Genetics-Related Activities in Everyday Practice of Family Physicians in Slovenia.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q4 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Public Health Genomics Pub Date : 2020-01-01 Epub Date: 2020-11-23 DOI:10.1159/000511561
Metka Cerovic, Borut Peterlin, Zalika Klemenc-Ketis
{"title":"Genetics-Related Activities in Everyday Practice of Family Physicians in Slovenia.","authors":"Metka Cerovic,&nbsp;Borut Peterlin,&nbsp;Zalika Klemenc-Ketis","doi":"10.1159/000511561","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Development of genomic technologies has an important impact on patient management in medicine. Nevertheless, translation of new advances of genomic medicine in primary care is challenging and needs to be adapted to the needs of health systems.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study was to analyze the current state of the use and the level of confidence in genetic management activities in everyday clinical practice of family practitioners (FPs) in Slovenia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used a cross-sectional observational study design. The dataset was obtained through a questionnaire containing demographics, questions about the use of genetics in everyday practice, and a scale for measuring the responders' confidence in their ability to carry out basic genetic activities during patient treatment. The questionnaire was sent by regular mail to every FP in Slovenia (N = 950).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The questionnaire was completed by a total of 271 physicians (response rate 28.5%), with an average physicians' age of 45.5 ± 10.6 years. In their everyday clinical practice, the majority of Slovenian FPs report to encounter genetic conditions more than once a month (241, 91.2%). Family medical history is the most commonly used among all activities related to genetic management of patients. Only 5.9% of Slovenian FPs are confident in their ability to carry out basic activities related to genetic patient management. Most of them believe they are only competent enough to obtain family medical history and identify a positive family history. The FPs who reported a lower degree of confidence are those with the lowest level of education in the field of medical genetics and older physicians (age >50 years).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Slovenian family physicians commonly encounter patients with genetic conditions but are not confident in their ability to carry out basic medical genetic tasks. Therefore, additional education is necessary.</p>","PeriodicalId":49650,"journal":{"name":"Public Health Genomics","volume":"23 5-6","pages":"230-236"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000511561","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health Genomics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000511561","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/11/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction: Development of genomic technologies has an important impact on patient management in medicine. Nevertheless, translation of new advances of genomic medicine in primary care is challenging and needs to be adapted to the needs of health systems.

Objective: The objective of this study was to analyze the current state of the use and the level of confidence in genetic management activities in everyday clinical practice of family practitioners (FPs) in Slovenia.

Methods: We used a cross-sectional observational study design. The dataset was obtained through a questionnaire containing demographics, questions about the use of genetics in everyday practice, and a scale for measuring the responders' confidence in their ability to carry out basic genetic activities during patient treatment. The questionnaire was sent by regular mail to every FP in Slovenia (N = 950).

Results: The questionnaire was completed by a total of 271 physicians (response rate 28.5%), with an average physicians' age of 45.5 ± 10.6 years. In their everyday clinical practice, the majority of Slovenian FPs report to encounter genetic conditions more than once a month (241, 91.2%). Family medical history is the most commonly used among all activities related to genetic management of patients. Only 5.9% of Slovenian FPs are confident in their ability to carry out basic activities related to genetic patient management. Most of them believe they are only competent enough to obtain family medical history and identify a positive family history. The FPs who reported a lower degree of confidence are those with the lowest level of education in the field of medical genetics and older physicians (age >50 years).

Conclusions: Slovenian family physicians commonly encounter patients with genetic conditions but are not confident in their ability to carry out basic medical genetic tasks. Therefore, additional education is necessary.

遗传学相关活动在斯洛文尼亚家庭医生的日常实践。
基因组技术的发展对医学患者管理产生了重要影响。然而,将基因组医学的新进展转化为初级保健具有挑战性,需要适应卫生系统的需要。目的:本研究的目的是分析斯洛文尼亚家庭医生(FPs)日常临床实践中遗传管理活动的使用现状和信心水平。方法:采用横断面观察性研究设计。该数据集是通过一份调查问卷获得的,该问卷包含人口统计数据、关于遗传学在日常实践中使用的问题,以及用于测量应答者对其在患者治疗期间开展基本遗传活动的能力的信心的量表。问卷通过普通邮件发送到斯洛文尼亚的每个FP (N = 950)。结果:共271名医师完成问卷调查,应答率28.5%,平均年龄45.5±10.6岁。在他们的日常临床实践中,大多数斯洛文尼亚FPs报告每月遇到遗传疾病超过一次(241,91.2%)。在所有与患者遗传管理相关的活动中,家族病史是最常用的。只有5.9%的斯洛文尼亚FPs对其开展与遗传患者管理相关的基本活动的能力有信心。他们中的大多数人认为他们只能够获得家族病史并确定阳性家族史。报告信心程度较低的FPs是那些在医学遗传学领域受教育程度最低的人和年龄较大的医生(年龄>50岁)。结论:斯洛文尼亚家庭医生经常遇到有遗传病的患者,但对他们执行基本医学遗传任务的能力缺乏信心。因此,额外的教育是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Public Health Genomics
Public Health Genomics 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: ''Public Health Genomics'' is the leading international journal focusing on the timely translation of genome-based knowledge and technologies into public health, health policies, and healthcare as a whole. This peer-reviewed journal is a bimonthly forum featuring original papers, reviews, short communications, and policy statements. It is supplemented by topic-specific issues providing a comprehensive, holistic and ''all-inclusive'' picture of the chosen subject. Multidisciplinary in scope, it combines theoretical and empirical work from a range of disciplines, notably public health, molecular and medical sciences, the humanities and social sciences. In so doing, it also takes into account rapid scientific advances from fields such as systems biology, microbiomics, epigenomics or information and communication technologies as well as the hight potential of ''big data'' for public health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信