Cost-Effectiveness of Passion Fruit Albedo versus Turmeric in the Glycemic and Lipaemic Control of People with Type 2 Diabetes: Randomized Clinical Trial.

IF 3.4 4区 医学 Q2 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Danilo Ferreira de Sousa, Márcio Flávio Moura de Araújo, Vanessa Derenji de Mello, Marta Maria Coelho Damasceno, Roberto Wagner Júnior Freire de Freitas
{"title":"Cost-Effectiveness of Passion Fruit Albedo versus Turmeric in the Glycemic and Lipaemic Control of People with Type 2 Diabetes: Randomized Clinical Trial.","authors":"Danilo Ferreira de Sousa,&nbsp;Márcio Flávio Moura de Araújo,&nbsp;Vanessa Derenji de Mello,&nbsp;Marta Maria Coelho Damasceno,&nbsp;Roberto Wagner Júnior Freire de Freitas","doi":"10.1080/07315724.2020.1823909","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Robust evidence has related yellow passion fruit albedo and long turmeric to the metabolic and glycemic control of diabetes.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To analyze the incremental cost-effectiveness of the flour made from yellow passion fruit albedo <i>versus</i> long turmeric merged with piperine in the glycemic and lipid control of individuals with type 2 diabetes.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Eighty-nine patients were enrolled in this randomized, placebo-controlled, clinical trial for 120 days. The first group was prescribed 500 mg capsules, three times a day, of yellow passion fruit albedo flour (FAMA). The second group was prescribed long turmeric capsules (500 mg), merged with piperine (5 mg) (CURPI), at fasting. The third group followed the standard advice recommendations, and ingested a placebo of carboxymethyl cellulose (500 mg) at fasting.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The group using FAMA showed a higher reduction (-5.9%) of glycemia after fasting, compared to placebo (+9%), and CURPI (-3.2%) (p < 0.05). Regarding HbA1c, the study observed a significant and similar statistical reduction (-0.8%) in the intervention groups, in contrast with the placebo group (p < 0.05). The reduction in HOMA-IR in the CURPI group (-9.4%) was higher than the other groups (p < 0.05). The CURPI group also showed a higher reduction of serum triglyceride levels (-20.8%) compared to the placebo (-0.09%) and FAMA (+1.8%) (p < 0.05) groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>It was concluded that turmeric is the most cost-effective in comparison with yellow passion fruit albedo, because of its decrease in the levels of triglycerides and HOMA-IR, even when adjusted for confounding variables. On the other hand, HbA1c cost-effectiveness relation was similar.</p>","PeriodicalId":17193,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American College of Nutrition","volume":"40 8","pages":"679-688"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/07315724.2020.1823909","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American College of Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07315724.2020.1823909","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/11/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

Background: Robust evidence has related yellow passion fruit albedo and long turmeric to the metabolic and glycemic control of diabetes.

Aim: To analyze the incremental cost-effectiveness of the flour made from yellow passion fruit albedo versus long turmeric merged with piperine in the glycemic and lipid control of individuals with type 2 diabetes.

Method: Eighty-nine patients were enrolled in this randomized, placebo-controlled, clinical trial for 120 days. The first group was prescribed 500 mg capsules, three times a day, of yellow passion fruit albedo flour (FAMA). The second group was prescribed long turmeric capsules (500 mg), merged with piperine (5 mg) (CURPI), at fasting. The third group followed the standard advice recommendations, and ingested a placebo of carboxymethyl cellulose (500 mg) at fasting.

Results: The group using FAMA showed a higher reduction (-5.9%) of glycemia after fasting, compared to placebo (+9%), and CURPI (-3.2%) (p < 0.05). Regarding HbA1c, the study observed a significant and similar statistical reduction (-0.8%) in the intervention groups, in contrast with the placebo group (p < 0.05). The reduction in HOMA-IR in the CURPI group (-9.4%) was higher than the other groups (p < 0.05). The CURPI group also showed a higher reduction of serum triglyceride levels (-20.8%) compared to the placebo (-0.09%) and FAMA (+1.8%) (p < 0.05) groups.

Conclusion: It was concluded that turmeric is the most cost-effective in comparison with yellow passion fruit albedo, because of its decrease in the levels of triglycerides and HOMA-IR, even when adjusted for confounding variables. On the other hand, HbA1c cost-effectiveness relation was similar.

百香果反照率与姜黄在2型糖尿病患者血糖和血脂控制中的成本-效果:随机临床试验
背景:强有力的证据表明,黄百香果反照率和长姜黄与糖尿病的代谢和血糖控制有关。目的:分析由黄百香果反照率制成的面粉与长姜黄与胡椒碱混合制成的面粉在控制2型糖尿病患者血糖和血脂方面的增量成本效益。方法:89例患者参加了这项随机、安慰剂对照的临床试验,为期120天。第一组服用黄百香果反照粉胶囊500毫克,每天三次。第二组在禁食时服用姜黄长胶囊(500毫克),与胡椒碱(5毫克)(CURPI)合并。第三组遵循标准建议,在禁食时摄入羧甲基纤维素(500毫克)的安慰剂。结果:与安慰剂组(+9%)和CURPI组(-3.2%)相比,使用FAMA组空腹后血糖下降(-5.9%)更高(p结论:与黄色百香果反射率相比,姜黄是最具成本效益的,因为它降低了甘油三酯和HOMA-IR水平,即使在调整了混杂变量后也是如此。另一方面,糖化血红蛋白成本-效果关系相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American College of Nutrition accepts the following types of submissions: Original and innovative research in nutrition science with useful application for researchers, physicians, nutritionists, and other healthcare professionals with emphasis on discoveries which help to individualize or "personalize" nutrition science; Critical reviews on pertinent nutrition topics that highlight key teaching points and relevance to nutrition; Letters to the editors and commentaries on important issues in the field of nutrition; Abstract clusters on nutritional topics with editorial comments; Book reviews; Abstracts from the annual meeting of the American College of Nutrition in the October issue.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信