COVID-19: The impact of social distancing policies, cross-country analysis.

Gonzalo Castex, Evgenia Dechter, Miguel Lorca
{"title":"COVID-19: The impact of social distancing policies, cross-country analysis.","authors":"Gonzalo Castex, Evgenia Dechter, Miguel Lorca","doi":"10.1007/s41885-020-00076-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>At the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic a large number of countries introduced a range of non-pharmaceutical interventions. Whereas the policies are similar across countries, country characteristics vary substantially. We examine the effectiveness of such policies using a cross-country variation in socio-economic, environmental and geographic, and health system dimensions. The effectiveness of policies that prescribe closures of schools and workplaces is declining with population density, country surface area, employment rate and proportion of elderly in the population; and increasing with GDP per capita and health expenditure. Cross-country human mobility data reinforce some of these results. We argue that the findings can be explained by behavioural response to risk perceptions and resource constraints. Voluntary practice of social distancing might be less prevalent in communities with lower perceived risk, associated with better access to health care and smaller proportion of elderly population. Higher population density, larger geographical area, and higher employment rate may require more resources to ensure compliance with lockdown policies.</p>","PeriodicalId":72868,"journal":{"name":"Economics of disasters and climate change","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7557240/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economics of disasters and climate change","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41885-020-00076-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/10/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

At the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic a large number of countries introduced a range of non-pharmaceutical interventions. Whereas the policies are similar across countries, country characteristics vary substantially. We examine the effectiveness of such policies using a cross-country variation in socio-economic, environmental and geographic, and health system dimensions. The effectiveness of policies that prescribe closures of schools and workplaces is declining with population density, country surface area, employment rate and proportion of elderly in the population; and increasing with GDP per capita and health expenditure. Cross-country human mobility data reinforce some of these results. We argue that the findings can be explained by behavioural response to risk perceptions and resource constraints. Voluntary practice of social distancing might be less prevalent in communities with lower perceived risk, associated with better access to health care and smaller proportion of elderly population. Higher population density, larger geographical area, and higher employment rate may require more resources to ensure compliance with lockdown policies.

COVID-19:社会疏远政策的影响,跨国分析。
在 COVID-19 大流行之初,许多国家都采取了一系列非药物干预措施。虽然各国的政策相似,但国家特征却大相径庭。我们利用社会经济、环境和地理以及卫生系统等方面的跨国差异来研究这些政策的有效性。规定关闭学校和工作场所的政策的有效性随人口密度、国土面积、就业率和老年人口比例的增加而降低,随人均国内生产总值和医疗支出的增加而提高。跨国人口流动数据强化了其中一些结果。我们认为,这些结果可以用对风险认知和资源限制的行为反应来解释。在风险感知较低的社区,自愿拉开社会距离的做法可能不那么普遍,这与更好地获得医疗保健服务和老年人口比例较低有关。人口密度较高、地理面积较大和就业率较高的社区可能需要更多的资源来确保遵守封锁政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信