How to communicate with families living in complete isolation.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Giovanni Mistraletti, Giuseppe Gristina, Sara Mascarin, Emanuele Iacobone, Ilaria Giubbilo, Silvia Bonfanti, Federico Fiocca, Giorgio Fullin, Ennio Fuselli, Maria Grazia Bocci, Davide Mazzon, Gian Domenico Giusti, Alessandro Galazzi, Alessandra Negro, Fabio De Iaco, Enrico Gandolfo, Giulia Lamiani, Silvia Del Negro, Laura Monti, Fabrizia Salvago, Silvia Di Leo, Maria Nefeli Gribaudi, Mariassunta Piccinni, Luigi Riccioni, Alberto Giannini, Sergio Livigni, Carla Maglione, Marco Vergano, Franco Marinangeli, Luisa Lovato, Andrea Mezzetti, Elio Drigo, Elena Vegni, Sally Calva, Anna Aprile, Gianfranco Losi, Lucia Fontanella, Giulio Calegari, Cristina Ansaloni, Francesco Rocco Pugliese, Salvatore Manca, Luciano Orsi, Fabrizio Moggia, Silvia Scelsi, Antonio Corcione, Flavia Petrini
{"title":"How to communicate with families living in complete isolation.","authors":"Giovanni Mistraletti, Giuseppe Gristina, Sara Mascarin, Emanuele Iacobone, Ilaria Giubbilo, Silvia Bonfanti, Federico Fiocca, Giorgio Fullin, Ennio Fuselli, Maria Grazia Bocci, Davide Mazzon, Gian Domenico Giusti, Alessandro Galazzi, Alessandra Negro, Fabio De Iaco, Enrico Gandolfo, Giulia Lamiani, Silvia Del Negro, Laura Monti, Fabrizia Salvago, Silvia Di Leo, Maria Nefeli Gribaudi, Mariassunta Piccinni, Luigi Riccioni, Alberto Giannini, Sergio Livigni, Carla Maglione, Marco Vergano, Franco Marinangeli, Luisa Lovato, Andrea Mezzetti, Elio Drigo, Elena Vegni, Sally Calva, Anna Aprile, Gianfranco Losi, Lucia Fontanella, Giulio Calegari, Cristina Ansaloni, Francesco Rocco Pugliese, Salvatore Manca, Luciano Orsi, Fabrizio Moggia, Silvia Scelsi, Antonio Corcione, Flavia Petrini","doi":"10.1136/bmjspcare-2020-002633","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>During the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, a complete physical isolation has been worldwide introduced. The impossibility of visiting their loved ones during the hospital stay causes additional distress for families: in addition to the worries about clinical recovery, they may feel exclusion and powerlessness, anxiety, depression, mistrust in the care team and post-traumatic stress disorder. The impossibility of conducting the daily meetings with families poses a challenge for healthcare professionals.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This paper aims to delineate and share consensus statements in order to enable healthcare team to provide by telephone or video calls an optimal level of communication with patient's relatives under circumstances of complete isolation.</p><p><strong>Evidence review: </strong>PubMed, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Database of Abstracts and Reviews of Effectiveness and the AHCPR Clinical Guidelines and Evidence Reports were explored from 1999 to 2019. Exclusion criteria were: poor or absent relevance regarding the aim of the consensus statements, studies prior to 1999, non-English language. Since the present pandemic context is completely new, unexpected and unexplored, there are not randomised controlled trials regarding clinical communication in a setting of complete isolation. Thus, a multiprofessional taskforce of physicians, nurses, psychologists and legal experts, together with some family members and former intensive care unit patients was established by four Italian national scientific societies. Using an e-Delphi methodology, general and specific questions were posed, relevant topics were argumented, until arriving to delineate position statements and practical checklist, which were set and evaluated through an evidence-based consensus procedure.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Ten statements and two practical checklists for phone or video calls were drafted and evaluated; they are related to who, when, why and how family members must be given clinical information under circumstances of complete isolation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>The statements and the checklists offer a structured methodology in order to ensure a good-quality communication between healthcare team and family members even in isolation, confirming that time dedicated to communication has to be intended as a time of care.</p>","PeriodicalId":9136,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care","volume":" ","pages":"e2954-e2965"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjspcare-2020-002633","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: During the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, a complete physical isolation has been worldwide introduced. The impossibility of visiting their loved ones during the hospital stay causes additional distress for families: in addition to the worries about clinical recovery, they may feel exclusion and powerlessness, anxiety, depression, mistrust in the care team and post-traumatic stress disorder. The impossibility of conducting the daily meetings with families poses a challenge for healthcare professionals.

