Psychological Practice at Six Months of COVID-19: A Follow-Up to the First National Survey of Psychologists During the Pandemic.

Journal of health service psychology Pub Date : 2020-01-01 Epub Date: 2020-11-15 DOI:10.1007/s42843-020-00024-z
Morgan T Sammons, Gary R VandenBos, Jana N Martin, Daniel M Elchert
{"title":"Psychological Practice at Six Months of COVID-19: A Follow-Up to the First National Survey of Psychologists During the Pandemic.","authors":"Morgan T Sammons,&nbsp;Gary R VandenBos,&nbsp;Jana N Martin,&nbsp;Daniel M Elchert","doi":"10.1007/s42843-020-00024-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We conducted a survey of licensed psychologists at two weeks and again at six months after the declaration of a national emergency related to the COVID-19 pandemic. This article describes the results of the second survey conducted approximately six months after the crisis began. The rapid shift to telepsychological services seen in the first survey in the pandemic has solidified in the second survey. More providers reported delivering a larger percentage of services via telepsychology than early in the pandemic. The majority of respondents do not anticipate resuming in-person services until after a vaccine is made available, although a consistent minority reports ongoing in-person service provision. A majority reported their patients had appropriate access to internet and telepsychological service platforms, although one-fifth of respondents reported their patients had difficulty accessing such services. Early concerns about technological or regulatory problems involved in telepsychology are no longer evident. Most respondents indicated they will continue to use telepsychological services for the delivery of some of their psychological services after the pandemic ends. Forty-five percent knew of individuals who contracted the disease, 13% knew someone who died of the disease, and 2% reported contracted the disease themselves.</p>","PeriodicalId":73770,"journal":{"name":"Journal of health service psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s42843-020-00024-z","citationCount":"19","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of health service psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s42843-020-00024-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/11/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

Abstract

We conducted a survey of licensed psychologists at two weeks and again at six months after the declaration of a national emergency related to the COVID-19 pandemic. This article describes the results of the second survey conducted approximately six months after the crisis began. The rapid shift to telepsychological services seen in the first survey in the pandemic has solidified in the second survey. More providers reported delivering a larger percentage of services via telepsychology than early in the pandemic. The majority of respondents do not anticipate resuming in-person services until after a vaccine is made available, although a consistent minority reports ongoing in-person service provision. A majority reported their patients had appropriate access to internet and telepsychological service platforms, although one-fifth of respondents reported their patients had difficulty accessing such services. Early concerns about technological or regulatory problems involved in telepsychology are no longer evident. Most respondents indicated they will continue to use telepsychological services for the delivery of some of their psychological services after the pandemic ends. Forty-five percent knew of individuals who contracted the disease, 13% knew someone who died of the disease, and 2% reported contracted the disease themselves.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

COVID-19六个月的心理实践:大流行期间首次全国心理学家调查的后续行动。
我们在宣布COVID-19大流行相关的国家紧急状态后两周和六个月对持牌心理学家进行了调查。本文描述了在危机开始大约六个月后进行的第二次调查的结果。在大流行期间的第一次调查中看到的向远程心理服务的迅速转变在第二次调查中得到巩固。更多的提供者报告说,与大流行早期相比,通过远程心理提供的服务比例更高。大多数答复者预计在提供疫苗之前不会恢复上门服务,尽管少数人一致报告继续提供上门服务。大多数受访者表示,他们的患者可以适当地使用互联网和远程心理服务平台,尽管五分之一的受访者表示,他们的患者难以获得此类服务。早期对涉及远程心理学的技术或监管问题的担忧已不再明显。大多数答复者表示,在大流行结束后,他们将继续利用远程心理服务提供部分心理服务。45%的人知道谁感染了这种疾病,13%的人知道谁死于这种疾病,2%的人报告自己感染了这种疾病。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信