A Within-Subjects Comparison of Clinical Outcomes for Patients' First and Second Concussions.

Jonathan French, Sabrina Jennings, Shawn R Eagle, Michael W Collins, Anthony P Kontos
{"title":"A Within-Subjects Comparison of Clinical Outcomes for Patients' First and Second Concussions.","authors":"Jonathan French,&nbsp;Sabrina Jennings,&nbsp;Shawn R Eagle,&nbsp;Michael W Collins,&nbsp;Anthony P Kontos","doi":"10.1097/HTR.0000000000000612","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To examine the difference between an individual's first and second concussion using a comprehensive, multidomain assessment including symptoms, neurocognitive, vestibular, ocular, and individual demographic and medical history risk factors associated with protracted recovery.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Concussion Specialty Clinic.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Seventy-three patients (aged 13-21 years; 57% female) diagnosed with 2 separate concussions (380.5 ± 278.7 days between injuries) from August 2016 to August 2018.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective within-subjects cohort study.</p><p><strong>Main measures: </strong>ImPACT, PCSS, and Vestibular-Ocular Motor Screen (VOMS) at each visit. Patients were divided into \"normal\" (≤30 days) and \"protracted\" recovery (>30 days) for χ2 analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no differences between the first and second injuries in recovery time, VOMS, visual and verbal memory, or reaction time. Visual motor speed scores were higher at the second injury time point and reported sleep symptoms were higher at the first injury time point. In addition, participants reported to the clinic on average 3 days earlier for an evaluation for their second injury. Results from χ2 analyses indicated that female sex predicted protracted recovery (>30 days) from concussion at the first injury time point (OR = 4.1; 95% CI, 1.5-11.6; P = .006).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings provide preliminary evidence that there is no clinical difference between patients' first and second concussions when both injuries were treated through a concussion specialty clinic.</p>","PeriodicalId":519229,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"114-119"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HTR.0000000000000612","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objectives: To examine the difference between an individual's first and second concussion using a comprehensive, multidomain assessment including symptoms, neurocognitive, vestibular, ocular, and individual demographic and medical history risk factors associated with protracted recovery.

Setting: Concussion Specialty Clinic.

Participants: Seventy-three patients (aged 13-21 years; 57% female) diagnosed with 2 separate concussions (380.5 ± 278.7 days between injuries) from August 2016 to August 2018.

Design: Retrospective within-subjects cohort study.

Main measures: ImPACT, PCSS, and Vestibular-Ocular Motor Screen (VOMS) at each visit. Patients were divided into "normal" (≤30 days) and "protracted" recovery (>30 days) for χ2 analyses.

Results: There were no differences between the first and second injuries in recovery time, VOMS, visual and verbal memory, or reaction time. Visual motor speed scores were higher at the second injury time point and reported sleep symptoms were higher at the first injury time point. In addition, participants reported to the clinic on average 3 days earlier for an evaluation for their second injury. Results from χ2 analyses indicated that female sex predicted protracted recovery (>30 days) from concussion at the first injury time point (OR = 4.1; 95% CI, 1.5-11.6; P = .006).

Conclusions: The findings provide preliminary evidence that there is no clinical difference between patients' first and second concussions when both injuries were treated through a concussion specialty clinic.

第一次和第二次脑震荡患者临床结果的组内比较。
目的:通过综合、多领域的评估,包括症状、神经认知、前庭、眼部、个人人口统计学和病史等与长期恢复相关的危险因素,研究个体第一次和第二次脑震荡的差异。地点:脑震荡专科诊所。参与者:73例患者(年龄13-21岁;(57%为女性)在2016年8月至2018年8月期间被诊断为两次单独脑震荡(受伤间隔380.5±278.7天)。设计:回顾性受试者队列研究。主要测量指标:每次就诊时ImPACT、PCSS、前庭眼运动筛查(VOMS)。将患者分为“正常”(≤30天)和“延长”(>30天)两组进行χ2分析。结果:第一次和第二次损伤患者在恢复时间、VOMS、视觉和言语记忆、反应时间等方面无显著差异。视觉运动速度得分在第二个损伤时间点较高,报告的睡眠症状在第一个损伤时间点较高。此外,参与者平均提前3天到诊所进行第二次损伤评估。χ2分析结果表明,女性在第一次损伤时间点的脑震荡恢复时间较长(>30天)(OR = 4.1;95% ci, 1.5-11.6;P = .006)。结论:研究结果提供了初步证据,表明在脑震荡专科诊所治疗两种损伤的患者的第一次和第二次脑震荡没有临床差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书