Efficacy and Safety of Lopinavir/Ritonavir or Arbidol in Adult Patients with Mild/Moderate COVID-19: An Exploratory Randomized Controlled Trial.

Med (New York, N.y.) Pub Date : 2020-12-18 Epub Date: 2020-05-19 DOI:10.1016/j.medj.2020.04.001
Yueping Li, Zhiwei Xie, Weiyin Lin, Weiping Cai, Chunyan Wen, Yujuan Guan, Xiaoneng Mo, Jian Wang, Yaping Wang, Ping Peng, Xudan Chen, Wenxin Hong, Guangming Xiao, Jinxin Liu, Lieguang Zhang, Fengyu Hu, Feng Li, Fuchun Zhang, Xilong Deng, Linghua Li
{"title":"Efficacy and Safety of Lopinavir/Ritonavir or Arbidol in Adult Patients with Mild/Moderate COVID-19: An Exploratory Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Yueping Li,&nbsp;Zhiwei Xie,&nbsp;Weiyin Lin,&nbsp;Weiping Cai,&nbsp;Chunyan Wen,&nbsp;Yujuan Guan,&nbsp;Xiaoneng Mo,&nbsp;Jian Wang,&nbsp;Yaping Wang,&nbsp;Ping Peng,&nbsp;Xudan Chen,&nbsp;Wenxin Hong,&nbsp;Guangming Xiao,&nbsp;Jinxin Liu,&nbsp;Lieguang Zhang,&nbsp;Fengyu Hu,&nbsp;Feng Li,&nbsp;Fuchun Zhang,&nbsp;Xilong Deng,&nbsp;Linghua Li","doi":"10.1016/j.medj.2020.04.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Antiviral therapies against the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2, which has caused a global pandemic of respiratory illness called COVID-19, are still lacking.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our study (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04252885, named ELACOI), was an exploratory randomized (2:2:1) controlled trial assessing the efficacy and safety of lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) or arbidol monotherapy for treating patients with mild/moderate COVID-19.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>This study successfully enrolled 86 patients with mild/moderate COVID-19, with 34 randomly assigned to receive LPV/r, 35 to arbidol, and 17 with no antiviral medication as control. Baseline characteristics of the three groups were comparable. The primary endpoint, the rate of positive-to-negative conversion of SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid, was similar between groups (all p > 0.05). There were no differences between groups in the secondary endpoints, the rates of antipyresis, cough alleviation, or improvement of chest computed tomography (CT) at days 7 or 14 (all p > 0.05). At day 7, 8 (23.5%) patients in the LPV/r group, 3 (8.6%) in the arbidol group, and 2 (11.8%) in the control group showed a deterioration in clinical status from moderate to severe/critical (p = 0.206). Overall, 12 (35.3%) patients in the LPV/r group and 5 (14.3%) in the arbidol group experienced adverse events during the follow-up period. No apparent adverse event occurred in the control group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>LPV/r or arbidol monotherapy present little benefit for improving the clinical outcome of patients hospitalized with mild/moderate COVID-19 over supportive care.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>This study was supported by project 2018ZX10302103-002, 2017ZX10202102-003-004, and Infectious Disease Specialty of Guangzhou High-level Clinical Key Specialty (2019-2021).</p>","PeriodicalId":272244,"journal":{"name":"Med (New York, N.y.)","volume":" ","pages":"105-113.e4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.medj.2020.04.001","citationCount":"225","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Med (New York, N.y.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medj.2020.04.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/5/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 225

Abstract

Background: Antiviral therapies against the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2, which has caused a global pandemic of respiratory illness called COVID-19, are still lacking.

Methods: Our study (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04252885, named ELACOI), was an exploratory randomized (2:2:1) controlled trial assessing the efficacy and safety of lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) or arbidol monotherapy for treating patients with mild/moderate COVID-19.

Findings: This study successfully enrolled 86 patients with mild/moderate COVID-19, with 34 randomly assigned to receive LPV/r, 35 to arbidol, and 17 with no antiviral medication as control. Baseline characteristics of the three groups were comparable. The primary endpoint, the rate of positive-to-negative conversion of SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid, was similar between groups (all p > 0.05). There were no differences between groups in the secondary endpoints, the rates of antipyresis, cough alleviation, or improvement of chest computed tomography (CT) at days 7 or 14 (all p > 0.05). At day 7, 8 (23.5%) patients in the LPV/r group, 3 (8.6%) in the arbidol group, and 2 (11.8%) in the control group showed a deterioration in clinical status from moderate to severe/critical (p = 0.206). Overall, 12 (35.3%) patients in the LPV/r group and 5 (14.3%) in the arbidol group experienced adverse events during the follow-up period. No apparent adverse event occurred in the control group.

Conclusions: LPV/r or arbidol monotherapy present little benefit for improving the clinical outcome of patients hospitalized with mild/moderate COVID-19 over supportive care.

Funding: This study was supported by project 2018ZX10302103-002, 2017ZX10202102-003-004, and Infectious Disease Specialty of Guangzhou High-level Clinical Key Specialty (2019-2021).

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

洛匹那韦/利托那韦或阿比多治疗成人轻/中度COVID-19患者的疗效和安全性:一项探索性随机对照试验
背景:针对新型冠状病毒SARS-CoV-2的抗病毒治疗仍然缺乏,SARS-CoV-2导致了全球呼吸系统疾病COVID-19的大流行。方法:本研究(ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04252885,命名为ELACOI)是一项探索性随机(2:2:1)对照试验,评估洛匹那韦/利托那韦(LPV/r)或阿比多尔单药治疗轻/中度COVID-19患者的疗效和安全性。结果:本研究成功招募了86例轻中度COVID-19患者,其中34例随机分配接受LPV/r治疗,35例接受阿比多尔治疗,17例不接受抗病毒药物治疗作为对照。三组的基线特征具有可比性。主要终点SARS-CoV-2核酸阳性转阴率组间比较差异无统计学意义(均p > 0.05)。在次要终点、第7天或第14天的退热率、咳嗽缓解率或胸部计算机断层扫描(CT)改善方面,两组间无差异(均p > 0.05)。第7天,LPV/r组8例(23.5%)、阿比多尔组3例(8.6%)、对照组2例(11.8%)患者的临床状况由中度恶化为重度/危重症(p = 0.206)。总体而言,LPV/r组12例(35.3%)患者和阿比多尔组5例(14.3%)患者在随访期间出现不良事件。对照组无明显不良事件发生。结论:与支持治疗相比,LPV/r或阿比多尔单药治疗对改善轻中度COVID-19住院患者的临床预后效果不大。项目资助:本研究由2018ZX10302103-002、2017ZX10202102-003-004项目和广州市高水平临床重点专科传染病专科(2019-2021)资助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信