The State of Affairs in Post-Exposure Leprosy Prevention: A Descriptive Meta-Analysis on Immuno- and Chemo-Prophylaxis.

IF 3.1 Q2 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Research and Reports in Tropical Medicine Pub Date : 2020-10-15 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.2147/RRTM.S190300
Anne Schoenmakers, Liesbeth Mieras, Teky Budiawan, Wim H van Brakel
{"title":"The State of Affairs in Post-Exposure Leprosy Prevention: A Descriptive Meta-Analysis on Immuno- and Chemo-Prophylaxis.","authors":"Anne Schoenmakers, Liesbeth Mieras, Teky Budiawan, Wim H van Brakel","doi":"10.2147/RRTM.S190300","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Annually, over 200,000 people are diagnosed with leprosy, also called Hansen's disease. This number has been relatively stable over the past years. Progress has been made in the fields of chemoprophylaxis and immunoprophylaxis to prevent leprosy, with a primary focus on close contacts of patients. In this descriptive meta-analysis, we summarize the evidence and identify knowledge gaps regarding post-exposure prophylaxis against leprosy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature search according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) methodology was conducted by searching the medical scientific databases Cochrane, Embase, Pubmed/MEDLINE, Research Gate, Scopus and Web of Science on Jan. 22, 2020, using a combination of synonyms for index terms in four languages: \"leprosy\" and \"population\" or \"contacts\" and \"prevention\" or \"prophylaxis.\" Subsequently, Infolep.org and Google Scholar were searched and the \"snowball method\" was used to retrieve other potentially relevant literature. The found articles were screened for eligibility using predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After deduplication, 1,515 articles were screened, and 125 articles were included in this descriptive meta-analysis. Immunoprophylaxis by bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) vaccination is known to provide protection against leprosy. The protection it offers is higher in household contacts of leprosy patients compared with the general population and is seen to decline over time. Contact follow-up screening is important in the first period after BCG administration, as a substantial number of new leprosy patients presents three months post-vaccination. Evidence for the benefit of re-vaccination is conflicting. The World Health Organization (WHO) included BCG in its Guidelines for the Diagnosis, Treatment and Prevention of Leprosy by stating that BCG at birth should be maintained in at least all leprosy high-burden regions. Literature shows that several vaccination interventions with other immunoprophylactic agents demonstrate similar or slightly less efficacy in leprosy risk reduction compared with BCG. However, most of these studies do not exclusively focus on post-exposure prophylaxis. Two vaccines are considered future candidates for leprosy prophylaxis: <i>Mycobacterium indicus pranii</i> (<i>MiP</i>) and LepVax. For chemoprophylaxis, trials were performed with dapsone/acedapsone, rifampicin, and ROM, a combination of rifampicin, ofloxacin, and minocycline. Single-dose rifampicin is favored as post-exposure prophylaxis, abbreviated as SDR-PEP. It demonstrated a protective effect of 57% in the first two years after administration to contacts of leprosy patients. It is inexpensive, and adverse events are rare. The risk of SDR-PEP inducing rifampicin resistance is considered negligible, but continuous monitoring in accordance with WHO policies should be encouraged. The integration of contact screening and SDR-PEP administration into different leprosy control programs was found to be feasible and well accepted. Since 2018, SDR-PEP is included in the WHO Guidelines for the Diagnosis, Treatment and Prevention of Leprosy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Progress has been made in the areas of chemoprophylaxis and immunoprophylaxis to prevent leprosy in contacts of patients. Investing in vaccine studies, like LepVax and <i>MiP,</i> and increasing harmonization between tuberculosis (TB) and leprosy research groups is important. SDR-PEP is promising as a chemoprophylactic agent, and further implementation should be promoted. More chemoprophylaxis research is needed on: enhanced medication regimens; interventions in varying (epidemiological) settings, including focal mass drug administration (fMDA); specific approaches per contact type; combinations with screening variations and field-friendly rapid tests, if available in the future; community and health staff education; ongoing antibiotic resistance surveillance; and administering chemoprophylaxis with SDR-PEP prior to BCG administration. Additionally, both leprosy prophylactic drug registration nationally and prophylactic drug availability globally at low or no cost are important for the implementation and further upscaling of preventive measures against leprosy, such as SDR-PEP and new vaccines.</p>","PeriodicalId":21138,"journal":{"name":"Research and Reports in Tropical Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/a6/02/rrtm-11-97.PMC7573302.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research and Reports in Tropical Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/RRTM.S190300","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Annually, over 200,000 people are diagnosed with leprosy, also called Hansen's disease. This number has been relatively stable over the past years. Progress has been made in the fields of chemoprophylaxis and immunoprophylaxis to prevent leprosy, with a primary focus on close contacts of patients. In this descriptive meta-analysis, we summarize the evidence and identify knowledge gaps regarding post-exposure prophylaxis against leprosy.