Objective: This paper aims to delineate and share consensus statements in order to enable healthcare team to provide by telephone or video calls an optimal level of communication with patient's relatives under circumstances of complete isolation.

Evidence review: PubMed, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Database of Abstracts and Reviews of Effectiveness and the AHCPR Clinical Guidelines and Evidence Reports were explored from 1999 to 2019. Exclusion criteria were: poor or absent relevance regarding the aim of the consensus statements, studies prior to 1999, non-English language. Since the present pandemic context is completely new, unexpected and unexplored, there are not randomised controlled trials regarding clinical communication in a setting of complete isolation. Thus, a multiprofessional taskforce of physicians, nurses, psychologists and legal experts, together with some family members and former intensive care unit patients was established by four Italian national scientific societies. Using an e-Delphi methodology, general and specific questions were posed, relevant topics were argumented, until arriving to delineate position statements and practical checklist, which were set and evaluated through an evidence-based consensus procedure.

Findings: Ten statements and two practical checklists for phone or video calls were drafted and evaluated; they are related to who, when, why and how family members must be given clinical information under circumstances of complete isolation.

Conclusions and relevance: The statements and the checklists offer a structured methodology in order to ensure a good-quality communication between healthcare team and family members even in isolation, confirming that time dedicated to communication has to be intended as a time of care.

如何与完全与世隔绝的家庭沟通。
重要意义在 SARS-CoV-2 大流行期间,全世界都实行了完全的物理隔离。住院期间无法探望亲人给家属带来了额外的痛苦:除了担心临床康复外,他们还可能感到被排斥和无能为力、焦虑、抑郁、对护理团队的不信任以及创伤后应激障碍。无法与家属进行日常会面给医护人员带来了挑战:本文旨在阐述和分享共识声明,以便医疗团队在完全隔离的情况下通过电话或视频通话与患者亲属进行最佳沟通:PubMed、Cochrane系统性综述数据库、摘要和有效性综述数据库以及AHCPR临床指南和证据报告是1999年至2019年期间的研究对象。排除标准为:与共识声明目的相关性差或不相关、1999 年之前的研究、非英语语言。由于目前的大流行背景是全新的、意料之外的和未经探索的,因此没有关于在完全隔离的环境中进行临床沟通的随机对照试验。因此,意大利四个国家科学协会成立了一个由医生、护士、心理学家、法律专家以及一些家庭成员和重症监护室前病人组成的多专业工作组。采用电子德尔菲方法,提出了一般性问题和具体问题,对相关主题进行了论证,最终确定了立场声明和实用清单,并通过循证共识程序对这些声明和清单进行了评估:起草并评估了十项声明和两份用于电话或视频通话的实用清单;它们涉及在完全隔离的情况下必须向家庭成员提供临床信息的人员、时间、原因和方式:这些声明和核对表提供了一种结构化的方法,以确保医疗团队与家属之间即使在隔离状态下也能进行高质量的沟通,这也证实了专门用于沟通的时间必须被视为护理时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care
BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
7.40%
发文量
170
期刊介绍: Published quarterly in print and continuously online, BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care aims to connect many disciplines and specialties throughout the world by providing high quality, clinically relevant research, reviews, comment, information and news of international importance. We hold an inclusive view of supportive and palliative care research and we are able to call on expertise to critique the whole range of methodologies within the subject, including those working in transitional research, clinical trials, epidemiology, behavioural sciences, ethics and health service research. Articles with relevance to clinical practice and clinical service development will be considered for publication. In an international context, many different categories of clinician and healthcare workers do clinical work associated with palliative medicine, specialist or generalist palliative care, supportive care, psychosocial-oncology and end of life care. We wish to engage many specialties, not only those traditionally associated with supportive and palliative care. We hope to extend the readership to doctors, nurses, other healthcare workers and researchers in medical and surgical specialties, including but not limited to cardiology, gastroenterology, geriatrics, neurology, oncology, paediatrics, primary care, psychiatry, psychology, renal medicine, respiratory medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信