Feasibility of Anesthesiologist-Performed Preoperative Echocardiography for the Prediction of Postinduction Hypotension: A Prospective Observational Study.

IF 1.6 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Anesthesiology Research and Practice Pub Date : 2020-10-20 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2020/1375741
Babar Fiza, Neal Duggal, Caitlin E McMillan, Graciela Mentz, Michael D Maile
{"title":"Feasibility of Anesthesiologist-Performed Preoperative Echocardiography for the Prediction of Postinduction Hypotension: A Prospective Observational Study.","authors":"Babar Fiza,&nbsp;Neal Duggal,&nbsp;Caitlin E McMillan,&nbsp;Graciela Mentz,&nbsp;Michael D Maile","doi":"10.1155/2020/1375741","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To determine if left ventricular or inferior vena cava (IVC) measurements are easier to obtain on point-of-care ultrasound by anesthesiologists in preoperative patients, and to assess the relationship between preoperative cardiac dimensions and hypotension with the induction of general anesthesia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective observational study was conducted at a large academic medical center. Sixty-three patients undergoing noncardiac surgeries under general anesthesia were enrolled. Ultrasound examinations were performed by anesthesiologists in the preoperative area. To ensure that hypotension represented both a relative and absolute decrease in blood pressure, both a mean arterial pressure (MAP) < 65 mmHg and a MAP decrease of >30% from preoperative value defined this outcome.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Left ventricular measurements were more likely to be acquired than IVC measurements (97% vs. 79%). Subjects without adequate images to assess IVC collapsibility tended to have a higher body mass index (33.6 ± 5.5 vs. 28.5 ± 4.5, <i>p</i>=0.001). While high left ventricular end-diastolic diameter values were associated with a decreased odds of MAP < 65 mmHg (OR: 0.24, 95% CI: 0.07-0.83, <i>p</i>=0.023) or a MAP decrease of >30% from baseline alone (OR: 0.25, 95% CI: 0.07-0.83, <i>p</i>=0.023), the primary endpoint of both relative and absolute hypotension was not associated with preoperative left ventricular dimensions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Preoperative cardiac ultrasound may be a more reliable way for anesthesiologists to assess patients' volume status compared to ultrasound of the IVC, particularly for patients with a higher body mass index.</p>","PeriodicalId":7834,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesiology Research and Practice","volume":"2020 ","pages":"1375741"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2020/1375741","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesiology Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/1375741","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Purpose: To determine if left ventricular or inferior vena cava (IVC) measurements are easier to obtain on point-of-care ultrasound by anesthesiologists in preoperative patients, and to assess the relationship between preoperative cardiac dimensions and hypotension with the induction of general anesthesia.

Methods: This prospective observational study was conducted at a large academic medical center. Sixty-three patients undergoing noncardiac surgeries under general anesthesia were enrolled. Ultrasound examinations were performed by anesthesiologists in the preoperative area. To ensure that hypotension represented both a relative and absolute decrease in blood pressure, both a mean arterial pressure (MAP) < 65 mmHg and a MAP decrease of >30% from preoperative value defined this outcome.

Results: Left ventricular measurements were more likely to be acquired than IVC measurements (97% vs. 79%). Subjects without adequate images to assess IVC collapsibility tended to have a higher body mass index (33.6 ± 5.5 vs. 28.5 ± 4.5, p=0.001). While high left ventricular end-diastolic diameter values were associated with a decreased odds of MAP < 65 mmHg (OR: 0.24, 95% CI: 0.07-0.83, p=0.023) or a MAP decrease of >30% from baseline alone (OR: 0.25, 95% CI: 0.07-0.83, p=0.023), the primary endpoint of both relative and absolute hypotension was not associated with preoperative left ventricular dimensions.

Conclusions: Preoperative cardiac ultrasound may be a more reliable way for anesthesiologists to assess patients' volume status compared to ultrasound of the IVC, particularly for patients with a higher body mass index.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

麻醉医师术前超声心动图预测诱导后低血压的可行性:一项前瞻性观察研究。
目的:探讨麻醉医师对术前患者的左心室或下腔静脉(IVC)测量是否更容易获得,并评估术前心脏尺寸和低血压与全麻诱导的关系。方法:本前瞻性观察研究在一家大型学术医疗中心进行。63例在全身麻醉下接受非心脏手术的患者被纳入研究。术前由麻醉师进行超声检查。为了确保低血压代表血压的相对和绝对下降,平均动脉压(MAP)较术前值的30%定义了这一结果。结果:左心室测量比下腔静脉测量更容易获得(97%对79%)。没有足够图像来评估下腔静脉可折叠性的受试者往往有更高的体重指数(33.6±5.5比28.5±4.5,p=0.001)。虽然高左心室舒张末期内径值与MAP降低的几率(p=0.023)或与基线相比MAP降低>30%相关(or: 0.25, 95% CI: 0.07-0.83, p=0.023),但相对和绝对低血压的主要终点与术前左心室尺寸无关。结论:术前心脏超声可能是麻醉医师评估患者下腔超声容量状态的更可靠的方法,特别是对于体重指数较高的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信