Levonorgestrel release rates measured through analysis of two-rod contraceptive explants

Q2 Medicine
Rachael Fuchs , Douglas Taylor , David W. Jenkins , Vivian Brache , Diane Luo , Laneta J. Dorflinger , Markus J. Steiner
{"title":"Levonorgestrel release rates measured through analysis of two-rod contraceptive explants","authors":"Rachael Fuchs ,&nbsp;Douglas Taylor ,&nbsp;David W. Jenkins ,&nbsp;Vivian Brache ,&nbsp;Diane Luo ,&nbsp;Laneta J. Dorflinger ,&nbsp;Markus J. Steiner","doi":"10.1016/j.conx.2020.100039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The objective was to characterize and compare in vivo rates of levonorgestrel (LNG) release from Sino-implant (II) and Jadelle® contraceptive implants.</p></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><p>We sampled 48 Sino-implant (II) and 49 Jadelle® explant sets for residual LNG content from participants treated for up to 51 months in a randomized contraceptive efficacy trial in the Dominican Republic (DR). Additional Sino-implant (II) explants were obtained from 8 women who became pregnant in the DR trial and 10 who contributed 3 to 5 years of use in a cohort study in China. Baseline LNG loads were estimated from five unused implant sets per device type. Release profiles were estimated using mixture models that captured initial burst fractions and compared with efficacy and pharmacokinetics data from the DR trial.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Estimated baseline LNG loads for Sino-implant (II) and Jadelle® were 142.8 mg and 150.5 mg, respectively (vs. the labeled 150 mg). There was an initial burst release of drug (5.6% and 7.9%, respectively) followed by an exponential decrease in LNG content evident for each device. Release rates were significantly lower for Sino-implant (II) throughout the treatment period, with estimated rates after 3 years of 24.2 mcg/day and 29.0 mcg/day for Sino-implant (II) and Jadelle®, respectively. The estimated Sino-implant (II) rate after 3 years was similar to the predicted rate after 5 years (23.6 mcg/day) for Jadelle® (rate ratio: 1.03; 95% confidence interval: 0.92–1.13).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Sino-implant (II) LNG release rates were significantly lower than Jadelle® with Sino-implant (II) rates through year 3 comparable to Jadelle® rates through year 5. These results reinforce the 3-year duration of action for which Sino-implant (II) was prequalified by the World Health Organization.</p></div><div><h3>Implications</h3><p>This analysis confirms the WHO prequalification of Sino-implant (II) for 3 years of use and supports different durations of action for Jadelle® and Sino-implant (II). It provides additional evidence that this approach can complement efficacy trials in determining duration of action of hormonal contraceptives in general.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10655,"journal":{"name":"Contraception: X","volume":"2 ","pages":"Article 100039"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.conx.2020.100039","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contraception: X","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590151620300228","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Objective

The objective was to characterize and compare in vivo rates of levonorgestrel (LNG) release from Sino-implant (II) and Jadelle® contraceptive implants.

Study design

We sampled 48 Sino-implant (II) and 49 Jadelle® explant sets for residual LNG content from participants treated for up to 51 months in a randomized contraceptive efficacy trial in the Dominican Republic (DR). Additional Sino-implant (II) explants were obtained from 8 women who became pregnant in the DR trial and 10 who contributed 3 to 5 years of use in a cohort study in China. Baseline LNG loads were estimated from five unused implant sets per device type. Release profiles were estimated using mixture models that captured initial burst fractions and compared with efficacy and pharmacokinetics data from the DR trial.

Results

Estimated baseline LNG loads for Sino-implant (II) and Jadelle® were 142.8 mg and 150.5 mg, respectively (vs. the labeled 150 mg). There was an initial burst release of drug (5.6% and 7.9%, respectively) followed by an exponential decrease in LNG content evident for each device. Release rates were significantly lower for Sino-implant (II) throughout the treatment period, with estimated rates after 3 years of 24.2 mcg/day and 29.0 mcg/day for Sino-implant (II) and Jadelle®, respectively. The estimated Sino-implant (II) rate after 3 years was similar to the predicted rate after 5 years (23.6 mcg/day) for Jadelle® (rate ratio: 1.03; 95% confidence interval: 0.92–1.13).

Conclusions

Sino-implant (II) LNG release rates were significantly lower than Jadelle® with Sino-implant (II) rates through year 3 comparable to Jadelle® rates through year 5. These results reinforce the 3-year duration of action for which Sino-implant (II) was prequalified by the World Health Organization.

Implications

This analysis confirms the WHO prequalification of Sino-implant (II) for 3 years of use and supports different durations of action for Jadelle® and Sino-implant (II). It provides additional evidence that this approach can complement efficacy trials in determining duration of action of hormonal contraceptives in general.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

双杆避孕外植体分析左炔诺孕酮释放率
目的表征和比较Sino-implant (II)和Jadelle®避孕植入物中左炔诺孕酮(LNG)的体内释放率。研究设计:我们在多米尼加共和国(DR)的一项随机避孕疗效试验中,从治疗长达51个月的参与者中取样了48组Sino-implant (II)和49组Jadelle®外植体,检测剩余LNG含量。另外的移植体来自8名在DR试验中怀孕的妇女,以及10名在中国一项队列研究中使用了3至5年的妇女。根据每种设备类型的五套未使用的植入物估计基线LNG负荷。使用混合模型估计释放曲线,该模型捕获了初始爆发分数,并比较了DR试验的疗效和药代动力学数据。结果Sino-implant (II)和Jadelle®的估计基线LNG负荷分别为142.8 mg和150.5 mg(与标记的150 mg相比)。每个装置的初始药物释放量分别为5.6%和7.9%,随后液化天然气含量呈指数下降。在整个治疗期间,Sino-implant (II)的释放率明显较低,3年后的释放率估计分别为24.2 mcg/天和29.0 mcg/天,Sino-implant (II)和Jadelle®。Jadelle®3年后的预估Sino-implant (II)率与5年后的预测率(23.6微克/天)相似(比率比:1.03;95%置信区间:0.92-1.13)。结论Sino-implant (II)的LNG释放率显著低于Jadelle®,Sino-implant (II)在第3年的释放率与Jadelle®在第5年的释放率相当。这些结果强化了Sino-implant (II)通过世界卫生组织资格预审的3年有效期。本分析证实了WHO对Sino-implant (II)使用3年的预审资格,并支持Jadelle®和Sino-implant (II)的不同作用时间。它提供了额外的证据,表明该方法可以补充药效试验,以确定一般激素避孕药的作用时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Contraception: X
Contraception: X Medicine-Obstetrics and Gynecology
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
22 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信