Traumatic Peripheral Arterial Injury with Open Repair: A 10-Year Single-Institutional Analysis.

Q3 Medicine
Hoseong Cho, Up Huh, Chung Won Lee, Seunghwan Song, Seon Hee Kim, Sung Woon Chung
{"title":"Traumatic Peripheral Arterial Injury with Open Repair: A 10-Year Single-Institutional Analysis.","authors":"Hoseong Cho,&nbsp;Up Huh,&nbsp;Chung Won Lee,&nbsp;Seunghwan Song,&nbsp;Seon Hee Kim,&nbsp;Sung Woon Chung","doi":"10.5090/kjtcs.19.087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We report our 10-year experience with traumatic peripheral arterial injury repair at an urban level I trauma center.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between January 2007 and December 2016, 28 adult trauma patients presented with traumatic peripheral arterial injuries. Data were retrospectively collected on demographic characteristics, the mechanism of injury, the type of vascular injury, and physiological status on initial assessment. The analysis also included the Mangled Extremity Severity Score (MESS), Injury Severity Score, surgical procedures, and outcome variables including limb salvage, hospital stay, intensive care unit stay, and postoperative vascular complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four (14.3%) patients required amputation due to failed revascularization. MESS significantly differed between patients with blunt and penetrating trauma (8.2±2.2 vs. 5.8±1.3, respectively; p=0.005). The amputation rate was not significantly different between patients with blunt and penetrating trauma (20% vs. 0%, respectively; p=0.295). The overall mortality rate was 3.6% (1 patient).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Blunt trauma was associated with higher MESS than penetrating trauma, and amputation was more frequent. In particular, patients with blunt trauma had significantly higher MESS than patients with penetrating trauma (8.2±2.2 vs. 5.8±1.3, respectively; p=0.005), and amputation was performed when revascularization failed in cases of blunt trauma of the lower extremity. Therefore, particular care is needed in making treatment decisions for patients with peripheral arterial injuries caused by blunt trauma.</p>","PeriodicalId":38678,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery","volume":"53 5","pages":"291-296"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/4e/de/KJTCV-53-291.PMC7553829.pdf","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5090/kjtcs.19.087","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Background: We report our 10-year experience with traumatic peripheral arterial injury repair at an urban level I trauma center.

Methods: Between January 2007 and December 2016, 28 adult trauma patients presented with traumatic peripheral arterial injuries. Data were retrospectively collected on demographic characteristics, the mechanism of injury, the type of vascular injury, and physiological status on initial assessment. The analysis also included the Mangled Extremity Severity Score (MESS), Injury Severity Score, surgical procedures, and outcome variables including limb salvage, hospital stay, intensive care unit stay, and postoperative vascular complications.

Results: Four (14.3%) patients required amputation due to failed revascularization. MESS significantly differed between patients with blunt and penetrating trauma (8.2±2.2 vs. 5.8±1.3, respectively; p=0.005). The amputation rate was not significantly different between patients with blunt and penetrating trauma (20% vs. 0%, respectively; p=0.295). The overall mortality rate was 3.6% (1 patient).

Conclusion: Blunt trauma was associated with higher MESS than penetrating trauma, and amputation was more frequent. In particular, patients with blunt trauma had significantly higher MESS than patients with penetrating trauma (8.2±2.2 vs. 5.8±1.3, respectively; p=0.005), and amputation was performed when revascularization failed in cases of blunt trauma of the lower extremity. Therefore, particular care is needed in making treatment decisions for patients with peripheral arterial injuries caused by blunt trauma.

外伤性外周动脉损伤开放性修复:10年单一机构分析。
背景:我们报告了我们在城市一级创伤中心进行外伤性外周动脉损伤修复的10年经验。方法:2007年1月至2016年12月,选取28例外伤性外周动脉损伤的成人外伤患者。回顾性收集患者的人口学特征、损伤机制、血管损伤类型和初步评估时的生理状况。分析还包括断肢严重程度评分(MESS)、损伤严重程度评分、手术程序和结果变量,包括肢体保留、住院时间、重症监护病房时间和术后血管并发症。结果:4例(14.3%)患者因血运重建失败需要截肢。钝性和穿透性创伤患者的MESS差异显著(分别为8.2±2.2和5.8±1.3);p = 0.005)。钝性和穿透性创伤患者的截肢率无显著差异(分别为20%和0%);p = 0.295)。总死亡率为3.6%(1例)。结论:钝性创伤的MESS高于穿透性创伤,且截肢发生率更高。特别是钝性创伤患者的MESS明显高于穿透性创伤患者(分别为8.2±2.2比5.8±1.3);P =0.005),当下肢钝性创伤血运重建失败时进行截肢。因此,对于钝性创伤引起的外周动脉损伤患者,在做出治疗决定时需要特别小心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
36 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信