Knowledge, attitudes and preparedness to respond to COVID-19 among the border population of northern Thailand in the early period of the pandemic: a cross-sectional study.
{"title":"Knowledge, attitudes and preparedness to respond to COVID-19 among the border population of northern Thailand in the early period of the pandemic: a cross-sectional study.","authors":"Peeradone Srichan, Tawatchai Apidechkul, Ratipark Tamornpark, Fartima Yeemard, Siriyaporn Khunthason, Siwarak Kitchanapaiboon, Pilasinee Wongnuch, Asamaphon Wongphaet, Panupong Upala","doi":"10.4103/2224-3151.294305","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chiang Rai province in northern Thailand is a site of many people travelling among nearby countries and areas, including Yunnan province, China. In February 2020, there was concern about the population's vulnerability to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted in 15 villages less than 10 km from a border. A questionnaire was developed and tested for reliability and validity; 48 questions covered participant characteristics, plus knowledge about, attitudes to and preparedness for COVID-19. Chi-squared tests were used to detect any significant association between variables. Unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to assess the possible association of various factors with participants' level of reported knowledge, attitudes and preparedness.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 520 participants were recruited of whom 320 (61.5%) were women. The age range was 18-90 years; the average age was 45.2 years. Variables with an association with good to moderate preparedness for COVID-19 prevention and control that remained after adjustment were: women were better prepared than men (adjusted odds ratio (OR<sub>adj</sub>) = 2.52; 95% CI = 1.36-4.68); those aged 18-30 years (OR<sub>adj</sub> = 4.26; 95% CI = 1.18-15.30), 31-45 years (OR<sub>adj</sub> = 4.60; 95% CI = 1.59-13.32) or 46-60 years (OR<sub>adj</sub> = 2.69; 95% CI = 1.16-6.26) were better prepared than those aged 60-90 years; and, compared with those with no formal education, those educated to primary school level (OR<sub>adj</sub> = 2.43; 95% CI = 1.09-5.43) or to university level (OR<sub>adj</sub> = 3.18; 95% CI = 1.06-9.51) were better prepared.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Effective communication of essential, accurate and up-to-date information regarding COVID-19 prevention and control is essential in this population - especially for men, older age groups and those lacking formal education.</p>","PeriodicalId":37393,"journal":{"name":"WHO South-East Asia journal of public health","volume":"9 2","pages":"118-125"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"50","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"WHO South-East Asia journal of public health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/2224-3151.294305","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 50
Abstract
Background: Chiang Rai province in northern Thailand is a site of many people travelling among nearby countries and areas, including Yunnan province, China. In February 2020, there was concern about the population's vulnerability to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).
Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in 15 villages less than 10 km from a border. A questionnaire was developed and tested for reliability and validity; 48 questions covered participant characteristics, plus knowledge about, attitudes to and preparedness for COVID-19. Chi-squared tests were used to detect any significant association between variables. Unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to assess the possible association of various factors with participants' level of reported knowledge, attitudes and preparedness.
Results: A total of 520 participants were recruited of whom 320 (61.5%) were women. The age range was 18-90 years; the average age was 45.2 years. Variables with an association with good to moderate preparedness for COVID-19 prevention and control that remained after adjustment were: women were better prepared than men (adjusted odds ratio (ORadj) = 2.52; 95% CI = 1.36-4.68); those aged 18-30 years (ORadj = 4.26; 95% CI = 1.18-15.30), 31-45 years (ORadj = 4.60; 95% CI = 1.59-13.32) or 46-60 years (ORadj = 2.69; 95% CI = 1.16-6.26) were better prepared than those aged 60-90 years; and, compared with those with no formal education, those educated to primary school level (ORadj = 2.43; 95% CI = 1.09-5.43) or to university level (ORadj = 3.18; 95% CI = 1.06-9.51) were better prepared.
Conclusion: Effective communication of essential, accurate and up-to-date information regarding COVID-19 prevention and control is essential in this population - especially for men, older age groups and those lacking formal education.
期刊介绍：
The journal will cover technical and clinical studies related to health, ethical and social issues in field of Public Health, Epidemiology, primary health care, epidemiology, health administration, health systems, health economics, health promotion, public health nutrition, communicable and non-communicable diseases, maternal and child health, occupational and environmental health, social and preventive medicine. Articles with clinical interest and implications will be given preference.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
