Tomography-based definition of keratoconus for Down syndrome patients.

Eye and vision (London, England) Pub Date : 2020-10-05 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1186/s40662-020-00215-1
Soheila Asgari, Shiva Mehravaran, Mohammadreza Aghamirsalim, Hassan Hashemi
{"title":"Tomography-based definition of keratoconus for Down syndrome patients.","authors":"Soheila Asgari,&nbsp;Shiva Mehravaran,&nbsp;Mohammadreza Aghamirsalim,&nbsp;Hassan Hashemi","doi":"10.1186/s40662-020-00215-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To assess the diagnostic ability of Pentacam HR (Oculus Optikgeräte, GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany) tomographic indices in discriminating keratoconus (KC) and KC suspect (KCS) in 10- to 30-year-old patients with Down syndrome (DS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this study, DS patients were enrolled through special needs schools, the National Down Syndrome Society, and relevant non-profit organizations. Diagnoses were made independently by two experienced specialists. Forty Pentacam indices related to corneal thickness, volume, density, keratometry, power, shape, aberration, and elevation were extracted. For each index, the accuracy for KC and KCS diagnosis was evaluated using discriminant analysis and the area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). From each enrolled case, data from only one eye was entered in the analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analyses were performed on data from 25 KC, 46 KCS, and 154 non-ectatic DS eyes. The best discriminants for KC were anterior higher order aberrations (HOA) (cutoff > 0.643, AUROC = 0.879), posterior vertical coma (cutoff > 0.0702 μm, AUROC = 0.875), anterior vertical coma (cutoff > 0.4124 μm, AUROC = 0.868), and total HOA (cutoff > 0.608, AUROC = 0.867). The difference between AUROCs were not statistically significant (all <i>P</i> > 0.05). For KCS, the best discriminants were minimum corneal thickness (cutoff ≤ 480.0 μm, AUROC = 0.775), corneal volume (cutoff ≤ 55.3 μm, AUROC = 0.727) and Belin Ambrosio display-total deviation (BAD-D) (cutoff > 2.23, AUROC = 0.718) with no significant difference between AUROCs (all <i>P</i> > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this sample of DS patients, best KC discriminators were HOA and coma which showed good diagnostic ability. For KCS, best predictors were minimum corneal thickness, corneal volume, and BAD-D with relatively good diagnostic ability. Defining a new set of KC diagnostic criteria for DS patients is suggested.</p>","PeriodicalId":520624,"journal":{"name":"Eye and vision (London, England)","volume":" ","pages":"49"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s40662-020-00215-1","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eye and vision (London, England)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40662-020-00215-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Background: To assess the diagnostic ability of Pentacam HR (Oculus Optikgeräte, GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany) tomographic indices in discriminating keratoconus (KC) and KC suspect (KCS) in 10- to 30-year-old patients with Down syndrome (DS).

Methods: In this study, DS patients were enrolled through special needs schools, the National Down Syndrome Society, and relevant non-profit organizations. Diagnoses were made independently by two experienced specialists. Forty Pentacam indices related to corneal thickness, volume, density, keratometry, power, shape, aberration, and elevation were extracted. For each index, the accuracy for KC and KCS diagnosis was evaluated using discriminant analysis and the area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). From each enrolled case, data from only one eye was entered in the analyses.

Results: Analyses were performed on data from 25 KC, 46 KCS, and 154 non-ectatic DS eyes. The best discriminants for KC were anterior higher order aberrations (HOA) (cutoff > 0.643, AUROC = 0.879), posterior vertical coma (cutoff > 0.0702 μm, AUROC = 0.875), anterior vertical coma (cutoff > 0.4124 μm, AUROC = 0.868), and total HOA (cutoff > 0.608, AUROC = 0.867). The difference between AUROCs were not statistically significant (all P > 0.05). For KCS, the best discriminants were minimum corneal thickness (cutoff ≤ 480.0 μm, AUROC = 0.775), corneal volume (cutoff ≤ 55.3 μm, AUROC = 0.727) and Belin Ambrosio display-total deviation (BAD-D) (cutoff > 2.23, AUROC = 0.718) with no significant difference between AUROCs (all P > 0.05).

Conclusions: In this sample of DS patients, best KC discriminators were HOA and coma which showed good diagnostic ability. For KCS, best predictors were minimum corneal thickness, corneal volume, and BAD-D with relatively good diagnostic ability. Defining a new set of KC diagnostic criteria for DS patients is suggested.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

唐氏综合征患者圆锥角膜的体层摄影定义。
背景:评价Pentacam HR (Oculus Optikgeräte, GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany)断层扫描指标对10 ~ 30岁唐氏综合征(DS)患者圆锥角膜(KC)和疑似KC (KCS)的诊断能力。方法:本研究通过特殊需要学校、全国唐氏综合症协会和相关非营利组织招募唐氏症患者。诊断由两位经验丰富的专家独立做出。提取了与角膜厚度、体积、密度、角膜比例尺、度数、形状、像差和高度相关的40个Pentacam指数。对于各指标,采用判别分析和受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUROC)评价KC和KCS诊断的准确性。在每个入组病例中,只将一只眼睛的数据输入分析。结果:对25只KC眼、46只KCS眼和154只非膨出性DS眼的数据进行了分析。KC的最佳判别指标为前高阶像差(HOA) (cut - off > 0.643, AUROC = 0.879)、后垂直昏迷(cut - off > 0.0702 μm, AUROC = 0.875)、前垂直昏迷(cut - off > 0.4124 μm, AUROC = 0.868)和总HOA (cut - off > 0.608, AUROC = 0.867)。auroc间差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。对于KCS,最佳判别指标为角膜最小厚度(cut - off≤480.0 μm, AUROC = 0.775)、角膜体积(cut - off≤55.3 μm, AUROC = 0.727)和Belin Ambrosio显示-总偏差(BAD-D) (cut - off > 2.23, AUROC = 0.718),各指标间差异无统计学意义(均P > 0.05)。结论:在本组DS患者中,最佳的KC鉴别指标为HOA和昏迷,具有较好的诊断能力。对于KCS,最佳的预测因子是最小角膜厚度、角膜体积和BAD-D,诊断能力相对较好。建议为退行性椎体滑移患者制定一套新的KC诊断标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信