Methods: A systematic literature search according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) methodology was conducted by searching the medical scientific databases Cochrane, Embase, Pubmed/MEDLINE, Research Gate, Scopus and Web of Science on Jan. 22, 2020, using a combination of synonyms for index terms in four languages: "leprosy" and "population" or "contacts" and "prevention" or "prophylaxis." Subsequently, Infolep.org and Google Scholar were searched and the "snowball method" was used to retrieve other potentially relevant literature. The found articles were screened for eligibility using predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria.

Results: After deduplication, 1,515 articles were screened, and 125 articles were included in this descriptive meta-analysis. Immunoprophylaxis by bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) vaccination is known to provide protection against leprosy. The protection it offers is higher in household contacts of leprosy patients compared with the general population and is seen to decline over time. Contact follow-up screening is important in the first period after BCG administration, as a substantial number of new leprosy patients presents three months post-vaccination. Evidence for the benefit of re-vaccination is conflicting. The World Health Organization (WHO) included BCG in its Guidelines for the Diagnosis, Treatment and Prevention of Leprosy by stating that BCG at birth should be maintained in at least all leprosy high-burden regions. Literature shows that several vaccination interventions with other immunoprophylactic agents demonstrate similar or slightly less efficacy in leprosy risk reduction compared with BCG. However, most of these studies do not exclusively focus on post-exposure prophylaxis. Two vaccines are considered future candidates for leprosy prophylaxis: Mycobacterium indicus pranii (MiP) and LepVax. For chemoprophylaxis, trials were performed with dapsone/acedapsone, rifampicin, and ROM, a combination of rifampicin, ofloxacin, and minocycline. Single-dose rifampicin is favored as post-exposure prophylaxis, abbreviated as SDR-PEP. It demonstrated a protective effect of 57% in the first two years after administration to contacts of leprosy patients. It is inexpensive, and adverse events are rare. The risk of SDR-PEP inducing rifampicin resistance is considered negligible, but continuous monitoring in accordance with WHO policies should be encouraged. The integration of contact screening and SDR-PEP administration into different leprosy control programs was found to be feasible and well accepted. Since 2018, SDR-PEP is included in the WHO Guidelines for the Diagnosis, Treatment and Prevention of Leprosy.

Conclusion: Progress has been made in the areas of chemoprophylaxis and immunoprophylaxis to prevent leprosy in contacts of patients. Investing in vaccine studies, like LepVax and MiP, and increasing harmonization between tuberculosis (TB) and leprosy research groups is important. SDR-PEP is promising as a chemoprophylactic agent, and further implementation should be promoted. More chemoprophylaxis research is needed on: enhanced medication regimens; interventions in varying (epidemiological) settings, including focal mass drug administration (fMDA); specific approaches per contact type; combinations with screening variations and field-friendly rapid tests, if available in the future; community and health staff education; ongoing antibiotic resistance surveillance; and administering chemoprophylaxis with SDR-PEP prior to BCG administration. Additionally, both leprosy prophylactic drug registration nationally and prophylactic drug availability globally at low or no cost are important for the implementation and further upscaling of preventive measures against leprosy, such as SDR-PEP and new vaccines.

