Using Simulation as an Investigative Methodology in Researching Competencies of Clinical Social Work Practice: A Scoping Review.

IF 2.7 3区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL WORK
Clinical Social Work Journal Pub Date : 2021-01-01 Epub Date: 2020-09-24 DOI:10.1007/s10615-020-00772-x
Kenta Asakura, Ruxandra M Gheorghe, Stephanie Borgen, Karen Sewell, Heather MacDonald
{"title":"Using Simulation as an Investigative Methodology in Researching Competencies of Clinical Social Work Practice: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Kenta Asakura, Ruxandra M Gheorghe, Stephanie Borgen, Karen Sewell, Heather MacDonald","doi":"10.1007/s10615-020-00772-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article reports a scoping review designed to synthesize current literature that used simulation as an investigative methodology (simulation-based research; SBR) in researching practice competencies in clinical social work. Following Arksey and O'Malley's scoping review framework, 24 articles were included in this scoping review. The majority of articles reported SBR studies conducted in Canada and the U.S. and were published in the last 10 years, signifying that this is a burgeoning area of research in clinical social work. Areas of clinical competencies included professional decision-making (33%), the role of cognition and emotion (21%), attending to culture and diversity (21%), and others, such as supervision skills (8%). Using qualitative (46%), quantitative (42%), and mixed methods (13%) in research design, more than half of the SBR studies reported in the selected articles used live actors (54%) to simulate a realistic practice situation for research. Selected articles also offered both benefits and limitations of SBR in social work. We offer suggestions for when to use SBR for research on clinical social work practice and strengthening a collaboration between clinicians and researchers in advancing practice-informed research.</p>","PeriodicalId":47314,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Social Work Journal","volume":"49 2","pages":"231-243"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7511269/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Social Work Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10615-020-00772-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/9/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article reports a scoping review designed to synthesize current literature that used simulation as an investigative methodology (simulation-based research; SBR) in researching practice competencies in clinical social work. Following Arksey and O'Malley's scoping review framework, 24 articles were included in this scoping review. The majority of articles reported SBR studies conducted in Canada and the U.S. and were published in the last 10 years, signifying that this is a burgeoning area of research in clinical social work. Areas of clinical competencies included professional decision-making (33%), the role of cognition and emotion (21%), attending to culture and diversity (21%), and others, such as supervision skills (8%). Using qualitative (46%), quantitative (42%), and mixed methods (13%) in research design, more than half of the SBR studies reported in the selected articles used live actors (54%) to simulate a realistic practice situation for research. Selected articles also offered both benefits and limitations of SBR in social work. We offer suggestions for when to use SBR for research on clinical social work practice and strengthening a collaboration between clinicians and researchers in advancing practice-informed research.

Abstract Image

将模拟作为研究临床社会工作实践能力的调查方法:范围综述》。
本文报告了一项范围界定综述,旨在综合当前使用模拟作为调查方法(基于模拟的研究;SBR)研究临床社会工作实践能力的文献。按照 Arksey 和 O'Malley 的范围界定综述框架,24 篇文章被纳入了此次范围界定综述。大多数文章都报告了在加拿大和美国进行的 SBR 研究,并且是在过去 10 年中发表的,这表明这是临床社会工作中一个新兴的研究领域。临床能力领域包括专业决策(33%)、认知和情感的作用(21%)、关注文化和多样性(21%)以及其他领域,如督导技能(8%)。在研究设计中使用了定性方法(46%)、定量方法(42%)和混合方法(13%),在所选文章中报告的 SBR 研究中,一半以上使用了真人演员(54%)来模拟真实的实践情境进行研究。所选文章还介绍了社会工作中使用 SBR 的好处和局限性。我们就何时使用 SBR 进行临床社会工作实践研究以及加强临床医生和研究人员之间的合作以推进实践为导向的研究提出了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
3.60%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: Clinical Social Work Journal is an international forum devoted to the advancement of clinical knowledge and acumen of practitioners, educators, researchers, and policymakers. The journal, founded in 1973, publishes leading peer-reviewed original articles germane to contemporary clinical practice with individuals, couples, families, and groups, and welcomes submissions that reflect innovations in theoretical, practice , evidence-based clinical research, and interdisciplinary approaches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信