Breast Cancer Cryoablation: Assessment of the Impact of Fundamental Procedural Variables in an In Vitro Human Breast Cancer Model.

IF 1.8 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Breast Cancer : Basic and Clinical Research Pub Date : 2020-11-12 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1177/1178223420972363
Kristi K Snyder, Robert G Van Buskirk, John G Baust, John M Baust
{"title":"Breast Cancer Cryoablation: Assessment of the Impact of Fundamental Procedural Variables in an In Vitro Human Breast Cancer Model.","authors":"Kristi K Snyder, Robert G Van Buskirk, John G Baust, John M Baust","doi":"10.1177/1178223420972363","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Breast cancer is the most prominent form of cancer and the second leading cause of death in women behind lung cancer. The primary modes of treatment today include surgical excision (lumpectomy, mastectomy), radiation, chemoablation, anti-HER2/neu therapy, and/or hormone therapy. The severe side effects associated with these therapies suggest a minimally invasive therapy with fewer quality of life issues would be advantageous for treatment of this pervasive disease. Cryoablation has been used in the treatment of other cancers, including prostate, skin, and cervical, for decades and has been shown to be a successful minimally invasive therapeutic option. To this end, the use of cryotherapy for the treatment of breast cancer has increased over the last several years. Although successful, one of the challenges in cryoablation is management of cancer destruction in the periphery of the ice ball as the tissue within this outer margin may not experience ablative temperatures. In breast cancer, this is of concern due to the lobular nature of the tumors. As such, in this study, we investigated the level of cell death at various temperatures associated with the margin of a cryogenic lesion as well as the impact of repetitive freezing and thawing methods on overall efficacy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Human breast cancer cells, MCF-7, were exposed to temperatures of -5°C, -10°C, -15°C, -20°C, or -25°C for 5-minute freeze intervals in a single or repeat freeze-thaw cycle. Samples were thawed with either passive or active warming for 5 or 10 minutes. Samples were assessed at 1, 2, and 3 days post-freeze to assess cell survival and recovery. In addition, the modes of cell death associated with freezing were assessed over the initial 24-hour post-thaw recovery period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Exposure of MCF-7 cells to -5°C and -10°C resulted in minimal cell death regardless of the freeze/thaw conditions. Freezing to a temperature of -25°C resulted in complete cell death 1 day post-thaw with no cell recovery in all freeze/thaw scenarios evaluated. Exposure to a single freeze event resulted in a gradual increase in cell death at -15°C and -20°C. Application of a repeat freeze-thaw cycle (dual 5-minute freeze) resulted in an increase in cell death with complete destruction at -20°C and near complete death at -15°C (day 1 survival: single -15°C freeze/thaw = 20%; repeated -15°C freeze/thaw = 4%). Analysis of thaw interval time (5 vs 10 minute) demonstrated that the shorter 5-minute thaw interval between freezes resulted in increased cell destruction. Furthermore, investigation of thaw rate (active vs passive thawing) demonstrated that active thawing resulted in increased cell survival thereby less effective ablation compared with passive thawing (eg, -15°C 5/10/5 procedure survival, passive thaw: 4% vs active thaw: 29%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In summary, these in vitro findings suggest that freezing to temperatures of 25°C results in a high degree of breast cancer cell destruction. Furthermore, the data demonstrate that the application of a repeat freeze procedure with a passive 5-minute or 10-minute thaw interval between freeze cycles increases the minimal lethal temperature to the -15°C to -20°C range. The data also demonstrate that the use of an active thawing procedure between freezes reduces ablation efficacy at temperatures associated with the iceball periphery. These findings may be important to improving future clinical applications of cryoablation for the treatment of breast cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":9163,"journal":{"name":"Breast Cancer : Basic and Clinical Research","volume":"14 ","pages":"1178223420972363"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/66/81/10.1177_1178223420972363.PMC7672727.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Breast Cancer : Basic and Clinical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1178223420972363","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Breast cancer is the most prominent form of cancer and the second leading cause of death in women behind lung cancer. The primary modes of treatment today include surgical excision (lumpectomy, mastectomy), radiation, chemoablation, anti-HER2/neu therapy, and/or hormone therapy. The severe side effects associated with these therapies suggest a minimally invasive therapy with fewer quality of life issues would be advantageous for treatment of this pervasive disease. Cryoablation has been used in the treatment of other cancers, including prostate, skin, and cervical, for decades and has been shown to be a successful minimally invasive therapeutic option. To this end, the use of cryotherapy for the treatment of breast cancer has increased over the last several years. Although successful, one of the challenges in cryoablation is management of cancer destruction in the periphery of the ice ball as the tissue within this outer margin may not experience ablative temperatures. In breast cancer, this is of concern due to the lobular nature of the tumors. As such, in this study, we investigated the level of cell death at various temperatures associated with the margin of a cryogenic lesion as well as the impact of repetitive freezing and thawing methods on overall efficacy.

Methods: Human breast cancer cells, MCF-7, were exposed to temperatures of -5°C, -10°C, -15°C, -20°C, or -25°C for 5-minute freeze intervals in a single or repeat freeze-thaw cycle. Samples were thawed with either passive or active warming for 5 or 10 minutes. Samples were assessed at 1, 2, and 3 days post-freeze to assess cell survival and recovery. In addition, the modes of cell death associated with freezing were assessed over the initial 24-hour post-thaw recovery period.

