Antithrombotic therapy according to baseline bleeding risk in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: applying the PRECISE-DAPT score in RE-DUAL PCI.

Francesco Costa, Marco Valgimigli, Philippe Gabriel Steg, Deepak L Bhatt, Stefan H Hohnloser, Jurrien M Ten Berg, Corinna Miede, Matias Nordaby, Gregory Y H Lip, Jonas Oldgren, Christopher P Cannon
{"title":"Antithrombotic therapy according to baseline bleeding risk in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: applying the PRECISE-DAPT score in RE-DUAL PCI.","authors":"Francesco Costa,&nbsp;Marco Valgimigli,&nbsp;Philippe Gabriel Steg,&nbsp;Deepak L Bhatt,&nbsp;Stefan H Hohnloser,&nbsp;Jurrien M Ten Berg,&nbsp;Corinna Miede,&nbsp;Matias Nordaby,&nbsp;Gregory Y H Lip,&nbsp;Jonas Oldgren,&nbsp;Christopher P Cannon","doi":"10.1093/ehjcvp/pvaa135","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing coronary intervention are at higher bleeding risk due to the concomitant need for oral anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapy. The RE-DUAL PCI trial demonstrated better safety with dual antithrombotic therapy (DAT: dabigatran 110 or 150 mg b.i.d., clopidogrel or ticagrelor) compared to triple antithrombotic therapy (TAT: warfarin, clopidogrel or ticagrelor, and aspirin). We explored the impact of baseline bleeding risk based on the PRECISE-DAPT score for decision-making regarding DAT vs. TAT.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>A score ≥25 points qualified high bleeding risk (HBR). Comparisons were made for the primary safety endpoint International Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasis major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding, and the composite efficacy endpoint of death, thrombo-embolic events, or unplanned revascularization, analysed by time-to-event analysis. PRECISE-DAPT was available in 2336/2725 patients, and 37.9% were HBR. Compared to TAT, DAT with dabigatran 110 mg reduced bleeding risk both in non-HBR [hazard ratio (HR) 0.42, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.31-0.57] and HBR (HR 0.70, 95% CI 0.52-0.94), with a greater magnitude of benefit among non-HBR (Pint = 0.02). Dual antithrombotic therapy with dabigatran 150 mg vs. TAT reduced bleeding in non-HBR (HR 0.60, 95% CI 0.45-0.80), with a trend toward less benefit in HBR patients (HR 0.92, 95% CI 0.63-1.34; Pint = 0.08). The risk of ischaemic events was similar on DAT with dabigatran (both 110 and 150 mg) vs. TAT in non-HBR and HBR patients (Pint = 0.45 and Pint = 0.56, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PRECISE-DAPT score appeared useful to identify AF patients undergoing PCI at further increased risk of bleeding complications and may help clinicians identifying the antithrombotic regimen intensity with the best benefit-risk ratio in an individual patient.</p>","PeriodicalId":11995,"journal":{"name":"European Heart Journal — Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy","volume":" ","pages":"216-226"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/ehjcvp/pvaa135","citationCount":"19","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Heart Journal — Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjcvp/pvaa135","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

Abstract

Aims: Patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing coronary intervention are at higher bleeding risk due to the concomitant need for oral anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapy. The RE-DUAL PCI trial demonstrated better safety with dual antithrombotic therapy (DAT: dabigatran 110 or 150 mg b.i.d., clopidogrel or ticagrelor) compared to triple antithrombotic therapy (TAT: warfarin, clopidogrel or ticagrelor, and aspirin). We explored the impact of baseline bleeding risk based on the PRECISE-DAPT score for decision-making regarding DAT vs. TAT.

Methods and results: A score ≥25 points qualified high bleeding risk (HBR). Comparisons were made for the primary safety endpoint International Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasis major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding, and the composite efficacy endpoint of death, thrombo-embolic events, or unplanned revascularization, analysed by time-to-event analysis. PRECISE-DAPT was available in 2336/2725 patients, and 37.9% were HBR. Compared to TAT, DAT with dabigatran 110 mg reduced bleeding risk both in non-HBR [hazard ratio (HR) 0.42, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.31-0.57] and HBR (HR 0.70, 95% CI 0.52-0.94), with a greater magnitude of benefit among non-HBR (Pint = 0.02). Dual antithrombotic therapy with dabigatran 150 mg vs. TAT reduced bleeding in non-HBR (HR 0.60, 95% CI 0.45-0.80), with a trend toward less benefit in HBR patients (HR 0.92, 95% CI 0.63-1.34; Pint = 0.08). The risk of ischaemic events was similar on DAT with dabigatran (both 110 and 150 mg) vs. TAT in non-HBR and HBR patients (Pint = 0.45 and Pint = 0.56, respectively).

Conclusions: PRECISE-DAPT score appeared useful to identify AF patients undergoing PCI at further increased risk of bleeding complications and may help clinicians identifying the antithrombotic regimen intensity with the best benefit-risk ratio in an individual patient.

根据经皮冠状动脉介入治疗房颤患者基线出血风险进行抗血栓治疗:在RE-DUAL PCI中应用precision - dapt评分
目的:接受冠状动脉介入治疗的房颤患者由于同时需要口服抗凝和抗血小板治疗,出血风险较高。RE-DUAL PCI试验表明,与三重抗血栓治疗(华法林、氯吡格雷或替卡格雷和阿司匹林)相比,双重抗血栓治疗(DAT:达比加群,每日110或150毫克,氯吡格雷或替卡格雷)的安全性更好。我们探讨了基于precision - dapt评分的基线出血风险对DAT和TAT决策的影响。方法和结果:评分≥25分为高出血风险(HBR)。比较国际血栓与止血学会主要出血或临床相关的非主要出血的主要安全性终点,以及死亡、血栓栓塞事件或计划外血运重建术的综合疗效终点,通过时间-事件分析进行分析。2336/2725例患者中有precision - dapt, 37.9%为HBR。与TAT相比,达比加群110 mg DAT降低了非HBR和HBR的出血风险[危险比(HR) 0.42, 95%可信区间(CI) 0.31-0.57]和HBR (HR 0.70, 95% CI 0.52-0.94),非HBR的获益幅度更大(Pint = 0.02)。达比加群150mg双重抗血栓治疗与TAT相比,非HBR患者出血减少(HR 0.60, 95% CI 0.45-0.80), HBR患者获益较少(HR 0.92, 95% CI 0.63-1.34;品脱= 0.08)。在非HBR和HBR患者中,达比加群(110和150 mg)与TAT相比,DAT组缺血性事件的风险相似(Pint = 0.45和Pint = 0.56)。结论:precision - dapt评分似乎有助于识别接受PCI的出血并发症风险进一步增加的房颤患者,并可能帮助临床医生确定个体患者中具有最佳获益-风险比的抗血栓治疗方案强度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信