Dendritic Voltage Recordings Explain Paradoxical Synaptic Plasticity: A Modeling Study.

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
Frontiers in Synaptic Neuroscience Pub Date : 2020-11-02 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fnsyn.2020.585539
Claire Meissner-Bernard, Matthias Chinyen Tsai, Laureline Logiaco, Wulfram Gerstner
{"title":"Dendritic Voltage Recordings Explain Paradoxical Synaptic Plasticity: A Modeling Study.","authors":"Claire Meissner-Bernard,&nbsp;Matthias Chinyen Tsai,&nbsp;Laureline Logiaco,&nbsp;Wulfram Gerstner","doi":"10.3389/fnsyn.2020.585539","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Experiments have shown that the same stimulation pattern that causes Long-Term Potentiation in proximal synapses, will induce Long-Term Depression in distal ones. In order to understand these, and other, surprising observations we use a phenomenological model of Hebbian plasticity at the location of the synapse. Our model describes the Hebbian condition of joint activity of pre- and postsynaptic neurons in a compact form as the interaction of the glutamate trace left by a presynaptic spike with the time course of the postsynaptic voltage. Instead of simulating the voltage, we test the model using experimentally recorded dendritic voltage traces in hippocampus and neocortex. We find that the time course of the voltage in the neighborhood of a stimulated synapse is a reliable predictor of whether a stimulated synapse undergoes potentiation, depression, or no change. Our computational model can explain the existence of different -at first glance seemingly paradoxical- outcomes of synaptic potentiation and depression experiments depending on the dendritic location of the synapse and the frequency or timing of the stimulation.</p>","PeriodicalId":12650,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Synaptic Neuroscience","volume":"12 ","pages":"585539"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7670913/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Synaptic Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsyn.2020.585539","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Experiments have shown that the same stimulation pattern that causes Long-Term Potentiation in proximal synapses, will induce Long-Term Depression in distal ones. In order to understand these, and other, surprising observations we use a phenomenological model of Hebbian plasticity at the location of the synapse. Our model describes the Hebbian condition of joint activity of pre- and postsynaptic neurons in a compact form as the interaction of the glutamate trace left by a presynaptic spike with the time course of the postsynaptic voltage. Instead of simulating the voltage, we test the model using experimentally recorded dendritic voltage traces in hippocampus and neocortex. We find that the time course of the voltage in the neighborhood of a stimulated synapse is a reliable predictor of whether a stimulated synapse undergoes potentiation, depression, or no change. Our computational model can explain the existence of different -at first glance seemingly paradoxical- outcomes of synaptic potentiation and depression experiments depending on the dendritic location of the synapse and the frequency or timing of the stimulation.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

树突电压记录解释矛盾的突触可塑性:一个模型研究。
实验表明,引起近端突触长时程增强的相同刺激模式,也会引起远端突触长时程抑制。为了理解这些以及其他令人惊讶的观察结果,我们使用了突触位置Hebbian可塑性的现象学模型。我们的模型以紧凑的形式描述了突触前和突触后神经元联合活动的Hebbian条件,作为突触前尖峰留下的谷氨酸痕迹与突触后电压的时间过程的相互作用。我们没有模拟电压,而是使用实验记录的海马和新皮层的树突电压轨迹来测试模型。我们发现,在受刺激的突触附近的电压的时间过程是一个可靠的预测是否受刺激的突触经历增强,抑制,或没有变化。我们的计算模型可以解释突触增强和抑制实验的不同结果——乍一看似乎是矛盾的——取决于突触的树突位置和刺激的频率或时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
2.70%
发文量
74
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信