The Value of an Incomplete Degree: Heterogeneity in the Labor Market Benefits of College Non-Completion.

IF 2.6 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Matt S Giani, Paul Attewell, David Walling
{"title":"The Value of an Incomplete Degree: Heterogeneity in the Labor Market Benefits of College Non-Completion.","authors":"Matt S Giani,&nbsp;Paul Attewell,&nbsp;David Walling","doi":"10.1080/00221546.2019.1653122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Many undergraduates leave college without completing a degree or credential. Some researchers characterize this as a waste of the student's time because (they assert) college short of a degree does not yield any advantage in the labor market. Using data for an entire cohort of students graduating high school in Texas in one year, we compare the employment and earnings years later of those who do not go beyond high school with those who enter college but do not complete a credential. Using techniques that address selection bias, we find that students with \"some college\" are considerably more likely to be employed fifteen years after high school graduation and tend to earn significantly more than their counterparts who do not go to college. These benefits are found across student subgroups, with low-income students, women, and students of color generally experiencing the greatest improvements in labor outcomes from college attendance. While college dropouts do not fare as well as college graduates, incomplete college nevertheless functions for many as a stepping-stone into a better labor market position.</p>","PeriodicalId":54209,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Higher Education","volume":"91 4","pages":"514-539"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00221546.2019.1653122","citationCount":"23","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Higher Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2019.1653122","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23

Abstract

Many undergraduates leave college without completing a degree or credential. Some researchers characterize this as a waste of the student's time because (they assert) college short of a degree does not yield any advantage in the labor market. Using data for an entire cohort of students graduating high school in Texas in one year, we compare the employment and earnings years later of those who do not go beyond high school with those who enter college but do not complete a credential. Using techniques that address selection bias, we find that students with "some college" are considerably more likely to be employed fifteen years after high school graduation and tend to earn significantly more than their counterparts who do not go to college. These benefits are found across student subgroups, with low-income students, women, and students of color generally experiencing the greatest improvements in labor outcomes from college attendance. While college dropouts do not fare as well as college graduates, incomplete college nevertheless functions for many as a stepping-stone into a better labor market position.

不完全学位的价值:未完成大学学业的劳动力市场收益异质性。
许多本科生没有完成学位或证书就离开了大学。一些研究人员认为这是在浪费学生的时间,因为(他们断言)没有学位的大学不会在劳动力市场上产生任何优势。我们使用了德克萨斯州一年内高中毕业的一整群学生的数据,比较了那些高中未毕业的学生和那些进入大学但未完成证书的学生几年后的就业和收入情况。使用解决选择偏差的技术,我们发现,有“一些大学”的学生在高中毕业15年后更有可能被雇用,并且往往比没有上过大学的同龄人挣得多得多。这些好处在不同的学生群体中都有发现,低收入学生、女性和有色人种的学生普遍从大学入学率中获得了最大的劳动成果改善。虽然大学辍学生的境遇不如大学毕业生好,但对许多人来说,未完成的大学教育仍然是进入更好的劳动力市场的敲门砖。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Higher Education
Journal of Higher Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
6.50%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Founded in 1930, The Journal of Higher Education publishes original research reporting on the academic study of higher education as a broad enterprise. We publish the highest quality empirical, theoretically grounded work addressing the main functions of higher education and the dynamic role of the university in society. We seek to publish scholarship from a wide variety of theoretical perspectives and disciplinary orientations. Articles appearing in the Journal employ an array of methodological approaches, and we welcome work from scholars across a range of career stages. Comparative and international scholarship should make clear connections to the U.S. context. Manuscripts not appropriate for submission to the Journal include purely theoretical papers, methodological treatises, unsolicited essays and reviews, and non-academic, institutional, and program evaluations or reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信