[Perspectives of stakeholders on technology use in the care of community-living older adults with dementia].

Q4 Nursing
Tijdschrift voor Gerontologie en Geriatrie Pub Date : 2020-07-25 eCollection Date: 2020-09-01 DOI:10.36613/tgg.1875-6832/2020.03.03
Leonieke van Boekel, Eveline J M Wouters, Bea M Grimberg, Jogé Boumans, Nardo J M van der Meer, Katrien G Luijkx
{"title":"[Perspectives of stakeholders on technology use in the care of community-living older adults with dementia].","authors":"Leonieke van Boekel,&nbsp;Eveline J M Wouters,&nbsp;Bea M Grimberg,&nbsp;Jogé Boumans,&nbsp;Nardo J M van der Meer,&nbsp;Katrien G Luijkx","doi":"10.36613/tgg.1875-6832/2020.03.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although technology has the potential to promote aging in place among community-living older adults with dementia, the use remains scarce. In this literature study we provide an overview of perspectives (i.e., needs, wishes, attitudes, possibilities, and difficulties) of different stakeholders on technology use in the care for community-living older adults with dementia. After selection, 46 studies were included. We mainly found perspectives of informal caregivers and, to a lesser extent, of persons with dementia and formal caregivers. Shared perspectives were, among other things, ease of use, stability and flexibility of technology, importance of privacy, and confidentiality. Among older adults, fun and pleasure, in addition to enhancing freedom and independence, facilitates technology use. Informal caregivers' peace of mind and relief of burden also appeared to be important in using technologies. Formal caregivers value the potential of technologies to improve monitoring and communication. Insight in perspectives of stakeholders are essential to enhance the use of technology in the care for community-living older adults with dementia.</p>","PeriodicalId":39945,"journal":{"name":"Tijdschrift voor Gerontologie en Geriatrie","volume":"51 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tijdschrift voor Gerontologie en Geriatrie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36613/tgg.1875-6832/2020.03.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Although technology has the potential to promote aging in place among community-living older adults with dementia, the use remains scarce. In this literature study we provide an overview of perspectives (i.e., needs, wishes, attitudes, possibilities, and difficulties) of different stakeholders on technology use in the care for community-living older adults with dementia. After selection, 46 studies were included. We mainly found perspectives of informal caregivers and, to a lesser extent, of persons with dementia and formal caregivers. Shared perspectives were, among other things, ease of use, stability and flexibility of technology, importance of privacy, and confidentiality. Among older adults, fun and pleasure, in addition to enhancing freedom and independence, facilitates technology use. Informal caregivers' peace of mind and relief of burden also appeared to be important in using technologies. Formal caregivers value the potential of technologies to improve monitoring and communication. Insight in perspectives of stakeholders are essential to enhance the use of technology in the care for community-living older adults with dementia.

[利益相关者对技术在社区老年痴呆症护理中的应用的看法]。
虽然技术有可能促进社区生活的老年痴呆症患者的衰老,但这种使用仍然很少。在本文献研究中,我们概述了不同利益相关者在社区生活的老年痴呆症患者护理中使用技术的观点(即,需求,愿望,态度,可能性和困难)。经筛选,纳入46项研究。我们主要发现了非正式照顾者的观点,在较小程度上,痴呆症患者和正式照顾者的观点。除其他外,共同的观点是易用性、技术的稳定性和灵活性、隐私和机密性的重要性。在老年人中,乐趣和愉悦除了增强自由和独立之外,还促进了技术的使用。非正式照顾者的安心和减轻负担似乎在使用技术方面也很重要。正规护理人员重视技术在改善监测和沟通方面的潜力。在社区生活的老年痴呆症患者护理中,必须加强技术的使用,从利益攸关方的角度进行洞察。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信