Results: Exposure of MCF-7 cells to -5°C and -10°C resulted in minimal cell death regardless of the freeze/thaw conditions. Freezing to a temperature of -25°C resulted in complete cell death 1 day post-thaw with no cell recovery in all freeze/thaw scenarios evaluated. Exposure to a single freeze event resulted in a gradual increase in cell death at -15°C and -20°C. Application of a repeat freeze-thaw cycle (dual 5-minute freeze) resulted in an increase in cell death with complete destruction at -20°C and near complete death at -15°C (day 1 survival: single -15°C freeze/thaw = 20%; repeated -15°C freeze/thaw = 4%). Analysis of thaw interval time (5 vs 10 minute) demonstrated that the shorter 5-minute thaw interval between freezes resulted in increased cell destruction. Furthermore, investigation of thaw rate (active vs passive thawing) demonstrated that active thawing resulted in increased cell survival thereby less effective ablation compared with passive thawing (eg, -15°C 5/10/5 procedure survival, passive thaw: 4% vs active thaw: 29%).

Conclusions: In summary, these in vitro findings suggest that freezing to temperatures of 25°C results in a high degree of breast cancer cell destruction. Furthermore, the data demonstrate that the application of a repeat freeze procedure with a passive 5-minute or 10-minute thaw interval between freeze cycles increases the minimal lethal temperature to the -15°C to -20°C range. The data also demonstrate that the use of an active thawing procedure between freezes reduces ablation efficacy at temperatures associated with the iceball periphery. These findings may be important to improving future clinical applications of cryoablation for the treatment of breast cancer.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

乳腺癌冷冻消融术:评估体外人类乳腺癌模型中基本程序变量的影响。
导言:乳腺癌是最常见的癌症,也是仅次于肺癌的第二大女性死因。目前的主要治疗方法包括手术切除(肿块切除术、乳房切除术)、放射治疗、化疗、抗 HER2/neu 治疗和/或激素治疗。这些疗法都有严重的副作用,因此,微创疗法和较少的生活质量问题将是治疗这种普遍性疾病的优势所在。冷冻消融用于治疗其他癌症(包括前列腺癌、皮肤癌和宫颈癌)已有几十年的历史,并已被证明是一种成功的微创疗法。因此,在过去几年中,冷冻疗法在乳腺癌治疗中的应用越来越多。虽然冷冻消融术很成功,但它面临的挑战之一是如何处理冰球外围的癌症破坏,因为外围的组织可能不会感受到消融温度。在乳腺癌中,由于肿瘤的小叶性质,这一点令人担忧。因此,在本研究中,我们调查了在与低温病变边缘相关的各种温度下细胞死亡的程度,以及重复冷冻和解冻方法对总体疗效的影响。方法:将人类乳腺癌细胞 MCF-7 暴露在 -5°C、-10°C、-15°C、-20°C 或 -25°C 的温度下,以 5 分钟的冷冻间隔进行单次或重复冷冻-解冻循环。解冻样品时,可采用被动或主动加温方式,时间为 5 或 10 分钟。在冷冻后 1、2 和 3 天对样本进行评估,以评估细胞存活和恢复情况。此外,在解冻后最初 24 小时的恢复期内,还对与冷冻相关的细胞死亡模式进行了评估:结果:MCF-7细胞暴露在-5°C和-10°C的温度下,无论冻融条件如何,细胞死亡都极少。冷冻至-25°C会导致细胞在解冻后1天完全死亡,在所有评估的冷冻/解冻情况下细胞都不会恢复。在-15°C和-20°C条件下,单次冻融导致细胞死亡逐渐增加。重复冻融循环(双5分钟冻融)导致细胞死亡增加,在-20°C完全冻死,在-15°C几乎完全冻死(第1天存活率:单次-15°C冻融=20%;重复-15°C冻融=4%)。对解冻间隔时间(5 分钟与 10 分钟)的分析表明,两次冷冻之间较短的 5 分钟解冻间隔会导致细胞破坏加剧。此外,对解冻速率(主动解冻与被动解冻)的研究表明,与被动解冻相比,主动解冻会增加细胞存活率,从而降低消融效果(例如,-15°C 5/10/5 过程存活率,被动解冻:4% vs 主动解冻:29%):总之,这些体外研究结果表明,在 25°C 的温度下冷冻能高度破坏乳腺癌细胞。此外,数据还表明,采用重复冷冻程序,并在两次冷冻之间间隔 5 分钟或 10 分钟进行被动解冻,可将最低致死温度提高到 -15°C 至 -20°C 的范围。数据还表明,在两次冷冻之间使用主动解冻程序会降低冰球外围温度下的消融效果。这些发现可能对改善未来冷冻消融治疗乳腺癌的临床应用非常重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.40%
发文量
22
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Breast Cancer: Basic and Clinical Research is an international, open access, peer-reviewed, journal which considers manuscripts on all areas of breast cancer research and treatment. We welcome original research, short notes, case studies and review articles related to breast cancer-related research. Specific areas of interest include, but are not limited to, breast cancer sub types, pathobiology, metastasis, genetics and epigenetics, mammary gland biology, breast cancer models, prevention, detection, therapy and clinical interventions, and epidemiology and population genetics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信