Strategies to Optimize Axillary Surgery in Patients With Breast Cancer Receiving Neoadjuvant Endocrine Therapy.

Anna Weiss, Elizabeth A Mittendorf, Tari A King
{"title":"Strategies to Optimize Axillary Surgery in Patients With Breast Cancer Receiving Neoadjuvant Endocrine Therapy.","authors":"Anna Weiss,&nbsp;Elizabeth A Mittendorf,&nbsp;Tari A King","doi":"10.46883/ONC.2020.3410.0397","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Current guidelines for axillary surgery following systemic therapy do not differentiate between neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET) and neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). Without specific guidelines, many assume that axillary surgery after NET should mirror that after NAC; however, NET has traditionally been used for patients with biologically favorable disease, so alternative axillary surgery strategies may be appropriate. Unfortunately, clinical trials that have examined NET have not rigorously studied axillary management or outcomes. The limited observational data available reveal that axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) is less frequently performed for positive nodes following NET than NAC; ALND rates after NET are more like those of upfront surgery patients. Although outcomes of omitting ALND after NET in patients who remain node positive are unknown, hypothesis-generating work from the National Cancer Database suggests that most patients selected for NET have limited nodal burden, and the prognostic significance of residual nodal disease after NET may not carry the same implications as residual disease after NAC. As such, there is opportunity to define axillary surgery strategies after NET that differ from those used after NAC.</p>","PeriodicalId":520728,"journal":{"name":"Oncology (Williston Park, N.Y.)","volume":" ","pages":"397-404"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncology (Williston Park, N.Y.)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46883/ONC.2020.3410.0397","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Current guidelines for axillary surgery following systemic therapy do not differentiate between neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET) and neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). Without specific guidelines, many assume that axillary surgery after NET should mirror that after NAC; however, NET has traditionally been used for patients with biologically favorable disease, so alternative axillary surgery strategies may be appropriate. Unfortunately, clinical trials that have examined NET have not rigorously studied axillary management or outcomes. The limited observational data available reveal that axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) is less frequently performed for positive nodes following NET than NAC; ALND rates after NET are more like those of upfront surgery patients. Although outcomes of omitting ALND after NET in patients who remain node positive are unknown, hypothesis-generating work from the National Cancer Database suggests that most patients selected for NET have limited nodal burden, and the prognostic significance of residual nodal disease after NET may not carry the same implications as residual disease after NAC. As such, there is opportunity to define axillary surgery strategies after NET that differ from those used after NAC.

在接受新辅助内分泌治疗的乳腺癌患者中优化腋窝手术策略。
目前的腋窝手术指南没有区分新辅助内分泌治疗(NET)和新辅助化疗(NAC)。由于没有具体的指导方针,许多人认为NET后的腋窝手术应与NAC后的腋窝手术一致;然而,NET传统上用于生物学上有利的疾病患者,因此替代腋窝手术策略可能是合适的。不幸的是,检查NET的临床试验并没有严格研究腋窝的管理或结果。有限的观察数据显示,与NAC相比,NET后阳性淋巴结进行腋窝淋巴结清扫(ALND)的频率较低;NET后的ALND率更接近于前期手术患者。虽然淋巴结阳性患者在NET后省略ALND的结果尚不清楚,但来自国家癌症数据库的假设生成工作表明,大多数选择NET的患者的淋巴结负担有限,NET后残留淋巴结疾病的预后意义可能与NAC后残留淋巴结疾病的预后意义不同。因此,有机会确定NET后与NAC后不同的腋窝手术策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信