Kidney efficiency index quantitative parameter of a dynamic renal scintigraphy. II. usefulness in the diagnosis of obstructive nephropathy.

IF 0.6 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Pawel Cichocki, Krzysztof Filipczak, Anna Plachcinska, Jacek Kusmierek
{"title":"Kidney efficiency index quantitative parameter of a dynamic renal scintigraphy. II. usefulness in the diagnosis of obstructive nephropathy.","authors":"Pawel Cichocki,&nbsp;Krzysztof Filipczak,&nbsp;Anna Plachcinska,&nbsp;Jacek Kusmierek","doi":"10.5603/NMR.2020.0018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>One of the main indications for DRS is a diagnosis of obstructive uro-/nephropathy. In standard practice, this study includes the assessment of sequential scintigraphic images, renographic curves and such quantitative parameters as TMAX, T1/2 and split function of each kidney (SF). Due to the relative nature of SF and limitations of diagnostic capabilities of TMAX and T1/2, DRS was expanded to include new quantitative parameters describing kidney function in absolute values. This study aims to evaluate the usefulness of kidney efficiency index (KEi) - new, in-house developed parameter proportional to the average clearance function of the kidney.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The study included 156 people aged 18-84 (average 51) years. The first group, from which normative values of new parameters were determined, consisted of 20 healthy volunteers. The second group consisted of 136 patients selected retrospectively, based on archived scintigraphic data. \"Normalcy rate\" (percentage of normal results among selected 62 patients with a low likelihood of obstructive uro-/nephropathy) was used to evaluate the reliability of KEi. A comparative differential analysis of obstructive uro-/nephropathy, based on standard and new DRS parameters, was performed on selected 74 patients (92 kidneys) with single functioning kidney or bilateral obstructive uropathy, where SF is unreliable.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Normative values: KEi ≥ 8; Normalcy rate for KEi: 95%. In comparison with standard DRS evaluation, application of KEi changed the diagnosis in 1/3 of assessed kidneys (from uropathy to nephropathy in 27/92 kidneys and vice versa in 4 kidneys).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>KEi enables reproducible, quantitative assessment of absolute kidney function without any modifications of the standard DRS protocol. Its values can be compared between independent studies (e.g. follow-up examinations). KEi corrected the diagnosis of obstructive uro-/nephropathy in cases of single functioning kidney or bilateral obstructive uropathy.</p>","PeriodicalId":44718,"journal":{"name":"NUCLEAR MEDICINE REVIEW","volume":"23 2","pages":"84-88"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NUCLEAR MEDICINE REVIEW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5603/NMR.2020.0018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: One of the main indications for DRS is a diagnosis of obstructive uro-/nephropathy. In standard practice, this study includes the assessment of sequential scintigraphic images, renographic curves and such quantitative parameters as TMAX, T1/2 and split function of each kidney (SF). Due to the relative nature of SF and limitations of diagnostic capabilities of TMAX and T1/2, DRS was expanded to include new quantitative parameters describing kidney function in absolute values. This study aims to evaluate the usefulness of kidney efficiency index (KEi) - new, in-house developed parameter proportional to the average clearance function of the kidney.

Material and methods: The study included 156 people aged 18-84 (average 51) years. The first group, from which normative values of new parameters were determined, consisted of 20 healthy volunteers. The second group consisted of 136 patients selected retrospectively, based on archived scintigraphic data. "Normalcy rate" (percentage of normal results among selected 62 patients with a low likelihood of obstructive uro-/nephropathy) was used to evaluate the reliability of KEi. A comparative differential analysis of obstructive uro-/nephropathy, based on standard and new DRS parameters, was performed on selected 74 patients (92 kidneys) with single functioning kidney or bilateral obstructive uropathy, where SF is unreliable.

Results: Normative values: KEi ≥ 8; Normalcy rate for KEi: 95%. In comparison with standard DRS evaluation, application of KEi changed the diagnosis in 1/3 of assessed kidneys (from uropathy to nephropathy in 27/92 kidneys and vice versa in 4 kidneys).

Conclusions: KEi enables reproducible, quantitative assessment of absolute kidney function without any modifications of the standard DRS protocol. Its values can be compared between independent studies (e.g. follow-up examinations). KEi corrected the diagnosis of obstructive uro-/nephropathy in cases of single functioning kidney or bilateral obstructive uropathy.

动态肾显像肾效率指数定量参数。2对阻塞性肾病的诊断价值。
背景:DRS的主要适应症之一是诊断梗阻性肾病。在标准实践中,本研究包括对序列扫描图像、肾图曲线以及各肾TMAX、T1/2和劈裂功能(SF)等定量参数的评估。由于SF的相对性质和TMAX和T1/2诊断能力的局限性,DRS扩展到包括新的定量参数,以绝对值描述肾功能。本研究旨在评估肾效率指数(KEi)的有效性,这是一种新的、内部开发的参数,与肾脏的平均清除功能成正比。材料与方法:研究对象为年龄18-84岁(平均51岁)的156人。第一组由20名健康志愿者组成,从中确定新参数的规范性值。第二组是根据存档的星图资料回顾性选择的136例患者。“正常率”(在选定的62例低可能性梗阻性肾病患者中正常结果的百分比)用于评估KEi的可靠性。基于标准和新的DRS参数,对74例(92个肾脏)单肾功能或双侧梗阻性尿病患者(SF不可靠)进行了阻塞性尿病/肾病的比较差异分析。结果:规范值:KEi≥8;KEi的正常发生率:95%。与标准DRS评估相比,KEi的应用改变了1/3被评估肾脏的诊断(27/92个肾脏从泌尿病变转为肾病,4个肾脏反之)。结论:KEi能够在不修改任何标准DRS方案的情况下对绝对肾功能进行可重复、定量的评估。其值可以在独立研究(如随访检查)之间进行比较。KEi纠正了单侧功能肾脏或双侧梗阻性尿病的梗阻性肾病的诊断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
NUCLEAR MEDICINE REVIEW
NUCLEAR MEDICINE REVIEW RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
53
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: Written in English, NMR is a biannual international periodical of scientific and educational profile. It is a journal of Bulgarian, Czech, Hungarian, Macedonian, Polish, Romanian, Russian, Slovak, Ukrainian and Yugoslav Societies of Nuclear Medicine. The periodical focuses on all nuclear medicine topics (diagnostics as well as therapy), and presents original experimental scientific papers, reviews, case studies, letters also news about symposia and congresses. NMR is indexed at Index Copernicus (7.41), Scopus, EMBASE, Index Medicus/Medline, Ministry of Education 2007 (4 pts.).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信