Beyond safety and efficacy: sexuality-related priorities and their associations with contraceptive method selection

Q2 Medicine
Jenny A. Higgins , Kelsey Q. Wright , David K. Turok , Jessica N. Sanders
{"title":"Beyond safety and efficacy: sexuality-related priorities and their associations with contraceptive method selection","authors":"Jenny A. Higgins ,&nbsp;Kelsey Q. Wright ,&nbsp;David K. Turok ,&nbsp;Jessica N. Sanders","doi":"10.1016/j.conx.2020.100038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Sexuality-related preferences have been understudied in contraceptive selection and uptake. Investigators endeavored to assess contraceptive preferences among patients selecting new methods at family planning clinics and to evaluate the degree to which two sexuality-related preferences are (a) valued and (b) associated with method selection.</p></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><p>Data were derived from the HER Salt Lake Contraceptive Initiative, a longitudinal cohort nested in a quasi-experimental, observational study enrolling 18–45-year-old patients at four family planning health centers in Salt Lake County. At the time of selecting the new method of their choice, participants reported the importance of nine factors in contraceptive method selection, including two sexuality-related preferences: a method's lack of impact on libido and its lack of sexual interruption. Analyses involved multinomial logistic regression with method selected as the outcome, sexuality-related factors as the main explanatory variables, and a range of controls and covariates.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Among 2188 individuals seeking new contraceptive methods, the factors most frequently cited as <em>quite</em> or <em>extremely important</em> were safety (98%), effectiveness (94%), not interrupting sex (81%), not impacting libido (81%) and lack of side effects (80%). Less frequently cited factors included partner acceptability (46%), lack of hormones (39%), friend recommendation (29%) and alignment with religious beliefs (11%). Multivariate models documented no significant associations between sexual-related priorities and method selection.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Many contraceptive seekers rank sexual-related priorities alongside safety and efficacy as very important, but a range of methods align with people's sexual priorities.</p></div><div><h3>Implications</h3><p>Since patients endorse the importance of sexual-related contraceptive factors (impact on libido, impact on sexual interruption) alongside safety and efficacy, contraceptive research, counseling and care should attend to people's sexuality.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10655,"journal":{"name":"Contraception: X","volume":"2 ","pages":"Article 100038"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.conx.2020.100038","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contraception: X","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590151620300216","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

Objectives

Sexuality-related preferences have been understudied in contraceptive selection and uptake. Investigators endeavored to assess contraceptive preferences among patients selecting new methods at family planning clinics and to evaluate the degree to which two sexuality-related preferences are (a) valued and (b) associated with method selection.

Study design

Data were derived from the HER Salt Lake Contraceptive Initiative, a longitudinal cohort nested in a quasi-experimental, observational study enrolling 18–45-year-old patients at four family planning health centers in Salt Lake County. At the time of selecting the new method of their choice, participants reported the importance of nine factors in contraceptive method selection, including two sexuality-related preferences: a method's lack of impact on libido and its lack of sexual interruption. Analyses involved multinomial logistic regression with method selected as the outcome, sexuality-related factors as the main explanatory variables, and a range of controls and covariates.

Results

Among 2188 individuals seeking new contraceptive methods, the factors most frequently cited as quite or extremely important were safety (98%), effectiveness (94%), not interrupting sex (81%), not impacting libido (81%) and lack of side effects (80%). Less frequently cited factors included partner acceptability (46%), lack of hormones (39%), friend recommendation (29%) and alignment with religious beliefs (11%). Multivariate models documented no significant associations between sexual-related priorities and method selection.

Conclusions

Many contraceptive seekers rank sexual-related priorities alongside safety and efficacy as very important, but a range of methods align with people's sexual priorities.

Implications

Since patients endorse the importance of sexual-related contraceptive factors (impact on libido, impact on sexual interruption) alongside safety and efficacy, contraceptive research, counseling and care should attend to people's sexuality.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

安全性和有效性之外:与性有关的优先事项及其与避孕方法选择的关系
目的在避孕药具的选择和使用中,性取向相关的偏好还没有得到充分的研究。调查人员试图评估在计划生育诊所选择新方法的患者的避孕偏好,并评估两种与性有关的偏好在多大程度上(a)受到重视,(b)与方法选择相关联。研究设计数据来源于HER盐湖避孕计划,这是一项纵向队列嵌套的准实验观察性研究,纳入了盐湖城县四个计划生育健康中心的18 - 45岁患者。在选择他们所选择的新方法时,参与者报告了避孕方法选择中的九个因素的重要性,包括两个与性有关的偏好:一种方法对性欲缺乏影响,以及它不中断性行为。分析采用多项逻辑回归,选择方法作为结果,性相关因素作为主要解释变量,以及一系列控制变量和协变量。结果在2188名寻求新避孕方法的患者中,安全性(98%)、有效性(94%)、不中断性生活(81%)、不影响性欲(81%)和无副作用(80%)被认为是相当或极其重要的因素。较少被提及的因素包括伴侣可接受性(46%)、缺乏激素(39%)、朋友推荐(29%)和宗教信仰(11%)。多变量模型显示,与性相关的优先级和方法选择之间没有显著关联。结论:许多避孕者将性相关的优先事项与安全性和有效性并列,这是非常重要的,但一系列方法与人们的性优先事项一致。由于患者认同与性有关的避孕因素(对性欲的影响,对性中断的影响)以及安全性和有效性的重要性,避孕研究,咨询和护理应该关注人们的性行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Contraception: X
Contraception: X Medicine-Obstetrics and Gynecology
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
22 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信