Impact of non-medical switching of prescription medications on health outcomes: an e-survey of high-volume medicare and medicaid physician providers.

Q2 Medicine
Craig Coleman, Tabassum Salam, Amy Duhig, Aarti A Patel, Ann Cameron, Jennifer Voelker, Brahim Bookhart
{"title":"Impact of non-medical switching of prescription medications on health outcomes: an e-survey of high-volume medicare and medicaid physician providers.","authors":"Craig Coleman,&nbsp;Tabassum Salam,&nbsp;Amy Duhig,&nbsp;Aarti A Patel,&nbsp;Ann Cameron,&nbsp;Jennifer Voelker,&nbsp;Brahim Bookhart","doi":"10.1080/20016689.2020.1829883","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Non-medical switching refers to a change in a stable patient's prescribed medication to a clinically distinct, non-generic, alternative for reasons other than poor clinical response, side-effects or non-adherence.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the perceptions of high-volume Medicare and/or Medicaid physician providers regarding the impact non-medical switching has on their patients' medication-related outcomes and health-care utilization.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed an e-survey of high-volume Medicare and/or Medicaid physicians (spending >50% of their time caring for Medicare and/or Medicaid patients), practicing for >2 years but <30 years post-residency and/or fellowship; working in a general, internal, family medicine or specialist setting; spending ≥40% of their time providing direct care and having received ≥1 request for a non-medical switch in the past 12 months. Physicians were queried on 15-items to assess perceptions regarding the impact non-medical switching on medication-related outcomes and health-care utilization.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three-hundred and fifty physicians were included. Respondents reported they felt non-medical switching, to some degree, increased side-effects (54.0%), medication errors (56.0%) and medication abandonment (60.3%), and ~50% believed it increased patients' out-of-pocket costs. Few physicians (≤13.4% for each) felt non-medical switching had a positive impact on effectiveness, adherence or patients' or physicians' confidence in the quality-of-care provided. Non-office visit and prescriber-pharmacy contact were most frequently thought to increase due to non-medical switching. One-third of physicians felt office visits were very frequently/frequently increased, and ~ 1-in-5 respondents believed laboratory testing and additional medication use very frequently/frequently increased following a non-medical switch. About 1-in-10 physicians felt non-medical switching very frequently/frequently increased the utilization of emergency department or in-hospital care.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study suggests high-volume Medicare and/or Medicaid physician providers perceive multiple negative influences of non-medical switching on medication-related outcomes and health-care utilization.</p>","PeriodicalId":73811,"journal":{"name":"Journal of market access & health policy","volume":"8 1","pages":"1829883"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/20016689.2020.1829883","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of market access & health policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20016689.2020.1829883","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background: Non-medical switching refers to a change in a stable patient's prescribed medication to a clinically distinct, non-generic, alternative for reasons other than poor clinical response, side-effects or non-adherence.

Objective: To assess the perceptions of high-volume Medicare and/or Medicaid physician providers regarding the impact non-medical switching has on their patients' medication-related outcomes and health-care utilization.

Methods: We performed an e-survey of high-volume Medicare and/or Medicaid physicians (spending >50% of their time caring for Medicare and/or Medicaid patients), practicing for >2 years but <30 years post-residency and/or fellowship; working in a general, internal, family medicine or specialist setting; spending ≥40% of their time providing direct care and having received ≥1 request for a non-medical switch in the past 12 months. Physicians were queried on 15-items to assess perceptions regarding the impact non-medical switching on medication-related outcomes and health-care utilization.

Results: Three-hundred and fifty physicians were included. Respondents reported they felt non-medical switching, to some degree, increased side-effects (54.0%), medication errors (56.0%) and medication abandonment (60.3%), and ~50% believed it increased patients' out-of-pocket costs. Few physicians (≤13.4% for each) felt non-medical switching had a positive impact on effectiveness, adherence or patients' or physicians' confidence in the quality-of-care provided. Non-office visit and prescriber-pharmacy contact were most frequently thought to increase due to non-medical switching. One-third of physicians felt office visits were very frequently/frequently increased, and ~ 1-in-5 respondents believed laboratory testing and additional medication use very frequently/frequently increased following a non-medical switch. About 1-in-10 physicians felt non-medical switching very frequently/frequently increased the utilization of emergency department or in-hospital care.

Conclusion: This study suggests high-volume Medicare and/or Medicaid physician providers perceive multiple negative influences of non-medical switching on medication-related outcomes and health-care utilization.

处方药的非医疗转换对健康结果的影响:对大量医疗保险和医疗补助医生提供者的电子调查。
背景:非医学转换是指由于临床反应差、副作用或不依从性以外的原因,将稳定的患者处方药物改为临床独特的非通用替代药物。目的:评估大量医疗保险和/或医疗补助医师对非医疗转换对患者药物相关结局和医疗保健利用的影响的看法。方法:我们对执业时间>2年的大量医疗保险和/或医疗补助医生(花费>50%的时间照顾医疗保险和/或医疗补助患者)进行了电子调查,但结果:包括350名医生。受访者表示,他们认为非医疗转换在某种程度上增加了副作用(54.0%)、用药错误(56.0%)和药物放弃(60.3%),约50%的人认为它增加了患者的自付费用。很少有医生(各≤13.4%)认为非医疗转换对有效性、依从性或患者或医生对所提供的护理质量的信心有积极影响。非办公室访问和处方药房联系最常被认为是由于非医疗转换而增加的。三分之一的医生认为办公室就诊非常频繁/频繁增加,约五分之一的受访者认为,在非医疗转换后,实验室检测和额外药物使用非常频繁/频繁增加。大约十分之一的医生认为非医疗转换非常频繁/频繁地增加了对急诊科或院内护理的利用。结论:本研究表明,大量医疗保险和/或医疗补助的医师提供者意识到非医疗转换对药物相关结果和医疗保健利用的多重负面影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信