[The coronavirus pandemic-a politically explosive catastropheLa pandémie de coronavirus - une catastrophe explosive].

IF 1.2 3区 社会学 Q3 SOCIOLOGY
Berliner Journal Fur Soziologie Pub Date : 2020-01-01 Epub Date: 2020-11-23 DOI:10.1007/s11609-020-00416-4
Klaus Dörre
{"title":"[The coronavirus pandemic-a politically explosive catastropheLa pandémie de coronavirus - une catastrophe explosive].","authors":"Klaus Dörre","doi":"10.1007/s11609-020-00416-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The corona pandemic is a medical catastrophe that is intricately intertwined with an epochal economic-ecological double or \"pincer-grip\" crisis - thus goes the central thesis of this contribution. COVID-19 is defined as an \"external shock\" followed by a deep recession. Leaving aside the natural process of viral mutation, the pandemic, recession and pincer-grip crisis can be understood as distinct repulsions of an hyperglobalization that is gradually undermining its own conditions of existence. Meanwhile, the recent rupture cannot be adequately grasped without taking into account the financial crash of 2007 to 2009, the political interregnum of the post-crisis years and the tendency towards bonapartistic democracy. By itself, the corona crisis will not lead to a \"build back better\"; the emergency state is hardly capable of such a setting of the course. Instead, there is a rising danger that fierce conflicts over distribution, increasing inequality and desolidarization will make a turn to sustainability even harder.</p>","PeriodicalId":51909,"journal":{"name":"Berliner Journal Fur Soziologie","volume":"30 2","pages":"165-190"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s11609-020-00416-4","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Berliner Journal Fur Soziologie","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11609-020-00416-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/11/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

The corona pandemic is a medical catastrophe that is intricately intertwined with an epochal economic-ecological double or "pincer-grip" crisis - thus goes the central thesis of this contribution. COVID-19 is defined as an "external shock" followed by a deep recession. Leaving aside the natural process of viral mutation, the pandemic, recession and pincer-grip crisis can be understood as distinct repulsions of an hyperglobalization that is gradually undermining its own conditions of existence. Meanwhile, the recent rupture cannot be adequately grasped without taking into account the financial crash of 2007 to 2009, the political interregnum of the post-crisis years and the tendency towards bonapartistic democracy. By itself, the corona crisis will not lead to a "build back better"; the emergency state is hardly capable of such a setting of the course. Instead, there is a rising danger that fierce conflicts over distribution, increasing inequality and desolidarization will make a turn to sustainability even harder.

Abstract Image

冠状病毒大流行——一场政治上爆炸性的灾难
冠状病毒大流行是一场医学灾难,与一场划时代的经济-生态双重危机或“钳子式”危机错综复杂地交织在一起——这就是本书的中心论点。新冠肺炎被定义为“外部冲击”,随后是深度衰退。撇开病毒变异的自然过程不谈,大流行、经济衰退和钳子式危机可以被理解为对正在逐渐破坏其自身生存条件的超级全球化的不同排斥。与此同时,如果不考虑2007年至2009年的金融危机、危机后几年的政治间歇期以及波拿巴式民主的趋势,就无法充分把握最近的破裂。冠状病毒危机本身不会带来“更好的重建”;紧急状态几乎不具备这样一种设定航向的能力。相反,一种日益上升的危险是,围绕分配的激烈冲突、日益加剧的不平等和边缘化,将使转向可持续发展变得更加困难。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
27.30%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: Berliner Journal für Soziologie (“Berlin Journal of Sociology”), edited by the Institute of Sociology at the Friedrich Schiller University Jena and the Institute of Social Sciences at the Humboldt University Berlin, publishes double-blind peer-reviewed articles on classical and modern theoretical approaches, essays on current problem areas of sociological discourse, and research notes presenting new empirical findings. Focussed issues and review essays reflect innovative developments within the German and international social sciences and inform about the state of research in central areas of sociology. The journal was founded in 1991 on the initiative of the East German Society of Sociology. It views itself as a general sociological journal that publishes contributions from all research and subject areas of sociology. From the very beginning, the programmatic aim has been to provide a forum for the discussion and further development of sociological problems in the light of contemporary theoretical and social developments. Two major topics have been at the journal''s core and will continue to shape its contents in the future: Transformation and Culture. The journal deals with the socio-ecological upheaval that modern societies are undergoing. Globalisation, changes in working society and lifestyles, digitalisation, social conflicts up to new wars, new challenges for democracy, populism and nationalism as well as gender relations are important topics of a renewed Great Transformation. Cultural sociology and comparative cultural research deal with developments in these fields in a special way. The BJS therefore continues to devote its attention to such perspectives.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信