Abstract Image

暴露后麻风病预防的现状:关于免疫和化学预防的描述性元分析。
目标:每年有 20 多万人被诊断出患有麻风病(又称汉森氏病)。这一数字在过去几年中相对稳定。在预防麻风病的化学预防和免疫预防领域取得了进展,其主要重点是麻风病人的密切接触者。在这项描述性荟萃分析中,我们总结了有关麻风病暴露后预防的证据,并找出了相关知识的不足之处:2020年1月22日,根据系统综述和荟萃分析首选报告项目(PRISMA)方法,使用四种语言的同义词组合检索了医学科学数据库Cochrane、Embase、Pubmed/MEDLINE、Research Gate、Scopus和Web of Science,进行了系统文献检索:"麻风病 "和 "人群 "或 "接触者 "以及 "预防 "或 "预防性治疗"。随后,还搜索了 Infolep.org 和谷歌学术,并采用 "滚雪球法 "检索其他可能相关的文献。根据预先确定的纳入和排除标准对找到的文章进行资格筛选:结果:经过重复筛选,共筛选出 1,515 篇文章,其中 125 篇文章被纳入此次描述性荟萃分析。众所周知,接种卡介苗可预防麻风病。与普通人群相比,麻风病人的家庭接触者接种卡介苗的保护率更高,而且随着时间的推移,保护率会逐渐下降。在接种卡介苗后的第一阶段,接触者随访筛查非常重要,因为大量新麻风病人会在接种后三个月发病。有关再次接种麻风疫苗的益处的证据并不一致。世界卫生组织(WHO)将卡介苗纳入《麻风病诊断、治疗和预防指南》,指出至少在所有麻风病高负担地区都应坚持在出生时接种卡介苗。文献显示,与卡介苗相比,使用其他免疫预防制剂的几种疫苗接种干预措施在降低麻风病风险方面的效果相似或略逊一筹。不过,这些研究大多并不只关注暴露后预防。有两种疫苗被认为是未来麻风病预防的候选疫苗:麻风分枝杆菌(MiP)和麻风疫苗(LepVax)。在化学预防方面,使用了达泊松/阿达帕松、利福平和 ROM(利福平、氧氟沙星和米诺环素的复方制剂)进行了试验。单剂量利福平作为暴露后预防药物(简称 SDR-PEP)受到青睐。在对麻风病人的接触者用药后的头两年中,其保护效果达到 57%。它价格低廉,不良反应也很少发生。SDR-PEP诱发利福平耐药性的风险可忽略不计,但应鼓励根据世界卫生组织的政策进行持续监测。研究发现,将接触筛查和SDR-PEP管理纳入不同的麻风病控制项目是可行的,并且广为接受。自2018年起,SDR-PEP被纳入《世界卫生组织麻风病诊断、治疗和预防指南》:在预防麻风病人接触者的化学预防和免疫预防领域已取得进展。投资疫苗研究(如 LepVax 和 MiP)以及加强结核病研究小组与麻风病研究小组之间的协调非常重要。SDR-PEP作为一种化学预防药物很有前景,应进一步推广使用。需要在以下方面开展更多的化学预防研究:强化用药方案;在不同(流行病学)环境中采取干预措施,包括集中大规模给药(fMDA);针对不同接触类型采取特定方法;与筛查变异方法和便于现场使用的快速检测相结合(如果将来有的话);社区和医务人员教育;持续进行抗生素耐药性监测;以及在卡介苗注射前使用 SDR-PEP 进行化学预防。此外,在全国范围内进行麻风病预防药物注册,以及在全球范围内以低价或免费提供预防药物,对于麻风病预防措施(如 SDR-PEP 和新型疫苗)的实施和进一步推广非常重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Research and Reports in Tropical Medicine
Research and Reports in Tropical Medicine MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信