{"title":"What Does CME Accreditation Stand for?","authors":"Reinhard Griebenow, Peter Mills, Joerg Stein","doi":"10.1080/21614083.2020.1822665","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Independence has been top of the agenda of accrediting bodies worldwide for many years and has just recently been aligned in a consensus document [1] adopted by major accrediting bodies. Furthermore, independence from any undue third-party influence has also been a top criterion to be assessed in the accreditation process. As a result, currently accrediting bodies demand that faculty should be carefully selected, in particular with regard to competing interests, and representatives of commercial interests can at no point take a role in continuing medical education(CME). Nevertheless, the Marburger Bund (MB) position paper on the independence of CME [2] reminds us that aiming at the independence of CME needs to take a holistic view of all the factors which have an impact on items relevant to CME and its outcome. Though this position paper relates to a German background, it addresses some issues of general importance for medical education in general, and CME accreditation in particular:","PeriodicalId":87300,"journal":{"name":"Journal of European CME","volume":"9 1","pages":"1822665"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/21614083.2020.1822665","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of European CME","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21614083.2020.1822665","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
Independence has been top of the agenda of accrediting bodies worldwide for many years and has just recently been aligned in a consensus document [1] adopted by major accrediting bodies. Furthermore, independence from any undue third-party influence has also been a top criterion to be assessed in the accreditation process. As a result, currently accrediting bodies demand that faculty should be carefully selected, in particular with regard to competing interests, and representatives of commercial interests can at no point take a role in continuing medical education(CME). Nevertheless, the Marburger Bund (MB) position paper on the independence of CME [2] reminds us that aiming at the independence of CME needs to take a holistic view of all the factors which have an impact on items relevant to CME and its outcome. Though this position paper relates to a German background, it addresses some issues of general importance for medical education in general, and CME accreditation in particular: