[Pharmacogenetic testing in acute and chronic pain: a preliminary study].

IF 0.4 Q3 Medicine
Panella Lorenzo, Laura Volonté, Nicola Poloni, Antonello Caserta, Marta Ielmini, Ivano Caselli, Giulia Lucca, Camilla Callegari
{"title":"[Pharmacogenetic testing in acute and chronic pain: a preliminary study].","authors":"Panella Lorenzo,&nbsp;Laura Volonté,&nbsp;Nicola Poloni,&nbsp;Antonello Caserta,&nbsp;Marta Ielmini,&nbsp;Ivano Caselli,&nbsp;Giulia Lucca,&nbsp;Camilla Callegari","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Summary: </strong>Background. Pain is one of the most common symptoms that weighs on life's quality and health expenditure. In a reality in which increasingly personalized therapies are needed, the early use of genetic tests that highlight the individual response to analgesic drugs could be a valuable help in clinical practice helping to reduce response times, to achieve a good level of analgesia and to reduce the risk of side effects and adverse events. The study aims to confront the clinical response to analgesic drugs with the result of pharmacogenetic testing in patients with persistent pain. Methods. This preliminary study compares the genetic results of pharmacological effectiveness and tolerability analyzed with a Pharmacogenetic Test with the results obtained in clinical practice in 5 patients suffering from acute and chronic pain. Results. Regarding the genetic results of the 5 samples analyzed, 2 reports were found to be completely comparable to what found in clinical practice, while 3 reports showed that the profile of tolerability and effectiveness were partially discordant. Conclusions. In light of the data, not completely overlapping with results observed in clinical practice, further studies would be appropriate in order to acquire more information on the use of the PGT in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":12674,"journal":{"name":"Giornale italiano di medicina del lavoro ed ergonomia","volume":"42 3","pages":"208-212"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Giornale italiano di medicina del lavoro ed ergonomia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Summary: Background. Pain is one of the most common symptoms that weighs on life's quality and health expenditure. In a reality in which increasingly personalized therapies are needed, the early use of genetic tests that highlight the individual response to analgesic drugs could be a valuable help in clinical practice helping to reduce response times, to achieve a good level of analgesia and to reduce the risk of side effects and adverse events. The study aims to confront the clinical response to analgesic drugs with the result of pharmacogenetic testing in patients with persistent pain. Methods. This preliminary study compares the genetic results of pharmacological effectiveness and tolerability analyzed with a Pharmacogenetic Test with the results obtained in clinical practice in 5 patients suffering from acute and chronic pain. Results. Regarding the genetic results of the 5 samples analyzed, 2 reports were found to be completely comparable to what found in clinical practice, while 3 reports showed that the profile of tolerability and effectiveness were partially discordant. Conclusions. In light of the data, not completely overlapping with results observed in clinical practice, further studies would be appropriate in order to acquire more information on the use of the PGT in clinical practice.

[急性和慢性疼痛的药物遗传学检测:初步研究]。
摘要:背景。疼痛是影响生活质量和健康支出的最常见症状之一。在越来越需要个性化治疗的现实中,早期使用基因测试,突出个体对镇痛药物的反应,可以在临床实践中提供宝贵的帮助,有助于减少反应时间,实现良好的镇痛水平,并减少副作用和不良事件的风险。该研究的目的是面对临床反应镇痛药物与药物遗传测试的结果,患者的持续疼痛。方法。本初步研究将5例急性和慢性疼痛患者的药理学有效性和耐受性的遗传学结果与临床实践结果进行了比较。结果。在分析的5个样本的遗传结果中,2个报告与临床完全一致,3个报告显示耐受性和有效性的情况部分不一致。结论。鉴于这些数据与临床实践中观察到的结果不完全重叠,为了获得更多关于PGT在临床实践中使用的信息,进一步的研究是合适的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Giornale italiano di medicina del lavoro ed ergonomia
Giornale italiano di medicina del lavoro ed ergonomia PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信