is of interest to researchers involved in animal health, parasitologists, food safety experts and academics interested in all aspects of animal production and welfare.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信