Raphael Schezaro-Ramos, Rita C Collaço, José C Cogo, Cháriston A Dal-Belo, Léa Rodrigues-Simioni, Thalita Rocha, Priscila Randazzo-Moura
{"title":"<i>Cordia salicifolia</i> and <i>Lafoensia pacari</i> plant extracts against the local effects of <i>Bothrops jararacussu</i> and <i>Philodryas olfersii</i> snake venoms.","authors":"Raphael Schezaro-Ramos, Rita C Collaço, José C Cogo, Cháriston A Dal-Belo, Léa Rodrigues-Simioni, Thalita Rocha, Priscila Randazzo-Moura","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Philodryas olfersii</i> produces similar local effects to <i>Bothrops jararacussu</i> snakebite, which can induce misidentification and bothropic antivenom administration. Antivenom therapy is effective, but has its limitations regarding local damage. Since plants are used in folk medicine to treat snakebite victims, we evaluated the protective properties of <i>Cordia salicifolia</i> and <i>Lafoensia pacari</i> extracts against <i>Philodryas olfersii</i> and <i>Bothrops jararacussu</i> venoms. Preparations pretreated with both extracts inhibited > 90% the <i>B. jararacussu</i> venom-induced neuromuscular blockade, and 52% to 81% the <i>P. olfersii</i> venom-induced blockade. <i>C. salicifolia</i> inhibited the myonecrosis promoted by both venoms; however, <i>L. pacari</i> prevented only the myofilaments hypercontraction. Regarding haemorrhagic activity, <i>C. salicifolia</i> was more effective against <i>B. jararacussu</i> venom, while <i>L. pacari</i> was more effective against <i>P. olfersii</i> venom. On the other hand, for oedema-forming activity the results were the opposite. Considering that both extracts prevented (to different levels) the main manifestations of both snakebites (local symptoms), we endorse further studies involving these plants as coadjuvant in snakebite therapeutics.</p>","PeriodicalId":17653,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Venom Research","volume":"10 ","pages":"32-37"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/62/e4/JVR-10-32.PMC7512476.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Venom Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Philodryas olfersii produces similar local effects to Bothrops jararacussu snakebite, which can induce misidentification and bothropic antivenom administration. Antivenom therapy is effective, but has its limitations regarding local damage. Since plants are used in folk medicine to treat snakebite victims, we evaluated the protective properties of Cordia salicifolia and Lafoensia pacari extracts against Philodryas olfersii and Bothrops jararacussu venoms. Preparations pretreated with both extracts inhibited > 90% the B. jararacussu venom-induced neuromuscular blockade, and 52% to 81% the P. olfersii venom-induced blockade. C. salicifolia inhibited the myonecrosis promoted by both venoms; however, L. pacari prevented only the myofilaments hypercontraction. Regarding haemorrhagic activity, C. salicifolia was more effective against B. jararacussu venom, while L. pacari was more effective against P. olfersii venom. On the other hand, for oedema-forming activity the results were the opposite. Considering that both extracts prevented (to different levels) the main manifestations of both snakebites (local symptoms), we endorse further studies involving these plants as coadjuvant in snakebite therapeutics.