Effect of 12 Weeks of Resistance Training on Motor Coordination and Dynamic Balance of Older Woman.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Rejuvenation research Pub Date : 2021-06-01 Epub Date: 2020-12-11 DOI:10.1089/rej.2020.2339
Luis Henrique Boiko Ferreira, Brad J Schoenfeld, André C Smolarek, Steven R McAnulty, Luis Paulo G Mascarenhas, Tácito P Souza Junior
{"title":"Effect of 12 Weeks of Resistance Training on Motor Coordination and Dynamic Balance of Older Woman.","authors":"Luis Henrique Boiko Ferreira,&nbsp;Brad J Schoenfeld,&nbsp;André C Smolarek,&nbsp;Steven R McAnulty,&nbsp;Luis Paulo G Mascarenhas,&nbsp;Tácito P Souza Junior","doi":"10.1089/rej.2020.2339","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Resistance training (RT) is considered a viable strategy to enhance the autonomy and functionality of older populations. We randomized 49 older women (64.2 ± 3.8) into one of two groups: an intervention group (IG) (<i>n</i> = 29) that performed regimented RT or a nontraining control group (CG) (<i>n</i> = 20). The RT protocol was carried out three times a week for both the upper and lower limbs over a 12-week study period. A 30-second arm flexion test was used to test upper limb endurance and a 30-second chair stand test was used to analyze lower limb endurance. Dynamic balance was tested by a Y balance test normalized by leg length. A Soda Pop test was employed to analyze coordination. Results showed significant improvements in IG versus CG in both upper limb (19.50 ± 1.52 vs. 11.40 ± 2.87, <i>p</i> = 0.001) and lower limb muscular endurance (14.90 ± 3.10 vs. 26.56 ± 3.17, <i>p</i> = 0.001). Moreover, the training group showed superior improvements in anterior and posterolateral balance compared to CG (63.9% ± 3.1% to 70.2 ± 2.1 and 88.1 ± 3.9 to 94.2 ± 2.7 with <i>p</i> = 0.001, respectively). There were no significant differences in coordination outcomes between groups. In conclusion, we demonstrate that RT is effective in developing muscular endurance and dynamic balance in postmenopausal women, but does not influence muscular coordination in the measures studied. Study registered in the Brazilian Registry Clinical Trials Registry (No. RBR-7MZ2KR).</p>","PeriodicalId":20979,"journal":{"name":"Rejuvenation research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1089/rej.2020.2339","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rejuvenation research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/rej.2020.2339","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/12/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Resistance training (RT) is considered a viable strategy to enhance the autonomy and functionality of older populations. We randomized 49 older women (64.2 ± 3.8) into one of two groups: an intervention group (IG) (n = 29) that performed regimented RT or a nontraining control group (CG) (n = 20). The RT protocol was carried out three times a week for both the upper and lower limbs over a 12-week study period. A 30-second arm flexion test was used to test upper limb endurance and a 30-second chair stand test was used to analyze lower limb endurance. Dynamic balance was tested by a Y balance test normalized by leg length. A Soda Pop test was employed to analyze coordination. Results showed significant improvements in IG versus CG in both upper limb (19.50 ± 1.52 vs. 11.40 ± 2.87, p = 0.001) and lower limb muscular endurance (14.90 ± 3.10 vs. 26.56 ± 3.17, p = 0.001). Moreover, the training group showed superior improvements in anterior and posterolateral balance compared to CG (63.9% ± 3.1% to 70.2 ± 2.1 and 88.1 ± 3.9 to 94.2 ± 2.7 with p = 0.001, respectively). There were no significant differences in coordination outcomes between groups. In conclusion, we demonstrate that RT is effective in developing muscular endurance and dynamic balance in postmenopausal women, but does not influence muscular coordination in the measures studied. Study registered in the Brazilian Registry Clinical Trials Registry (No. RBR-7MZ2KR).

12周阻力训练对老年妇女运动协调和动态平衡的影响。
阻力训练(RT)被认为是提高老年人自主性和功能的可行策略。我们将49名老年妇女(64.2±3.8)随机分为两组:干预组(IG) (n = 29)和非训练对照组(CG) (n = 20)。在为期12周的研究期间,每周对上肢和下肢进行三次RT方案。采用30秒手臂屈曲试验测试上肢耐力,采用30秒椅子站立试验分析下肢耐力。动态平衡测试采用按腿长标准化的Y平衡测试。采用Soda Pop测试分析协调性。结果显示,上肢IG比CG(19.50±1.52比11.40±2.87,p = 0.001)和下肢肌肉耐力(14.90±3.10比26.56±3.17,p = 0.001)均有显著改善。此外,与对照组相比,训练组在前外侧和后外侧平衡方面的改善更明显(分别为63.9%±3.1%至70.2±2.1和88.1±3.9至94.2±2.7,p = 0.001)。两组间协调结果无显著差异。总之,我们证明,在研究的措施中,RT有效地发展绝经后妇女的肌肉耐力和动态平衡,但不影响肌肉协调。在巴西临床试验注册中心注册的研究。RBR-7MZ2KR)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Rejuvenation research
Rejuvenation research 医学-老年医学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Rejuvenation Research publishes cutting-edge, peer-reviewed research on rejuvenation therapies in the laboratory and the clinic. The Journal focuses on key explorations and advances that may ultimately contribute to slowing or reversing the aging process, and covers topics such as cardiovascular aging, DNA damage and repair, cloning, and cell immortalization and senescence. Rejuvenation Research coverage includes: Cell immortalization and senescence Pluripotent stem cells DNA damage/repair Gene targeting, gene therapy, and genomics Growth factors and nutrient supply/sensing Immunosenescence Comparative biology of aging Tissue engineering Late-life pathologies (cardiovascular, neurodegenerative and others) Public policy and social context.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信