Asylum Caseworkers' Experience Working in Lesvos: A Grounded Theory Analysis.

Emilia Munteanu, Ian Barron
{"title":"Asylum Caseworkers' Experience Working in Lesvos: A Grounded Theory Analysis.","authors":"Emilia Munteanu, Ian Barron","doi":"10.1080/26408066.2020.1797605","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PURPOSE\nAssisting asylum applicants through their procedure for international protection implies a commitment that most caseworkers accept with deep satisfaction. However, working with asylum applicants who disclose the claim for protection and stories of their journey can be challenging and distressing. The study aimed to understand the experience of caseworkers with the asylum applicants in Lesvos, specifically, the challenges they face and their perception of the qualities that facilitated or inhibited coping.\n\n\nMETHOD\nA grounded theory analysis within a constructivist framework involved interviews with thirteen caseworkers, cultural mediators, and operations officers in Levos and Malta.\n\n\nFINDINGS\nA two-phase analysis was conducted due to unexpected findings. The first phase of the analysis uncovered the challenges posed by the work itself, and the caseworkers' personal characteristics which were either helping or hindering addressing these challenges. The second analysis revealed a four-step process as perceived by the asylum caseworkers: starting from the work context, facing challenges, finding ways to respond to them, and finally, the effect that this process had on the caseworkers' perspective about themselves and life.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nFor those who developed adaptative coping, interviews indicated a process of transformation in the caseworkers' perception, a new sense of self and world view, including the development of self-awareness, personal power, the relation to work and the refugees, and a deeper cultural understanding. Recommendations are provided for caseworkers' mental-health and operational support as well as for future research.","PeriodicalId":73742,"journal":{"name":"Journal of evidence-based social work (2019)","volume":"18 3","pages":"249-283"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/26408066.2020.1797605","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of evidence-based social work (2019)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/26408066.2020.1797605","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/9/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PURPOSE Assisting asylum applicants through their procedure for international protection implies a commitment that most caseworkers accept with deep satisfaction. However, working with asylum applicants who disclose the claim for protection and stories of their journey can be challenging and distressing. The study aimed to understand the experience of caseworkers with the asylum applicants in Lesvos, specifically, the challenges they face and their perception of the qualities that facilitated or inhibited coping. METHOD A grounded theory analysis within a constructivist framework involved interviews with thirteen caseworkers, cultural mediators, and operations officers in Levos and Malta. FINDINGS A two-phase analysis was conducted due to unexpected findings. The first phase of the analysis uncovered the challenges posed by the work itself, and the caseworkers' personal characteristics which were either helping or hindering addressing these challenges. The second analysis revealed a four-step process as perceived by the asylum caseworkers: starting from the work context, facing challenges, finding ways to respond to them, and finally, the effect that this process had on the caseworkers' perspective about themselves and life. CONCLUSION For those who developed adaptative coping, interviews indicated a process of transformation in the caseworkers' perception, a new sense of self and world view, including the development of self-awareness, personal power, the relation to work and the refugees, and a deeper cultural understanding. Recommendations are provided for caseworkers' mental-health and operational support as well as for future research.
庇护个案工作者在莱斯沃斯的工作经验:一个扎根的理论分析。
目的:通过国际保护程序协助庇护申请人意味着一项承诺,大多数社会工作者都非常满意地接受这项承诺。然而,与披露保护要求和旅程故事的庇护申请人一起工作可能是具有挑战性和痛苦的。这项研究的目的是了解个案工作者在莱斯沃斯处理庇护申请人的经验,特别是他们面临的挑战以及他们对促进或抑制应对的品质的看法。方法:在建构主义框架下的扎根理论分析涉及对13名案例工作者、文化调解员和利沃斯和马耳他的行动官员的访谈。发现:由于意外发现,进行了两阶段分析。分析的第一阶段揭示了工作本身所带来的挑战,以及社会工作者的个人特征,这些特征要么有助于解决这些挑战,要么阻碍解决这些挑战。第二个分析揭示了庇护个案工作者认为的四步过程:从工作环境开始,面对挑战,找到应对挑战的方法,最后,这个过程对个案工作者对自己和生活的看法产生的影响。结论:对于那些发展了适应性应对的个案工作者来说,访谈显示了他们感知的转变过程,一种新的自我意识和世界观,包括自我意识、个人权力、与工作和难民的关系的发展,以及更深的文化理解。为个案工作者的心理健康和业务支持以及未来的研究提供建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信