Warm-Up Intensity and Time Course Effects on Jump Performance.

IF 2.4
Journal of sports science & medicine Pub Date : 2020-11-19 eCollection Date: 2020-12-01
Ryo Tsurubami, Kensuke Oba, Mina Samukawa, Kazuki Takizawa, Itaru Chiba, Masanori Yamanaka, Harukazu Tohyama
{"title":"Warm-Up Intensity and Time Course Effects on Jump Performance.","authors":"Ryo Tsurubami,&nbsp;Kensuke Oba,&nbsp;Mina Samukawa,&nbsp;Kazuki Takizawa,&nbsp;Itaru Chiba,&nbsp;Masanori Yamanaka,&nbsp;Harukazu Tohyama","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Jump performance is affected by warm-up intensity and body temperature, but the time course effects have not been thoroughly investigated. The purpose of this study was to investigate time course effects on jump performance after warm-up at different intensities. Nine male athletes (age: 20.9 ± 1.0 years; height: 1.75 ± 0.03 m; weight: 66.4 ± 6.3 kg; mean ± SD) volunteered for this study. The participants performed three warm-ups at different intensities: 15 min at 80% VO<sub>2</sub> max, 15 min at 60% VO<sub>2</sub> max, and no warm-up (control). After each warm-up, counter movement jump (CMJ) height, vastus lateralis temperature, heart rate and subjective fatigue level were measured at three intervals: immediately after warm-up, 10 min after, and 20 min after, respectively. Significant main effects and interactions were found for muscle temperature (intensity: p < 0.01, η<sup>2</sup><sub>p</sub> = 0.909; time: p < 0.01, η<sup>2</sup><sub>p</sub> = 0.898; interaction: p < 0.01, η<sup>2</sup><sub>p</sub> = 0.917). There was a significant increase of muscle temperature from the baseline after warm-up, which lasted for 20 min after warm-up with 80% VO<sub>2</sub> max and 60% VO<sub>2</sub> max (p < 0.01). Muscle temperature was significantly higher with warm-up at 80% VO<sub>2</sub> max than other conditions (P < 0.01). Significant main effects and interactions for CMJ height were found (intensity: p < 0.01, η<sup>2</sup><sub>p</sub> = 0.762; time: p < 0.01, η<sup>2</sup><sub>p</sub> = 0.810; interaction: p < 0.01, η<sup>2</sup><sub>p</sub> = 0.696). Compared with the control conditions, CMJ height after 80% VO<sub>2</sub> max and 60% VO<sub>2</sub> max warm-ups were significantly higher (p < 0.01 and p < 0.05, respectively). CMJ height at 20 min after warm-up was significantly higher for 80% VO<sub>2</sub> max warm-up than for 60% VO<sub>2</sub> max warm-up (p < 0.01). However, CMJ height at 10 min after 60% VO<sub>2</sub> max warm-up was not significantly different from the baseline (p < 0.05). These results showed that both high and moderate intensity warm-up can maintain an increase in muscle temperature for 20 min. Jump performance after high-intensity warm-up was increased for 20 min compared to a moderate intensity warm-up.</p>","PeriodicalId":520691,"journal":{"name":"Journal of sports science & medicine","volume":" ","pages":"714-720"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7675624/pdf/jssm-19-714.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of sports science & medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Jump performance is affected by warm-up intensity and body temperature, but the time course effects have not been thoroughly investigated. The purpose of this study was to investigate time course effects on jump performance after warm-up at different intensities. Nine male athletes (age: 20.9 ± 1.0 years; height: 1.75 ± 0.03 m; weight: 66.4 ± 6.3 kg; mean ± SD) volunteered for this study. The participants performed three warm-ups at different intensities: 15 min at 80% VO2 max, 15 min at 60% VO2 max, and no warm-up (control). After each warm-up, counter movement jump (CMJ) height, vastus lateralis temperature, heart rate and subjective fatigue level were measured at three intervals: immediately after warm-up, 10 min after, and 20 min after, respectively. Significant main effects and interactions were found for muscle temperature (intensity: p < 0.01, η2p = 0.909; time: p < 0.01, η2p = 0.898; interaction: p < 0.01, η2p = 0.917). There was a significant increase of muscle temperature from the baseline after warm-up, which lasted for 20 min after warm-up with 80% VO2 max and 60% VO2 max (p < 0.01). Muscle temperature was significantly higher with warm-up at 80% VO2 max than other conditions (P < 0.01). Significant main effects and interactions for CMJ height were found (intensity: p < 0.01, η2p = 0.762; time: p < 0.01, η2p = 0.810; interaction: p < 0.01, η2p = 0.696). Compared with the control conditions, CMJ height after 80% VO2 max and 60% VO2 max warm-ups were significantly higher (p < 0.01 and p < 0.05, respectively). CMJ height at 20 min after warm-up was significantly higher for 80% VO2 max warm-up than for 60% VO2 max warm-up (p < 0.01). However, CMJ height at 10 min after 60% VO2 max warm-up was not significantly different from the baseline (p < 0.05). These results showed that both high and moderate intensity warm-up can maintain an increase in muscle temperature for 20 min. Jump performance after high-intensity warm-up was increased for 20 min compared to a moderate intensity warm-up.

热身强度和时间对跳跃成绩的影响。
跳远成绩受热身强度和体温的影响,但对时间过程的影响尚未深入研究。本研究的目的是探讨时间过程对不同强度热身后跳远成绩的影响。男运动员9名(年龄:20.9±1.0岁;高度:1.75±0.03 m;重量:66.4±6.3 kg;(平均±SD)自愿参加这项研究。参与者在不同强度下进行了三次热身:在80% VO2 max下15分钟,在60% VO2 max下15分钟,没有热身(对照组)。每次热身后,分别在热身后立即、10分钟后和20分钟后三个时间间隔测量反动作跳(CMJ)高度、股外侧肌温度、心率和主观疲劳水平。肌肉温度的主效应和交互作用显著(强度:p < 0.01, η2p = 0.909;时间:p < 0.01, η2p = 0.898;交互作用:p < 0.01, η2p = 0.917)。热身后肌肉温度较基线显著升高,并持续20 min,最大VO2为80%,最大VO2为60% (p < 0.01)。80% VO2 max热身组肌肉温度显著高于其他各组(P < 0.01)。CMJ高度的主效应和交互作用显著(强度:p < 0.01, η2p = 0.762;时间:p < 0.01, η2p = 0.810;交互作用:p < 0.01, η2p = 0.696)。与对照组相比,80% VO2 max和60% VO2 max热身后CMJ高度显著升高(p < 0.01和p < 0.05)。80% VO2最大热身组的CMJ高度显著高于60% VO2最大热身组(p < 0.01)。然而,60%最大摄氧量热身后10 min的CMJ高度与基线无显著差异(p < 0.05)。这些结果表明,高强度和中等强度的热身都可以保持20分钟的肌肉温度增加。与中等强度的热身相比,高强度热身后的跳跃性能提高了20分钟。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书