Postural Stability and Muscle Activation Onset during Double- to Single-Leg Stance Transition in Flat-Footed Individuals.

IF 2.4
Journal of sports science & medicine Pub Date : 2020-11-19 eCollection Date: 2020-12-01
Yuta Koshino, Mina Samukawa, Shuya Chida, Shinpei Okada, Hirono Tanaka, Kentaro Watanabe, Masato Chijimatsu, Masanori Yamanaka, Harukazu Tohyama
{"title":"Postural Stability and Muscle Activation Onset during Double- to Single-Leg Stance Transition in Flat-Footed Individuals.","authors":"Yuta Koshino,&nbsp;Mina Samukawa,&nbsp;Shuya Chida,&nbsp;Shinpei Okada,&nbsp;Hirono Tanaka,&nbsp;Kentaro Watanabe,&nbsp;Masato Chijimatsu,&nbsp;Masanori Yamanaka,&nbsp;Harukazu Tohyama","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The effects of foot posture on postural stability and on muscular activation pattern for postural control remain unclear. This study aimed to investigate postural stability and muscular activation onset during the transition task from double- to single-leg stance in individuals with different foot postures. Twenty-seven healthy men (age: 21.5 ± 1.5 years) were divided into 3 groups using the Foot Posture Index: neutral foot (n = 10); flatfoot (n = 8); and high-arched foot (n = 9). Center of pressure (COP) data and muscle activation onset times of the tibialis anterior, peroneus longus, gastrocnemius medialis, and soleus during the transition task with eyes closed were compared among groups using one-way analysis of variance and a post-hoc Tukey honestly significant difference test (p < 0.05) when the data were normally distributed and the Kruskal-Wallis test and a post-hoc Mann-Whitney U-test with Bonferroni correction (p < 0.0167) when the data were not normally distributed. The COP displacements in the mediolateral and anteroposterior directions and the resultant COP displacement during the first 3 s after a stability time point, as determined by sequential estimation during the single-leg stance phase, differed significantly among the three groups (p < 0.05). Post-hoc tests showed that the displacements were significantly greater in the flatfoot group than in the neutral and high-arched foot groups (p < 0.05), and the effect sizes for these results were large. No muscular activation onset times showed significant intergroup differences. Postural stability was significantly decreased only in the flatfoot group, while muscle activation onsets did not differ significantly by foot posture during the transition task. Decreased postural stability may be one mechanism underlying the link between flatfoot and risk of lower limb injury, and foot posture represents a potential confounder for measuring postural stability during the transition task.</p>","PeriodicalId":520691,"journal":{"name":"Journal of sports science & medicine","volume":" ","pages":"662-669"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7675622/pdf/jssm-19-662.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of sports science & medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The effects of foot posture on postural stability and on muscular activation pattern for postural control remain unclear. This study aimed to investigate postural stability and muscular activation onset during the transition task from double- to single-leg stance in individuals with different foot postures. Twenty-seven healthy men (age: 21.5 ± 1.5 years) were divided into 3 groups using the Foot Posture Index: neutral foot (n = 10); flatfoot (n = 8); and high-arched foot (n = 9). Center of pressure (COP) data and muscle activation onset times of the tibialis anterior, peroneus longus, gastrocnemius medialis, and soleus during the transition task with eyes closed were compared among groups using one-way analysis of variance and a post-hoc Tukey honestly significant difference test (p < 0.05) when the data were normally distributed and the Kruskal-Wallis test and a post-hoc Mann-Whitney U-test with Bonferroni correction (p < 0.0167) when the data were not normally distributed. The COP displacements in the mediolateral and anteroposterior directions and the resultant COP displacement during the first 3 s after a stability time point, as determined by sequential estimation during the single-leg stance phase, differed significantly among the three groups (p < 0.05). Post-hoc tests showed that the displacements were significantly greater in the flatfoot group than in the neutral and high-arched foot groups (p < 0.05), and the effect sizes for these results were large. No muscular activation onset times showed significant intergroup differences. Postural stability was significantly decreased only in the flatfoot group, while muscle activation onsets did not differ significantly by foot posture during the transition task. Decreased postural stability may be one mechanism underlying the link between flatfoot and risk of lower limb injury, and foot posture represents a potential confounder for measuring postural stability during the transition task.

平足个体双腿到单腿站立转换时的姿势稳定性和肌肉激活。
足部姿势对体位稳定性和体位控制的肌肉激活模式的影响尚不清楚。本研究旨在探讨不同足部姿势的个体在双腿站姿到单腿站姿转换任务时的姿势稳定性和肌肉激活情况。27例健康男性(年龄21.5±1.5岁),采用足部姿势指数分为3组:中性足(n = 10);扁平足(n = 8);胫骨前肌、腓骨长肌、腓肠肌内侧肌的压力中心(COP)数据和肌肉激活发作时间。数据正态分布时采用单因素方差分析和事后Tukey显著性差异检验(p < 0.05),非正态分布时采用Kruskal-Wallis检验和事后Mann-Whitney u检验(p < 0.0167)进行校正。通过单腿站立阶段的顺序估计,在稳定时间点后的前3 s内,中外侧和前后方向的COP位移以及由此产生的COP位移在三组之间差异显著(p < 0.05)。事后检验显示,平足组的位移明显大于中性足组和高弓足组(p < 0.05),这些结果的效应量很大。肌肉激活起始时间组间无显著差异。只有平足组的姿势稳定性显著降低,而在过渡任务中,不同的足部姿势的肌肉激活发作没有显著差异。姿势稳定性下降可能是扁平足与下肢损伤风险之间联系的一种机制,而足部姿势代表了在过渡任务中测量姿势稳定性的潜在混杂因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书