Queer ethics and fostering positive mindsets toward non-binary gender, genderqueer, and gender ambiguity.

Q1 Social Sciences
International Journal of Transgenderism Pub Date : 2018-10-08 eCollection Date: 2019-01-01 DOI:10.1080/15532739.2018.1505576
Lucy Nicholas
{"title":"Queer ethics and fostering positive mindsets toward non-binary gender, genderqueer, and gender ambiguity.","authors":"Lucy Nicholas","doi":"10.1080/15532739.2018.1505576","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Alongside the growth in visibility of gender identities and presentations such as genderqueer, non-binary and gender neutral, there is ridicule and backlash in wider culture, as well as more subtle invisibility and misgendering. While there exists social psychology research about negative and positive attitudes to trans people, this is restricted to those whose gender identity is at odds with their sex assigned at birth, and who identify with binary gender. Social psychology has extended to the more subtle workings of transphobia, but there is little consideration of the distinctiveness of attitudes and responses to those whose genders cannot be attributed in binary ways, and thus how these may be challenged. <b>Methods:</b> In keeping with the methods of social theory, this article brings together a diverse and complementary range of conceptual fields in new ways to diagnose a novel cause and solution to these negative attitudes. Using queer theory, feminist ethics, and empirical studies in post-tolerance sociology and social psychology, it argues that negative social responses to genderqueerness stem not only from overt prejudice in the form of transphobia but from binary genderism, the conviction that there are only two genders. <b>Results and conclusion:</b> This article proposes fostering greater diversity-literacy and empathy for difference as a more effective approach than minority identity-based 'prejudice reduction' approaches. A norm-critical approach to deconstructing gender norms is proposed, thus fostering positive attitudes to genderqueerness. It is therefore demonstrated how best to foster enabling social contexts for genderqueerness, with positive implications for the physical and social health and wellbeing of gender variant people. This approach can be applied in organizations, institutions, and by service providers who interact with genderqueer individuals, in that it can inform a shift to approaching diversity positively in ways that are not restricted to pre-determined and binary identity categories.</p>","PeriodicalId":56012,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Transgenderism","volume":" ","pages":"169-180"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/15532739.2018.1505576","citationCount":"41","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Transgenderism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15532739.2018.1505576","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 41

Abstract

Background: Alongside the growth in visibility of gender identities and presentations such as genderqueer, non-binary and gender neutral, there is ridicule and backlash in wider culture, as well as more subtle invisibility and misgendering. While there exists social psychology research about negative and positive attitudes to trans people, this is restricted to those whose gender identity is at odds with their sex assigned at birth, and who identify with binary gender. Social psychology has extended to the more subtle workings of transphobia, but there is little consideration of the distinctiveness of attitudes and responses to those whose genders cannot be attributed in binary ways, and thus how these may be challenged. Methods: In keeping with the methods of social theory, this article brings together a diverse and complementary range of conceptual fields in new ways to diagnose a novel cause and solution to these negative attitudes. Using queer theory, feminist ethics, and empirical studies in post-tolerance sociology and social psychology, it argues that negative social responses to genderqueerness stem not only from overt prejudice in the form of transphobia but from binary genderism, the conviction that there are only two genders. Results and conclusion: This article proposes fostering greater diversity-literacy and empathy for difference as a more effective approach than minority identity-based 'prejudice reduction' approaches. A norm-critical approach to deconstructing gender norms is proposed, thus fostering positive attitudes to genderqueerness. It is therefore demonstrated how best to foster enabling social contexts for genderqueerness, with positive implications for the physical and social health and wellbeing of gender variant people. This approach can be applied in organizations, institutions, and by service providers who interact with genderqueer individuals, in that it can inform a shift to approaching diversity positively in ways that are not restricted to pre-determined and binary identity categories.

酷儿伦理和培养对非二元性别、性别酷儿和性别模糊的积极心态。
背景:随着性别认同和性别表现(如性别酷儿、非二元和性别中立)的可见度不断提高,在更广泛的文化中也存在着嘲笑和反对,以及更微妙的隐形和性别误解。虽然存在关于对跨性别者的消极和积极态度的社会心理学研究,但这仅限于那些性别认同与出生时的性别分配不一致的人,以及那些认同二元性别的人。社会心理学已经扩展到更微妙的跨性别恐惧症,但很少考虑到对那些不能以二元方式归因于性别的人的态度和反应的独特性,以及这些态度和反应如何受到挑战。方法:与社会理论的方法保持一致,本文以新的方式汇集了多种互补的概念领域,以诊断这些消极态度的新原因和解决方案。运用酷儿理论、女权主义伦理学以及后宽容社会学和社会心理学的实证研究,作者认为,社会对性别酷儿的负面反应不仅源于对变性人的公开偏见,还源于二元性别主义,即认为只有两种性别。结果和结论:本文建议培养更多的多样性素养和对差异的同情,这是比基于少数民族身份的“减少偏见”方法更有效的方法。提出了一种解构性别规范的规范批判方法,从而培养对性别酷儿的积极态度。因此,它展示了如何最好地促进对性别酷儿有利的社会环境,对性别变异者的身体和社会健康和福祉产生积极影响。这种方法可以应用于与性别酷儿个体互动的组织、机构和服务提供者,因为它可以告知以不局限于预先确定的和二元身份类别的方式积极地接近多样性的转变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Transgenderism
International Journal of Transgenderism Social Sciences-Gender Studies
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: International Journal of Transgenderism, together with its partner organization the World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH), offers an international, multidisciplinary scholarly forum for publication in the field of transgender health in its broadest sense for academics, practitioners, policy makers, and the general population. The journal welcomes contributions from a range of disciplines, such as: Endocrinology Surgery Obstetrics and Gynaecology Psychiatry Psychology Speech and language therapy Sexual medicine Sexology Family therapy Public health Sociology Counselling Law Medical ethics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信