Research: Evaluation of Orthopedic Hip Device Recalls by the FDA from 2007 to 2017.

Q4 Medicine
Wesley Peters, Carl Pellerin, Cory Janney
{"title":"Research: Evaluation of Orthopedic Hip Device Recalls by the FDA from 2007 to 2017.","authors":"Wesley Peters,&nbsp;Carl Pellerin,&nbsp;Cory Janney","doi":"10.2345/0899-8205-54.6.418","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Medical device recalls have increased in the previous two decades. Orthopedic devices are estimated to constitute 12% of all medical devices recalled. Medical devices enter the market via the Food and Drug Administration's (FDA's) premarket approval (PMA) or 510(k) pathways. This article evaluates orthopedic hip device recalls between Jan. 1, 2007, and Dec. 31, 2017. We hypothesized that the 510(k) approval process would have substantially higher recall rates for defective devices.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The FDA's device recall database was queried for all orthopedic hip devices from Jan. 1, 2007, to Dec. 31, 2017. Each recall included product description, recall number, device class, date of recall posting, date of recall termination, manufacturer, FDA-determined cause for recall, number of recalled units, distribution, product classification, and method of approval [510(k), PMA, or unspecified].</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 774 orthopedic hip devices were recalled between Jan. 1, 2007, and Dec. 31, 2017. The 510(k) approval process constituted 85% of hip device recalls. The most common FDA-determined cause of hip device recalls was device design, which constituted 37% of 510(k)-approved device recalls but only 6% of PMA-approved device recalls. The most recalled hip devices were hip prostheses. Orthopedic hip device recalls have shown a decrease of about 10 recalls per year during the 11-year period of analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Devices approved through the 510(k) process, compared with the PMA process, were more likely to be recalled for design defects. Although device design is the most common reason for device recall, many recalls are due to suboptimally standardized processes (e.g., packaging, process controls, device labeling). Overall, orthopedic hip device recalls decreased during the period of analysis (2007-17).</p>","PeriodicalId":35656,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical Instrumentation and Technology","volume":"54 6","pages":"418-426"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical Instrumentation and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2345/0899-8205-54.6.418","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Medical device recalls have increased in the previous two decades. Orthopedic devices are estimated to constitute 12% of all medical devices recalled. Medical devices enter the market via the Food and Drug Administration's (FDA's) premarket approval (PMA) or 510(k) pathways. This article evaluates orthopedic hip device recalls between Jan. 1, 2007, and Dec. 31, 2017. We hypothesized that the 510(k) approval process would have substantially higher recall rates for defective devices.

Methods: The FDA's device recall database was queried for all orthopedic hip devices from Jan. 1, 2007, to Dec. 31, 2017. Each recall included product description, recall number, device class, date of recall posting, date of recall termination, manufacturer, FDA-determined cause for recall, number of recalled units, distribution, product classification, and method of approval [510(k), PMA, or unspecified].

Results: In total, 774 orthopedic hip devices were recalled between Jan. 1, 2007, and Dec. 31, 2017. The 510(k) approval process constituted 85% of hip device recalls. The most common FDA-determined cause of hip device recalls was device design, which constituted 37% of 510(k)-approved device recalls but only 6% of PMA-approved device recalls. The most recalled hip devices were hip prostheses. Orthopedic hip device recalls have shown a decrease of about 10 recalls per year during the 11-year period of analysis.

Conclusion: Devices approved through the 510(k) process, compared with the PMA process, were more likely to be recalled for design defects. Although device design is the most common reason for device recall, many recalls are due to suboptimally standardized processes (e.g., packaging, process controls, device labeling). Overall, orthopedic hip device recalls decreased during the period of analysis (2007-17).

研究:2007年至2017年FDA对骨科髋关节器械召回的评估。
背景:医疗器械召回在过去二十年中有所增加。骨科器械估计占所有被召回医疗器械的12%。医疗器械通过食品和药物管理局(FDA)的上市前批准(PMA)或510(k)途径进入市场。本文对2007年1月1日至2017年12月31日期间的骨科髋关节器械召回进行了评估。我们假设510(k)批准程序对缺陷器械的召回率会高得多。方法:查询2007年1月1日至2017年12月31日期间所有骨科髋关节器械的FDA器械召回数据库。每次召回包括产品描述、召回编号、器械类别、召回发布日期、召回终止日期、制造商、fda确定的召回原因、召回单位数量、分销、产品分类和批准方法[510(k)、PMA或未指明]。结果:在2007年1月1日至2017年12月31日期间,共有774个骨科髋关节装置被召回。510(k)审批程序占髋关节器械召回的85%。fda确定的髋关节器械召回最常见的原因是器械设计,占510(k)批准器械召回的37%,但仅占pma批准器械召回的6%。被召回最多的髋关节装置是髋关节假体。在11年的分析期间,骨科髋关节器械召回率每年减少约10次。结论:与PMA流程相比,通过510(k)流程批准的器械更有可能因设计缺陷而被召回。虽然器械设计是器械召回最常见的原因,但许多召回是由于标准化过程不理想(例如包装、过程控制、器械标签)。总体而言,在分析期间(2007-17),骨科髋关节装置召回减少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biomedical Instrumentation and Technology
Biomedical Instrumentation and Technology Computer Science-Computer Networks and Communications
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊介绍: AAMI publishes Biomedical Instrumentation & Technology (BI&T) a bi-monthly peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the developers, managers, and users of medical instrumentation and technology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信