[Death due to physical restraint in healthcare institutions].

Q4 Nursing
Tijdschrift voor Gerontologie en Geriatrie Pub Date : 2020-02-12 eCollection Date: 2020-03-16 DOI:10.36613/tgg.1875-6832/2020.01.02
Dingeman Rijken, Koen Milisen, Astrid Christiaens, Diona D'Hondt, Werner Jacobs, Wim Van De Voorde
{"title":"[Death due to physical restraint in healthcare institutions].","authors":"Dingeman Rijken,&nbsp;Koen Milisen,&nbsp;Astrid Christiaens,&nbsp;Diona D'Hondt,&nbsp;Werner Jacobs,&nbsp;Wim Van De Voorde","doi":"10.36613/tgg.1875-6832/2020.01.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Physical restraint is frequently used in healthcare institutions, usually in situations where the safety of the person (e.g. fall risk) or that of others (e.g. aggressive behaviour) is compromised, or where essential medical treatment is at stake. The implementation has a major impact with possible psychological consequences, physical injury and even fatal outcomes. In this retrospective study, fifteen deaths due to physical restraint are described. These have been investigated by the Forensic Medicine departments of UZ Leuven (1998 - 2018) and UZ Antwerpen (1999 - 2018). Death was caused by mechanical suffocation in all instances, mainly as a result of inadequate use of bedrails or belt restraint. These avoidable deaths are an urgent plea for a cautious and careful policy on physical restraint. Institutional guidelines and (further) training of health care personnel are of utmost importance. Central aspects are multidisciplinarity (deliberate decision-making), treatment (provoking factors), reticence (search for alternatives), proportionality (least intrusive method), due care (technical implementation), safety (increased supervision), temporality (re-evaluation of moment and duration), registration (accountability and liability) and communication (with all involved).</p>","PeriodicalId":39945,"journal":{"name":"Tijdschrift voor Gerontologie en Geriatrie","volume":"51 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tijdschrift voor Gerontologie en Geriatrie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36613/tgg.1875-6832/2020.01.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/3/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Physical restraint is frequently used in healthcare institutions, usually in situations where the safety of the person (e.g. fall risk) or that of others (e.g. aggressive behaviour) is compromised, or where essential medical treatment is at stake. The implementation has a major impact with possible psychological consequences, physical injury and even fatal outcomes. In this retrospective study, fifteen deaths due to physical restraint are described. These have been investigated by the Forensic Medicine departments of UZ Leuven (1998 - 2018) and UZ Antwerpen (1999 - 2018). Death was caused by mechanical suffocation in all instances, mainly as a result of inadequate use of bedrails or belt restraint. These avoidable deaths are an urgent plea for a cautious and careful policy on physical restraint. Institutional guidelines and (further) training of health care personnel are of utmost importance. Central aspects are multidisciplinarity (deliberate decision-making), treatment (provoking factors), reticence (search for alternatives), proportionality (least intrusive method), due care (technical implementation), safety (increased supervision), temporality (re-evaluation of moment and duration), registration (accountability and liability) and communication (with all involved).

[在医疗机构因身体限制而死亡]。
医疗机构经常使用身体约束,通常是在人身安全(例如跌倒风险)或他人安全(例如攻击行为)受到威胁的情况下,或在基本医疗受到威胁的情况下。实施会产生重大影响,可能造成心理后果、身体伤害甚至致命后果。在本回顾性研究中,描述了15例因身体约束而死亡的病例。鲁汶大学(1998年至2018年)和安特卫普大学(1999年至2018年)的法医部门对此进行了调查。在所有情况下,死亡都是由于机械窒息造成的,主要是由于没有充分使用床栏或安全带。这些本可避免的死亡迫切要求对身体约束采取谨慎和谨慎的政策。机构准则和(进一步)培训保健人员至关重要。核心方面是多学科(深思熟虑的决策)、治疗(引发因素)、沉默(寻找替代方案)、相称性(侵入性最小的方法)、应有的谨慎(技术实施)、安全性(加强监督)、临时性(重新评估时刻和持续时间)、登记(问责制和责任)和沟通(与所有相关方)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信