Machine Learning Approach to Predict Risk of 90-Day Hospital Readmissions in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: Implications for Quality Improvement in Healthcare.

IF 1.5 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Health Services Research and Managerial Epidemiology Pub Date : 2020-09-29 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1177/2333392820961887
Man Hung, Eric S Hon, Evelyn Lauren, Julie Xu, Gary Judd, Weicong Su
{"title":"Machine Learning Approach to Predict Risk of 90-Day Hospital Readmissions in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: Implications for Quality Improvement in Healthcare.","authors":"Man Hung,&nbsp;Eric S Hon,&nbsp;Evelyn Lauren,&nbsp;Julie Xu,&nbsp;Gary Judd,&nbsp;Weicong Su","doi":"10.1177/2333392820961887","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Atrial fibrillation (AF) in the elderly population is projected to increase over the next several decades. Catheter ablation shows promise as a treatment option and is becoming increasingly available. We examined 90-day hospital readmission for AF patients undergoing catheter ablation and utilized machine learning methods to explore the risk factors associated with these readmission trends.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from the 2013 Nationwide Readmissions Database on AF cases were used to predict 90-day readmissions for AF with catheter ablation. Multiple machine learning methods such as k-Nearest Neighbors, Decision Tree, and Support Vector Machine were employed to determine variable importance and build risk prediction models. Accuracy, precision, sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve were compared for each model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 90-day hospital readmission rate was 17.6%; the average age of the patients was 64.9 years; 62.9% of patients were male. Important variables in predicting 90-day hospital readmissions in patients with AF undergoing catheter ablation included the age of the patient, number of diagnoses on the patient's record, and the total number of discharges from a hospital. The k-Nearest Neighbor had the best performance with a prediction accuracy of 85%. This was closely followed by Decision Tree, but Support Vector Machine was less ideal.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Machine learning methods can produce accurate models in predicting hospital readmissions for patients with AF. The likelihood of readmission to the hospital increases as the patient age, total number of hospital discharges, and total number of patient diagnoses increase. Findings from this study can inform quality improvement in healthcare and in achieving patient-centered care.</p>","PeriodicalId":12951,"journal":{"name":"Health Services Research and Managerial Epidemiology","volume":"7 ","pages":"2333392820961887"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/2333392820961887","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Services Research and Managerial Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2333392820961887","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) in the elderly population is projected to increase over the next several decades. Catheter ablation shows promise as a treatment option and is becoming increasingly available. We examined 90-day hospital readmission for AF patients undergoing catheter ablation and utilized machine learning methods to explore the risk factors associated with these readmission trends.

Methods: Data from the 2013 Nationwide Readmissions Database on AF cases were used to predict 90-day readmissions for AF with catheter ablation. Multiple machine learning methods such as k-Nearest Neighbors, Decision Tree, and Support Vector Machine were employed to determine variable importance and build risk prediction models. Accuracy, precision, sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve were compared for each model.

Results: The 90-day hospital readmission rate was 17.6%; the average age of the patients was 64.9 years; 62.9% of patients were male. Important variables in predicting 90-day hospital readmissions in patients with AF undergoing catheter ablation included the age of the patient, number of diagnoses on the patient's record, and the total number of discharges from a hospital. The k-Nearest Neighbor had the best performance with a prediction accuracy of 85%. This was closely followed by Decision Tree, but Support Vector Machine was less ideal.

Conclusions: Machine learning methods can produce accurate models in predicting hospital readmissions for patients with AF. The likelihood of readmission to the hospital increases as the patient age, total number of hospital discharges, and total number of patient diagnoses increase. Findings from this study can inform quality improvement in healthcare and in achieving patient-centered care.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

预测房颤患者90天再入院风险的机器学习方法:对医疗保健质量改善的影响
背景:在未来的几十年里,预计老年人群中的房颤(AF)将会增加。导管消融术作为一种治疗选择显示出良好的前景,并且越来越可行。我们研究了接受导管消融治疗的房颤患者90天的再入院情况,并利用机器学习方法探索与这些再入院趋势相关的危险因素。方法:使用2013年全国房颤再入院数据库中的数据预测房颤合并导管消融后90天内的再入院情况。采用k近邻、决策树、支持向量机等多种机器学习方法确定变量重要性,建立风险预测模型。比较各模型的准确度、精密度、灵敏度、特异性和曲线下面积。结果:90天再入院率为17.6%;患者平均年龄64.9岁;男性占62.9%。预测房颤导管消融患者90天再入院的重要变量包括患者年龄、患者记录中的诊断次数和出院总次数。k近邻的预测准确率最高,达到85%。紧随其后的是决策树,但支持向量机不太理想。结论:机器学习方法可以建立准确的模型来预测房颤患者的再入院情况。再入院的可能性随着患者年龄、出院总人数和诊断总人数的增加而增加。本研究的结果可以为提高医疗质量和实现以患者为中心的护理提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
6.20%
发文量
32
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信